Wanna-B-Fanboy

"I like dill pickles and prime rib" doesn't necessarily mean "I like dill pickles and prime rib at the same time".

Cool- the rigged districts need to be redrawn- fairly.

You are pouring over the rules and focusing on the "And"- You are not looking at the actual complete wording on the rule. "Article 4 - Unnecessary Roughness A player shall be penalized for any act of unnecessary roughness against an opponent, including but not limited to: Delivering a forcible blow to the long snapper while their head is down and they are in a vulnerable position and unable to protect them self," That now reads: A player shall be penalized for any act of unnecessary roughness against an opponent, including but not limited to: -Delivering a forcible blow to the long snapper while their head is down - Delivering a forcible blow to the long snapper while they are in a vulnerable position. -Delivering a forcible blow to the long snapper while they are unable to protect them self. What happened to Remple is 100% a penalty by the letter of the rules. You are 100% wrong.

I Think you are not reading the rules correctly, you are omitting the initial part of the rule: "Article 4 — Unnecessary Roughness A player shall be penalized for any act of unnecessary roughness against an opponent, including but not limited to:" if you add in the:"Delivering a forcible blow to the long snapper while their head is down and they are in a vulnerable position and unable to protect them self," it reads a lot differently. A player shall be penalized for any act of unnecessary roughness against an opponent, including but not limited to Delivering a forcible blow to the long snapper while their head is down and they are in a vulnerable position and unable to protect them self. Meaning any of these three things will result in a penalty not all three must occur to elicit a penalty.

Maybe Jeffcoat coming back?

I'm calling you out- first there is the fact only you and fans of the riders defend that cheap shot- take that how ever you want. Couple that with the entire history of your posts and the pattern they show. The guy is running at him full steam before Remple lifts his head- and contact is immediate those first few steps he's already been engaged- what ever you see is what you choose to see that fits your ever slanted narrative- same ******* story every time.

You must be watching a different play because those 2-3 steps with his head up is because he's getting trucked. Dirty hit by dirty player coached by a dirty coach from a team full of dirty POS. You keep on twisting your logic and facts in defending everyone but "your team". Seriously, just drop the pretence already, it just seems like you're trolling at this point.

Whatever- i just want the bombers to show up mad, play with a major chip on their shoulders, play on the edge for once, push them around, kick the **** of that pretend team and piss in their cereal while doing it.

Toronto...

And we lost the lowly 1 win Argos(that one win being... us FFS)... and a thrown into the fire back up QB for three quarters in the Ticats... So high and do low.

FFS Tburg why don't you just go and drop all pretense- you twist and bend and make up all sorts of excuses defending other teams, slagging the Bombers every time you can and snidly dismissing anyone who calls you out on it... It was clearly a cheap shot.. his head was moving up because he was getting trucked... if called that would of given us a fresh set of downs and a 3-7 point swing.

Me too, when we were in the east I felt that the riders were my second fav team- but rf.com and the fact we moved back west- has strained that considerably.

You should take that to riderfans- they need some of that over there.

I was fully expecting a loss. then we were winning and we pinned them back at the 5yd line... a little hope flashed- i should know better...

No worries- it was really subtle. I missed it at first too.

Wrong thread- take that **** over there. New thread- flush and move on.

I think that gif was supposed to be in jest.

GTFO here with that logic. J/K -is it the same posters making the same claims? Or are you lumping the whole of MBB together? if it's the latter- then you get nothing but a shambling, non-coherent, constant stream of conflicting sentiments. Proceed at your own peril.

Figures- a rider fan going on to a football fan site looking for objectivity, so dumb. Thank you for reinforcing that stereotype! Dumb-ass.

The worst part of this week is going to be TSN and CFl going to sucking the ol' rider dong. for example: 81 yards! O.M.F.G straight out BALLIN'! SMH.

No doubt that t he riders were the beneficiaries of some pretty egregious non-calls and marginal calls against us.

******* refs did.

Rewatch that drive again... watch how many times they got a first down because of a non-call on an egregious hold... the one where Fajita runs of the left tackle... our D-end couldn't get to him because... holding- the guy got mugged. A few of those throws? holding... not much you can do as a defense if your pressure is negated by non-called holding...

They Won by two points... against strevs and Augustine... with no holding calls at all... you call a ******* fair game... we would have destroyed them. for real? pile of dog **** maybe.

Two first downs where c.f. got the corner because of holding... completed passes because of holding... a defense can only do so much... if they are not getting pressure the riders are going to make plays all day... Yeah- I am not going to put this one on ritchie hall- there were several times that drive at crucial times where they got ******* jobbed by the refs...