Wanna-B-Fanboy

It would be much more beneficial to the discusion if you guys would support your points of view with some facts from legitimate sources. I really do appreciate you and @Zontar differing opinions and views on these matters. My only ask is that you would source your facts better.

Yes... because that is the proper question to ask in this instance...

This is so shady... https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-secrecy-exclusive-idUSKBN20Y2LM "The officials said that dozens of classified discussions about such topics as the scope of infections, quarantines and travel restrictions have been held since mid-January in a high-security meeting room at the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), a key player in the fight against the coronavirus. Staffers without security clearances, including government experts, were excluded from the interagency meetings, which included video conference calls, the sources said. “We had some very critical people who did not have security clearances who could not go,” one official said. “These should not be classified meetings. It was unnecessary.”

There was an excellent blog here: https://cnu.edu/wasoncenter/2019/07/01-2020-election-forecast/ "In July of 2018, my innovative forecasting model raised eyebrows by predicting some four months before the midterm election that Democrats would pick up 42 seats in the House of Representatives. In hindsight, that may not seem such a bold prediction, but when my forecast was released, election Twitter was still having a robust debate as to whether the Blue Wave would be large enough for Democrats to pick up the 23 seats they needed to take control of the House of Representatives and return the Speaker’s gavel to Nancy Pelosi." Well worth the read

CNN > notrickszonenoreallynotricksatall.com

Its not the platform and ideas that are being rejected- it's the question of electability. polll after poll after poll shows that US citizens want the stuff Bernie is putting out there.

The above has nothing to do with what we were discussing- carry on.

The establishment pulled it off. Looks like 4 more years of trump. awesome.

I was just pointing out how out to lunch that misogynistic comment of yours was. Should have known I was going to get a reply dismissing that chauvinistic "vibe".

So wrong and such an ignorant comment. First of all... she is a dog person. Second of all- she is married. She was a professor, not a librarian. And if she is scolding you... you probably deserve it.

Nope. We've already established that you are nowhere near a devil's advocate.

Except... none of what You said above is true.

Supporting, yes- ass sucking? No, I don't think so.

And pigeye with the troll...

We were talking about how fox news picked up the Hillary sliding in as POTUS because of Biden: Then you started to lash out about Bloomberg, Woke virtue signallers and snowflake SJWs and all that alt-right jargon. Like I said- watching fox news is not a crime.

We were talking about Biden, not bloomberg... It's alright, there is no shame in watching fox news.

Just saying that the timing was very similar.

Oh yeah... saw that on fox news. Oddly the only place that I saw that... https://www.foxnews.com/media/hillary-clinton-bidens-vp-john-sununu For someone who rejects mainstream media you echo a lot of the talking points...

https://globalnews.ca/news/6649905/oil-price-plunge-impact-canada-alberta/amp/ I am wondering how Kenny is going to pin this on Notley. "Rachel was in Wuhan, developing covid 19 to take money feom the hard working tax payers of Alberta and advance her socialist agenda!"

There is always a tweet.... lol. Secondly... there can be two people with cognitive decline vying for PoTUs.

The American Conservative is really decent and factual- they constantly adhere to conservative tenets. They're reporting is pretty good- always well sourced with a pretty spotless fact checking record. The Federalist, is dogshit.

https://www.wired.com/story/travel-bans-and-quarantines-wont-stop-coronavirus/ https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadas-decision-against-travel-bans-tied-to-coronavirus-backed-by/ https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200213175923.htm https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-travel-restrictions-effectiveness.html https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/02/why-travel-restrictions-are-not-stopping-coronavirus-covid-19/ https://www.science20.com/news_staff/are_travel_bans_during_infectious_disease_outbreaks_effective-245280 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/03/05/science.aba9757.full https://www.sciencenews.org/article/travel-ban-coronavirus-spread

@The Unknown Poster is a "leftist"? Yeah, he's not. When trump came into power we started to agree on a lot more things... prior to that.. very little when not involving the bombers...