-
Posts
27,700 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
120
wbbfan last won the day on October 8
wbbfan had the most liked content!
Recent Profile Visitors
98,450 profile views
wbbfan's Achievements
-
Piggy 1 reacted to a post in a topic: Bombers at Elks early chat
-
K-Shack reacted to a post in a topic: Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
-
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: 2025 CFL (Non-Bombers) Season
-
Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
wbbfan replied to Atomic's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
yep. 90-93 bills, good ole marve levy. People also are quick to forget how high pressure was on the mafia and mos in 19. If we don’t get insanely lucky with zach, none of em are here the last several years. They all got a huge pressure release, but now that’s wearing off and we are making the same mistakes as 19 and before. -
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
-
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
-
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
-
yep colon cancer.
-
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: 2025 CFL (Non-Bombers) Season
-
Noeller reacted to a post in a topic: Bombers at Elks early chat
-
hope not and don’t think he will
-
BigBlueFanatic reacted to a post in a topic: Bombers at Elks early chat
-
coach17 reacted to a post in a topic: 2025 CFL (Non-Bombers) Season
-
BigBlueFanatic reacted to a post in a topic: Bombers at Elks early chat
-
Booch reacted to a post in a topic: Bombers at Elks early chat
-
think demski as well. Looks like a good few of em. Going to be a big adjustment for this team. no meaningless games to end the season, no bye week, decent chance of no home play off game. Going to have to peak and keep it up. Pedal to the metal time.
-
Tracker reacted to a post in a topic: Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
-
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: Bombers at Elks early chat
-
Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
wbbfan replied to Atomic's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
yep, we had struggles early last year and plenty in the past. We do fit guys to our system well, eventually. lmao i’m in -
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
-
we had a fighting chance, against the favoured ti cats. Hammy had a great team that year. They just weren’t clutch and didn’t have that ability to fight through adversity. the 19 bombers had all the character, drive and work ethic in the world. That 19 cats team wins 9 times out of 10 if not playing 19/21 bombers.
-
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: 2025 CFL (Non-Bombers) Season
-
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: 2025 CFL (Non-Bombers) Season
-
rebusrankin reacted to a post in a topic: Former Bombers in NFL (and spring leagues) news
-
johnzo reacted to a post in a topic: Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
-
wbbfan reacted to a post in a topic: 2025 CFL (Non-Bombers) Season
-
Damn straight. Really good article on the rule change. https://3downnation.com/2025/10/08/duke-ellingson-incoming-cfl-rule-changes-questionable-at-best/
-
Former Bombers in NFL (and spring leagues) news
wbbfan replied to WinnipegGordo's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
As it is, hardly anyone cares about the CFL outside of the prairies. BC can't get people to stay and watch a lions game free after a big time concert. -
Halls' play-off adjustments to the DL were a massive game-changer, ba coming in at S was massive once the secondary settled as well. We had played soo soft before that people were losing their minds. 100%, the game was won in the trenches, and with physicality. Drake Nevis has become maybe the most slept on guy from that 19 win. Early, when he and Stove played together, it was a mauling. Then we switched to more and more cheetah with WJ, JJ, Hansen, and Kongbo and the cats couldn't keep up. Even the 30 cheetah we ran with wj on the nose, flanked by JJ and kongbo was vicious. It's a shame Craig Roh didn't get to dress for that game. He is another slept-on guy who is likely responsible for more of our DL success in that era than most would ever know. He was one of the best minds when it came to DL technique, pass rushing moves, and front play we've seen up here. His camps and books were extraordinary in their quality, he would've been one of the best DL coaches in the era. F%%^ cancer.
