Wanna-B-Fanboy

I loved the part where he wouldn't answer if he talked to a third party about the Mueller probe

Kelly Anne Conway now? Why are you quoting a serial liar now? Anyways I don't see anything that is.... "fake news" or "alternative facts" please let me know What to look out for. I am not too familiar with Jordan's schitck. I thoughtful was a pretty funny segment. C'mon - you didn't find the airhorn in the protest students face funny? That was comedic gold. And I totally respect Jordan more, after that clip where he admits that he was wrong about the gay wedding cake. It was refreshing to watch some state an opinion... listen to what someone else has to say... and is open minded to change their stance on something.

Why? he is voicing his opinion and how he was offended. Is that not his right? I fail to see that as "besmirching" his reputation. You know that Murray Sinclair is Aboriginal right...?

I will go and give him a fair shake and check him out. Agreed, maybe he's not, but when you lump him in with Mark should've and Milo, and that tweet from Murray- I did jump to conclusions. That tweet though., was racist.

Well that's shitty. I hope that gets tossed out.

You know it's the middle of the off-season when... C'mon guys let's not devolve into rideresque behaviour. 😀😁😁

That is their shtick- don't fall for it.

Awesome. Looking forward to your future contributions.

Thanks again for your input. Really apprwciate it man.

Thank you for your contribution. That was awesome.

That is exactly what you are doing. "Godwin's law (or Godwin's rule of Hitler analogies)[1][2] is an Internet adage asserting that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1";[2][3] that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or his deeds, the point at which effectively the discussion or thread often ends." Well done- you beat them to the punch. Who like Murray SInclair? Wow- jordan peterson, milo yiannopoulos and mark shouldice- you really should look them up before you defend them and berate those that are critical of them.

People have shown you many things to the contrary- you just choose to ignore them.

And this is why you argument is fatally flawed- you are making a very difficult and complex issue- into a 1 dimensional, trivial yes or no.

You don't have to use hyperbole, no need to become a banana republic. It's pretty much similar to Bernie's 32 trillion plan.: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/7/30/17631240/medicare-for-all-bernie-sanders-32-trillion-cost-voxcare The US will never became Venezuela- never mind the fox talking points. LOL? Good discourse... good discourse...

It's sad- the only thing worse than the Justin Trudeau Liberal government... is the conservative party of Canada.

Why wouldn't one call them ideas? please elaborate. Interesting- what are the "tried and failed many times" ideas she has? Why NK? Why Venezuala? Actually I didn't.

Me too! I love AOC- she's awesome. Her ideas are great and she seems to be a champion for the middle/working class. Also- because she is a young, non-white, woman in an elected position of power- she is the new Alt-right boogeyman. LOVE it. Everytime she speaks- Alt-right head's explode.

I have thought about it when he was released from Sask. was on the fence then about it... Given how much (lack thereof) he was a distraction and head case over there... I would sign him. He showed growth in Tor. and I would assume he would show more with the Bombers.

Too many people. Should have stated manmade climate change. Are you sure your not a closet Democrat? Cuz now you are quoting AOC. 😀😀

I wasn't the one making the statement. You were. Therefore- did you mean natural or man made?

So... you're saying that the Earth is on a cooling trend? AHA! Climate change deniers aren't trolls after all! They don't have their heads buried in their asses!

So.... you're not a closet democrat?

If you are going to argue over semantics, then you need to clearly define what Gender pay gap is. From "show me something where a big company like Wal-Mart or Costco pays a female cashier 15 dollars an hour and a male cashier 18 dollars an hour" - you will find it difficult to show GPG, because it is more complicated than that.