Forums
-
Discussion Forums
-
- 5.7k
- posts
-
- 1.4k
- posts
-
- 593
- posts
-
- The TV Thread
- By iHeart,
-
-
Member Statistics
2,680
Total Members3,836
Most Online
-
Forum Statistics
13.5k
Total Topics732.4k
Total Posts -
Recently Browsing 3 members
-
Recent Posts
-
yup....see 2019-2021 -
prior grey cupshave shown us teams can win with average at best QB's if you have a sound roster...smart game plan....ability to adjust, and see the issues....in a nutshell....smart coaching
-
explain last yr then when he was deployed more than Lawson...and dont say Lawson wasnt ready....he was a beast already but as others have said....as extreme depth...5-10 reps a game....be stomacheable.....that being said if it was also ratio dependent....also he was a part of a good defence....but what's his cumulative contribution to it...and where has he stood out.....in a impactful way?....But anyone who can honesty say him taking reps before Woods..Adams...Fox make our defense better truly not watching. ...and is strictly a Osh loyalist as what many of us were saying all yr Osh has a Canadian bias and if not for the ratio would dress as many as he could...even if they are a lesser talent....he does it now....
-
That is true... Good point. And for the record, I was quite vocal about a perceived misuse of the DL. They were absolutely married to a Nat DT for some reason, so that was never going to change whether it was Jake or Cam. 100%... And even those of us who are taking a "let's all chill..." Approach right now, were very vocal about this weird use of Nats during the season.... -
With the exception of a couple of games where Randolph was starting at guard, they were starting 6 Canadians on Offense (3 OL, 2 Rec, 1 RB) Ford in the secondary, Kramdi at LB That's 8 Canadians without even using the nationalized American rule Thomas and Schmeckel could easily have been used as rotational pieces only, with an American being Lawson's primary replacement I'd never claim to be an expert, but that approach would sure make sense to me
-