Wanna-B-Fanboy

Imploring "nothing but positive and confidence building posts the entire week.... " in a thread entitled ""riders Suck!" is a very bold ask.

I am still hoping for three GOP senators to go against the Impeachment vote in the senate and demand a secret ballot.... then the knives will come out... Also- about that pressure Zelensky was not feeling...

With answers written by his lawyers none the less... insane. Also, you don't think the GOP are going to go full hypocrite on this one as with everything else? Hard for them? Hardly. But I get what you are saying and I do agree with you. It should be hard for them.

Wwwwwoooooooooooo **** you Fajita!!!!! **** you Covaj!

Holding?

We used that play Dickie using Osh do that

Riders are taking him out. Hence why the long ball seems to be working

Nope- we are not getting those calls. Holding- nope... Off sides? Nope Throwing past the lone of scrimmage .. you guessed it. Nope

Money

WOLI!

The first was a **** you play The second was a ****** up play

We cant generate pressure if we are being held. If the refs let holding go- then we are ******... we have seen this all year.

Refs Trying too hard to give the game to the riders

TOUCHDOWN

No offside on that receiver... god damn

So... you are not watching the riders and their inbred fans?

They are trying to keep up with the missed penalties for the bombers

No holding call on the return... oh ****. This is going to be a long Game and I might need a new tv after this game

They better call the offside fairly

Purifoy with douchy hit on the ground

Sounds more like Jay Sekulow and Pat Cipollone.

Great song... but an... interesting pick for Game day... We need more of this: It's worth a gander. huge Lulz at 1:15

SHUT YOUR MOUTH ABOUT RAMBO!!!!

You are showing your ignorance when you equate what Cherry said and what Allen said, when you completely neglect the context. Virtue signaling? lazy argument and also not really applicable here, please brush up on your definitions if you are going to sling 'em around to stifle debate. It often feels like such a waste of time, because I am 99% sure you are not even going to click on the links provided- but there is still that 1% possibility that you will. I even quoted a few lines from each link, so even if you didn't want to click on the link, there are still some nuggets for you to read. https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/stop-saying-virtue-signalling "At best, virtue signalling is a pretentious way of saying 'showing off'. At worst, it is mental armour against self-doubt. People should stop saying it." https://www.ft.com/content/cf4d3d5c-7129-11e9-bf5c-6eeb837566c5 "the term is used increasingly to silence those who support causes the critic dislikes.... It is instead the insult of choice for people who don’t want to have to engage with the issue itself. In truth, what the critic dislikes is rarely the signalling; it is the virtue." https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/20/virtue-signalling-putdown-passed-sell-by-date "What started off as a clever way to win arguments has become a lazy put down. It’s too often used to cast aspersions on opponents as an alternative to rebutting their arguments. In fact, it’s becoming indistinguishable from the thing it was designed to call out: smug posturing from a position of self-appointed authority." What group was she bigoted about? Serious question.