Leaderboard

Just thought I'd quote this while I'm in here. Start to finish maybe the best three and a half minutes in Simpsons history

To me with the way free agency is (no restricted free agency) every draft pick is 2-3 years with their original team at best whether they are hitting CFL free agency or heading south. The draft is getting less and less important as free agency becomes crazier.

Was tired of lusting after big receivers, anyways....

I think we'll have to face the fact that Speedflex is who he is. He's not going to get "fixed"

Saw this on twitter feed. https://www.bluebombers.com/2018/03/16/words-thomas-miles-trip-snow-lake/ Very interesting article by Thomas Miles about his and Goosen's trip to Snow Lake: He's a good writer.

possible CFL players (if you need a football fix) live stream

And it shouldn't be too hard to have 2 Canadians on the field on D with the depth of decent players we have, plus anyone added in the draft. That's all it is. They don't have to designate certain positions as Canadian. For ultimate flexibility, 5 on O and 2 on D looks best to me with an extra Canadian used on O quite often.

That goal Roslo scored last game was a beauty. That was just pure talent. I don't know who sits but Roslo should be playing.

Thomas was far under the level of poop + nevis, and ekakatie is behind thomas. Corney is closer but still well back of our 3 headed imp monster that is defensive end as well. miles n briggs are an interesting thought at wil with jsk at mac. This, now more then ever we seem poised to start a ni db (other then saftey) Though I suspect we will see it be on offense to start. Coates, lafrance and wolitarski. Thats a bloody strong rotation. I dont think itll be on the OL short of gray coming sooner then expected. I think we will plug foketi in on the OL. We have an opening for the 7th canadian, but the difference between us and teams in trouble with the ratio is we have a few good options to fill out that 7th spot. And a few good bodies at those positions.

Trump is being backed into a corner, slowly the screws are being tightened and he will do something rash that could cost him more than the presidency.

also

Maybe between Miles/Briggs/Corney/Ekakatie we can start a second Canajan on defence

http://nationalpost.com/opinion/rex-murphy-trudeau-is-captain-canada-to-our-threatened-steel-workers-our-oil-workers-silence

Well you’ve always jumped to conclusions actually. That trump is great and there is nothing to mueller’s investigation. If you want to hold McCabe to a standard that sees him fired hours before retirement in a petty effort to deny his well earned pension then you’d certainly want Trump removes. And certainly sessions as well. Anyway, back to reality.

I like the ratio flexibility that Muamba would provide and I hope we can find a way to sign him. I would prefer to not have to declare more than 5 NI's on offence until it is necessitated by injury. That said, he wasn't scheduled to be a free agent this year. This team had a plan for the roster and who they wanted to sign. Presumably they have already done that. If we are unable to sign Muamba, it does not affect the plan. Muamba was never part of the plan. He is an unexpected opportunity; one I hope we can take advantage of.

I did forget about Mrabure ... I'd be failing myself if I didn't point out that you may be slightly "grass is greener on the other side"-ing the depth in Calgary if you're going to talk up guys like Grozman and Colling and then turn around and say you have question marks about guys like Ekakitie and Wolitarsky - but still, I think both teams have questions to answer. I think Muamba is worth the price tag. I also think there's more at play than just deciding if we can trim salary and add Muamba. Quite honestly, if it was up to me and I was making moves without considering the collateral damage you can do to your franchise, I would've cut Wild yesterday to bring in Muamba but there are things that I don't think we can discount that impact a decision like that - is this franchise in the business of cutting guys they JUST signed (aka ****ing them over big time) to new deals? I don't think they are. That limits the moves they can make. Do they want to bring in a guy who doesn't come across as much of a "team first" type? Or if you want to go one step further, a "winner"? I'm not sure they want to make all these decisions for a guy like that. Would I? Probably. But I don't think I'm in a position to say that we can just ignore those other factors. Whether I agree with it or not, I do think this team places a lot of value on the idea of a "all for one" mentality in the locker room and it's not just about assembling the most talent possible - when you look at Calgary, you can kind of understand why. They want pieces that fit the room. Maybe they're not sure they want to pay the premium for a guy who may not accomplish that.

And FWIW, I don't think we are the only "top flight" West team with Canadian question marks. I don't even think ours are the biggest question marks. Calgary, way more issues than us IMO ... they've got Singleton, Bergman, Erdos, Wilson, they've got to find 2 receivers to play for them between Brescacin/Parker/Durant and then they still need another starter somewhere whether it's Wiggan/Colling at DT or Adeleke at SAM. Don't know about the health status of Lavertu or Turner, but I suppose they could be factors (Turner more so than Lavertu, who I think may be finished) Saskatchewan is in just as rough shape if not worse, Edmonton has a few question marks but they're looking alright. I guess all I'm saying is it's normal to have questions that need answering in March.

also ,Wolitarski.

That's to bad loved the show loved the character loved all the characters on that show my favorite of all time by far.