Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 2025-12-11 in Posts

  1. The older QB's like Bo and Harris seem to be aging like fine wine. Our old QB is aging like homogenized milk poured into a Betamax machine thats been left in the New Delhi heat during Diwali.
    4 points
  2. 2 yrs.....didnt expect that...
    3 points
  3. BLM was horrendous in the 2nd half of last season. If anyone else in that division has a healthy QB the majority of the season Hamilton is probably 3rd or 4th place.
    2 points
  4. This sentence was a tough read.
    2 points
  5. wilson and lawson back is big. Hopefully on reasonable deals.
    2 points
  6. How most world wide web posts end with.
    1 point
  7. 🕖 1900 📺 TSN3 Stats: 18-13-0 @ 14-14-1 Streaks: W3 @ L2 Last Ten: 6-4-0 @ 2-7-1 🤮 Bruins projected lineup TBA Jets projected lineup TBA Status report TBA
    1 point
  8. That has become so prominent across North American sports these days. NFL teams, especially with QBs carry dead years on the back of contracts in order to stretch out the term and pay more, knowing they will end up eating it. We see the same in MLB and the NBA, where if a guy has 2-3 good years left, you have to pay 5-6 to get those from him. I wonder if it's going to wind up better for him or the cats. Is it bonus/guaranteed money he will walk with if he retires after next year? Or is it just a lock in that if he decides to play the 2nd year that he will get paid what he wants for it. In the CFL, I could see having a guy like that sit the final year on a 6-game and get his base without hitting the cap.
    1 point
  9. There is a kind of loose justification every team must give the league for the marketing money. According to most reports I've read about the justification to the league it is pretty close to "trust me bro".
    1 point
  10. Yeah our fine wine is now degraded into vinegar
    1 point
  11. If there is no limit on marketing money, we should give Brady 200,000 (if he's coming back on a 300,000 deal) and give Zach something similar. Exploit that rule because we have the money.
    1 point
  12. Yep, the only limit is that the team has to be able to justify the amount of marketing money being paid to a player. If BC was allowed to give Rourke 200k, the Bombers should have no problems giving Brady a good chunk either.
    1 point
  13. Darren Becker, former Bombers equipment guy. https://www.instagram.com/p/DSEOA0DjFMU/
    1 point
  14. Yeah take advantage of the fact we have been pulling in the cash...reward the fans for that support
    1 point
  15. If there is no limit on market money, the Bombers should use it extensively. Club has been making bank the past few years.
    1 point
  16. Love it! I love that Wilson and Lawson are the first two guys signed. I think it means we’re prioritizing the youth. There was so many times I saw Lawson double and tripled teamed and he still got to the quarterback. He’s a beast and will only look even better next once we get some help beside him.
    1 point
  17. Good for Lawson.... Now let's actually play the ******* guy.
    1 point
  18. Glad that we've signed younger guys in Lawson and Wilson.
    1 point
  19. I asked her. She looked confused and disgusted and walked away as usual.
    1 point
  20. Walter's has brought in guys....and who knows what the guys we cut in camp who showed really well would have done if we didnt do the usual and gift spots to dead weight coach's favs The key thing this yr is Osh needs to smarten up and roster...and THEN play his best talent...and use his ratio to best compliment the team and talent here...not his lame carved in stone this is where we play Canadians regardless if they not the best.......basically his whole time here Aslo...maybe shelf his vision of playing excessive Canadians just cause he has a Maple Leaf flag up his keister, when it doesnt benefit us...just soothes his ego...agenda...whatever the heck it is, but it's utterly pointless
    1 point
  21. That's been the complaint about Osh for years. He trots out extra Canadians at positions where we have better American players. It goes on every year & then he scratches his head wondering why it didn't work in big games that we needed to win. he has never maximized our roater properly. We really don't know how good we can be.
    1 point
  22. Is it just me or does it seem counterintuitive to pay up for the "ratio breakers" with the way O'Shea uses his roster? Don't get me wrong, I know the CFL is all about how good your Canadian talent is, but part of me thinks there's no point paying 250k+ for a star Canadian RB/DB/WR/whatever because we aren't maximizing our roster with the ratio to play the most American talent anyways. With the way MOS just plays 8-9+ marginal Canadian starters and rotates in 3-4 more, we'd almost be better off with 10-12 good but not great Canadians and save our money overpaying for the Canadian starter at a non-traditional position. I wish we would utilize the fact that we have the luxury of a Canadian RB by using the extra American on the DL or OL, but instead most games we just trot out 7+ more Canadians at the regular spots too...
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...