-
Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
wbbfan replied to Atomic's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Oh easy. If you took off jake, and kornys snaps and put in the worst imp DTs we've had the last 2 years you would have significantly better front play, pressure, sacks, hits disruption etc. In the CFL, you don't need to have the highest sack total. But you NEED to cause disruption at least. You don't even need pressures and hits. If you can push the inside of the pocket back onto the lap of the QB within 3-4 seconds consistently, you force the qb to go from about to toss it to having to look down, avoid the disruption, find another spot, reset, look back down field, and try to find a target. OR, they have to try and throw over a mass of humanity (when cfl qbs are pretty short in general) and risk their arm on the follow through. Which still messes with mechanics a lot. In the past, teams that ran 30 fronts understood this. They focused their down linemen on guys who could win a bull rush 1-on-1, or could shoot a gap with a swim move and loop into the pocket. People here would always be stunned when the bend but don't break argos managed to sack our qbs repeatedly in a game. And while it is not the fastest way to rush/pressure/sack, it is one of the hardest to defend and prevent disruption from in the CFL. Because every team is rolling 2-3 NI interior OL (most always 3, you usually see 2 on bad teams), the Canadian OL are much less adept at dealing with nose tackles, pass rushing 3ts, and 4ts. Those guys, often imports, are generally in the 275-300 lbs range but insanely powerful and surprisingly athletic. With diverse rush ability, and the ability to run tite fronts, twist etc that makes the assignment harder to plan for. Sure, if you get the double on the 4t with the tackle, it should be pretty easy. But the other side of that you have a 1on1, or you have a 1on1 with the nose. And the C, is most often filled by guys undersized and who aren't higher end picks. How many Cs in the cfl today could lock up a prime stove 1on1 for most of the game? None imo. For the level of pressure/disruption we get from our OL, we would be as well off taking thomas out and playing 1 less dl in general. -
They were favorites; the bombers had a whole lot going for them, but Zach wasn't exactly lighting the world on fire yet. The cat's D was better most of the year, their teams were better, and their offence was better virtually the entire year. We all knew when zach made the crazy legs play to adams we had a shot, but at no point in time where the bombers the favorite to win vs hamilton.
-
If you need an extra day after a bye week to stay healthy, you aren't going to stay healthy anyway. his main issue isn't fighting off injuries; it's how much he's degraded in terms of level of play when injuries have and may have been involved that he played through. Rest day isn't going to change that. And this, as I mentioned as well. Practice these days is soft AF. He could've shown up in slippers and a housecoat without an issue. It's not any big issue of it self, but it is a big old red flag indicating the over all problem. At this point, they should be kicking it into high gear. Instead, we are trialing guys for next year's camp, handing out vet days, and doing the minimum. Edmonton is going to play hungry. They need to win to stay alive in the playoffs. They just surprised the riders and are a better team than their record indicates. If we don't match or exceed their energy/physicality/execution early in this game, it's going to be tough to win.
-
the week after a bye, in the end of the season with us in the cross over spot. No one should be getting vet card days. It’s not like practice is insanely physically demanding in this era either.
-
Not every one that’s for sure. It’s important to have enough competitive balance that any team can turn it around and not be perpetually bad as hopeless, like several nba franchises. But what’s best is variety mixed with great stories. You want to have turn arounds and upstarts like the blue jays, but you also want to have them come up against the likes of the evil empire nyy. That, is compelling and entertaining to every one, even when it’s one sided. In 19 the cats were run away favorites, but we shocked them and the cfl to end a huge drought ushering forth an extraordinary stretch of success. Even the staunchest bomber haters say that was great viewing. You don’t get that with total parity. You need balance, but being too middle of the road is not good.
-
Blue Bombers - 2025 Regular Season - Discussion Thread
wbbfan replied to Atomic's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I mean, we list Ayers as a DE... He listed as light as 221 in high school lol. Fun fact, he also returned a squib kick for a TD twice in high school. He listed 260, and that might be a bit generous given his short height. He reminds me of Habba. Stocky, one move rusher with solid athleticism, and a low below pads rush type. He does show much better hand usage than Habba, and he is an extremely versatile guy. He played DE, some 3-tech, 3-4 OLB (Jack), Mac, Wil, and Sam. He also played a bunch of teams.