Jump to content

rebusrankin

Members
  • Posts

    9,651
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

rebusrankin last won the day on March 4

rebusrankin had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

5,577 profile views

rebusrankin's Achievements

  1. Some combination of an OL, DL and either a LB or WR with our top 3 picks seems ideal imo.
  2. They need to pick talented players with the potential to start not roster fillers like Bennet or Smeckle or guys who are just going to be STers.
  3. I didn't put Mimbs on the list because he played only 2 years with us, granted he did lead the CFL in rushing for both. Wondered about Washington but wasn't sure, glad people mentioned him. Blink was great but to me its Lewis due to a higher yard per carry and 4 Cup wins..
  4. I appreciate all the work that went into this. I like the idea of an OL in round 1 and then 2 defensive players in round 2. One question, where is the fullback?
  5. I didn't give you permission to post a picture of me. My lawyer, Jackie Chiles will be in touch.
  6. I didn't see the rationale in Hodge having us take 1 let alone 2 full backs. I also thought based on his mock, why take a fb when you could take Theo Benedet instead since we essentially have a bonus 2nd rounder.
  7. I feel like those are the 5. Lewis, Roberts, Harris, Reaves as the top 4 in some order. For the 5th, I feel you can debate Hanson and James. Am likely missing somebody.
  8. For the record, I am not horny for a fullback. Cheerleaders on the other hand.....
  9. The idea of us taking a lineman in round 1 and a DL in round 2 works for me but I don't get us taking the rb/fb Hodge suggests. If the draft went they way he did I think we'd go OL going to the US as a futures pick in round 2. The ST in round 3 pick and the rational is laughable.
×
×
  • Create New...