-
Posts
9,499 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by Wanna-B-Fanboy
-
GDT: Edmonton @ Winnipeg June 27, 2019
Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Rich's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
That's the spirit! -
GDT: Edmonton @ Winnipeg June 27, 2019
Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Rich's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
yeah- they are both wrong. Degrees of wrongness does not change that. On the flip side degrees of rightness(?): Mouse ≠ Rat = correct Mouse ≠ Giraffe ≠ more correct -
GDT: Edmonton @ Winnipeg June 27, 2019
Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Rich's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I think the main point he was made in the bold section above. The ridiculousness of his statement was just to... actually I have no clue what his reason was- it was pretty funny though. Anyways- you can equate the two statements as there is no way to prove the statements short of pinpoint accuracy in space/time location technology between multiverses/dimensions. -
It seems kind of innocuous though, as it unfolds right in front of our eyes. It's certainly plausible if or when things get worse now, that 30-40 years in the future, people are going to be questioning why did people let this
-
Bryan Burnham
-
This does not look humane @ all
-
Funny, I was just thinking why the have such a fascination sister/auntie ******* chugging beers.
-
God damn it . Chamblin is going to get fired before we play them... and they are going to be much better...
-
GDT: Edmonton @ Winnipeg June 27, 2019
Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Rich's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I know right!? If only Reilly would have punched that goal line stance in for a TD. -
argos by 5
-
Awesome news.
-
I thought his suspension would have been lifted the same time someone else's was.
-
After all this you still haven't contributed anything that is credible. I would love to have a discussion with you about this, but you are not offering up anything that is supported by facts. Keep on trying though, it's always entertaining to see your posts.
-
Yup. You go for the TD. Maybe that was the time not to do the same QB sneak up the middle.... hit a different gap.
-
No one thought it was the same picture.
-
Well yeah. That is his point. What is yours?
-
lol, only someone completely dense would think it's the same picture used in both, it's obviously not, but the conditions were the same in 1917 for those of you who aren't smart enough to figure that out.
-
First off- no need to start with the name calling. Secondly, that is faulty logic- you are saying that the conditions were the same in both photos to discount the "alarmist", someone points out the absence of snow from the recent pic that was found in the 1984 pic (underscoring the argument of climate crisis) and you just insult him. That is not a good way to foster a constructive discussion and it paints you as a (which you are not, it just makes you look like one).
-
Back what up? you linked to the an information page of Austria's national weather service.
-
GDT: Edmonton @ Winnipeg June 27, 2019
Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Rich's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
I think @AKAChip is saying that the Bomber Offence is really good at scoring, despite having Nichols as an "anchor" to hold the offence back. That if you were to put in a better quarter back - they would score more and more consistently. He's not wrong, a better QB would. Who he considers as better than Nichols? No clue, you'd have to ask him. -
It may have been a mistake to move to the west... if we were still in the east these past few years... it's a strong chance that the GC drought would have ended already.
-
Good catch- I wonder if there has been any explanation for that. Looking forward to a notrickszone spin on that. At a cursory glance- the website is not credible and the graph... I don't even know what t hat graph is suppose to show. I did notice the "charity tip jar" link at the bottom of that chart. Also, what "wild claim" are you demanding data for? C'mon man- that is a **** site that purposely misleads and cherry picks data and presents data in a dishonest and distorted manner. It's been discredited and debunked many times in this thread alone. How do you expect us to take your arguments and points seriously when you keep trotting out the same shitty support of your "facts". I would love it if you were right and that all this is "alarmist" stuff. I want to be able to have a good honest discussion with you about Climate Crisis, but we can't have that dialogue if you keep using dodgy sources and thoroughly discredited propaganda websites as support for your view point.
-
GDT: Edmonton @ Winnipeg June 27, 2019
Wanna-B-Fanboy replied to Rich's topic in Blue Bomber Discussion
Hopefully the same- otherwise you need to see your doctor. 😁