Jump to content

Wanna-B-Fanboy

Members
  • Posts

    9,499
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Wanna-B-Fanboy

  1. We were talking about how fox news picked up the Hillary sliding in as POTUS because of Biden: Then you started to lash out about Bloomberg, Woke virtue signallers and snowflake SJWs and all that alt-right jargon. Like I said- watching fox news is not a crime.
  2. We were talking about Biden, not bloomberg... It's alright, there is no shame in watching fox news.
  3. Just saying that the timing was very similar.
  4. Oh yeah... saw that on fox news. Oddly the only place that I saw that... https://www.foxnews.com/media/hillary-clinton-bidens-vp-john-sununu For someone who rejects mainstream media you echo a lot of the talking points...
  5. https://globalnews.ca/news/6649905/oil-price-plunge-impact-canada-alberta/amp/ I am wondering how Kenny is going to pin this on Notley. "Rachel was in Wuhan, developing covid 19 to take money feom the hard working tax payers of Alberta and advance her socialist agenda!"
  6. There is always a tweet.... lol. Secondly... there can be two people with cognitive decline vying for PoTUs.
  7. The American Conservative is really decent and factual- they constantly adhere to conservative tenets. They're reporting is pretty good- always well sourced with a pretty spotless fact checking record. The Federalist, is dogshit.
  8. https://www.wired.com/story/travel-bans-and-quarantines-wont-stop-coronavirus/ https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadas-decision-against-travel-bans-tied-to-coronavirus-backed-by/ https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200213175923.htm https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-travel-restrictions-effectiveness.html https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/02/why-travel-restrictions-are-not-stopping-coronavirus-covid-19/ https://www.science20.com/news_staff/are_travel_bans_during_infectious_disease_outbreaks_effective-245280 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/03/05/science.aba9757.full https://www.sciencenews.org/article/travel-ban-coronavirus-spread
  9. @The Unknown Poster is a "leftist"? Yeah, he's not. When trump came into power we started to agree on a lot more things... prior to that.. very little when not involving the bombers...
  10. That is some serious deflection and whataboutism... The constant deflection and whataboutism when it comes to anything trump, pretty much paints you as a trump defender. how else could you view it? if this was JT: There would be outrage from everyone...
  11. The thread... pretty accurate and not flattering... Looks Like Preet found his twitter legs.
  12. Thanks a lot Kaiser Wilhelm... *******...
  13. But you do... a lot of your arguments are fox news talking points. Many of your rebuttals... Fox news talking points... Much of the conspiracies that toss around... fox news. If you are not deliberately spreading fox news talking points and misinformation... then you are being seriously manipulated- you should check it out if that is the case.
  14. I think I just found out how to get out of work for two weeks... "I.. uh.. shook Ted cruz's hand... this weekend at Cpac...."
  15. What, and just take your word for it?
  16. HUnter is a crook? I haven't read anything like that- please post some links. I was not under the impressionism that he was a crook. Biden lied about it?
  17. So people can't be critical if he votes one way and then flip flops on a vote that is directly related to the initial vote? or else they are hypocrites? dafuq kind of reasoning is that?
  18. wow... numbers matter- people's lives don't... straight from the POtuS' mouth...
  19. Can you image if trump contracted Covid-19 and died- that would be one of the most ironic things I would have witnessed in my life... I am Not wishing for it... just thought that would be crazy ironic.
  20. What metrics are you using to come to this conclusion?
  21. What metrics are you using to come to this conclusion?
  22. I don't believe that is what he trying to say. I think he trying to point out the imagined hypocrisy that the Democratic party should cry sexism in Tulsi' s case because they did the same for Warren.... furthermore showcased by dropping Tulsi from the debate, supposedly changing the rules to make that happen- because she has a ******. not taking into account her failed Candidacy, unpopular platform and her lone delegate... And possible because she is not even campaigning anymore.... Cherrypicking points to create hypocrisy .
  23. I don't think you know what sexism is...
  24. Gotta say, that avatar - you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...