Jump to content

Free Agency Frenzy


BigBlue

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Mike said:

Honestly, I think a major part of it is because he's huge, he's got big bushy hair and he's got a cool name.

I'd hope it's not because of his football ability. He's about as raw as they come.

I honestly trace it all back to the one pre-season game where he tipped a ball at the line (did he intercept it or was it just a knock down??) and people freaked out. That, along with the cool name, made people go: "ZOMG! DOUG BROWN 2.0!!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't see any holes that we need to fill via free agency.  

If we can get 1 or 2 starters from the draft then we are in a great position moving forward.    

If we can get a bargain on a 6th oline guy and maybe a Canadian receiver then that would be gravy for us...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Taynted_Fayth said:

I like Marshall, would have likely still been our RB had we not picked up Harris. definitely better then anything they got at RB at the moment

I will disagree...  I thought Flanders was much smoother and had much more speed. 

Stats wise:

Marshall -  4.4 average,   longest run was 26 yards

Flanders - 6.1 average, longest run was 50 yards

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brandon said:

I will disagree...  I thought Flanders was much smoother and had much more speed. 

Stats wise:

Marshall -  4.4 average,   longest run was 26 yards

Flanders - 6.1 average, longest run was 50 yards

 

was Flanders even with us in 2015?  If we don't have Harris in our sights going into 2016 I doubt we let Marshall walk (although he did get NFL interest upon doing so) but let's say we resigned him last offseason, I still don't think Flanders unseats him any more then he did Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Brandon said:

I will disagree...  I thought Flanders was much smoother and had much more speed. 

Stats wise:

Marshall -  4.4 average,   longest run was 26 yards

Flanders - 6.1 average, longest run was 50 yards

 

the ol flanders had was worlds better. Marshall is faster more gifted but was never steady. Flanders is much more reliable and an every down back. Cam marshall is more upside. Not that the riders have the OL or actually run the ball to get that out of him. Its a good talent pick up though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://thehuddle.com/x10/nfl_draft/scout_rpt/qb-dan-lefevour.php

http://www.sbnation.com/2010/3/13/1371131/dan-lefevour-nfl-draft-scouting

Really like this move. If we got him for no2 money its a great spot. We have a legit battle at No2 and 2 guys who could come off the bench and give a change of pace with their mobility. Showed some nice flashes against us and ham. Kind of an older jonathon jennings. I wouldnt mind seeing us bring in a young qb to groom a bit. MBT isnt under contract and would be the odd man out imop. But all in all really good moves this year. Denmark and a DT then young guys and a good draft. Gonna be hard for this off season not to be an A. 

4 minutes ago, Brandon said:

I have no prob with LeFevour as a 3rd string/backup.   The guy is mobile and has experience. 

Flanders also returns kicks...  I don't remember Marshall doing this.   

1 return when he was back as a blocker. Marshall returned kicks for us in one game. Neither guy is a returner, basically any RB can be put there but doesnt mean they will be good at it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

the ol flanders had was worlds better. Marshall is faster more gifted but was never steady. Flanders is much more reliable and an every down back. Cam marshall is more upside. Not that the riders have the OL or actually run the ball to get that out of him. Its a good talent pick up though.

I think Marshall was chronically underused but showed well when given the ball later in the season, he's a real power back that's hard to bring down.  Good pick up by the Greenies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

I think Marshall was chronically underused but showed well when given the ball later in the season, he's a real power back that's hard to bring down.  Good pick up by the Greenies.

He was stuck in a glutt of rbs. Showed some real flashes but wasnt able to secure the job. Course you can say it was the system / ol and probably be right atleast in part. Hes got a great mix of skills running the ball for the cfl game. I want to say he struggled catching the ball out of the backfield but mostly i remember his smooth  fluid running style. Certainly a good pick up, and a guy Im glad isnt out of football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...