Wanna-B-Fanboy

WOuld it be wrong if Walters didn't do his due diligence and at least looked into the BLM situation? he is probably the best QB in the league and he is ready to go to a team not named Calgary. Freed up money from Chung and Goosen... that would cover the difference between Nichols' salary and BLMs.... just saying...

I am so sorry guys- was in a meeting and posted that- didn't realize it was that unclear of a message- holy was it ever lol. anyways- just a thought that popped into my head. no actual transaction. sorry for the confusion.

Damn autocorrect... BLM

Wishful thinking

Nichols traded to sask and Bombers sign HIM at a discounted 650k over three years?

If the Bombers grab Walker- that would open things WIDE open for Adams and make our offense crazy good. Adams is a good receiver but not a legit #1. Behind a legit #1 I think Adams will be much more effective.

Good point.

Wow- wth happened there?

I think Edm and Sask are going to be battling for the dumpster fire next year.

no kidding- I don't blame him... they failed to protect him and I think that had a part in his leaving.

I did. Oh- I was hoping for your own words and work. ah well. Thanks anyways.

Thanks for your views on this. Keep up the great work. That is really interesting- I would love to see the moath on this- could you please point me in the right direction of your support?

Interesting- if you take what you posted relating temperature and compare it to this graph of CO2... ... If you correlate those peaks of temperatue (2 - 2.75 C) add in that last peak and we might be looking at... what 4-7 degress? Maybe you should sound those alarm bells.

yes. yes it is. It is textbook racism. This is derailing the gender pay gap discussion- maybe we should trim this issue off to a new thread?

Wow? C'mon man that is pretty much on brand for these assholes. Shocked- no; pissed off and angry- yup.

I think you are knit-picking a little hard at those semantics.

Good point. But if took on BLM or MR we have to move on from Nichols.

If we had a chance at BLM or MR... should we at least try for it? Wouldn't that move make the team better?

Anyways- I walked back the JP being a racist- he's not. But that tweet of his- totally racist. He's not dumb, so wasn't an accident. So if not racist- then race-baiting? which is worse? Sorry- I don't buy the "out of context" argument - that is a cheap out. But sure- continue to defend that tweet as not being racist, have fun with that. First off. there is no "Alt-left" it is just a childish made up moniker made up by Trump to justify the white supremacists in Charlottesville- so go ahead, keep using that too. https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-alt-left/ https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/16/politics/what-is-alt-left/index.html It's a "made-up term" used by people on the right to "suggest there is a similar movement on the left," Segal said. But there's no equivalent with the anti-Semitic and bigoted groups that call themselves "alt-right", he said. So...Sinclair takes umbrage with the tweet and is offended by it , because it is OBVIOUSLY racist and he is virtue signaling? Yeah we can disagree with that one- you can continue defending the racist tweet all you want and call out Senator Sinclair for being offended by that, that is your prerogative.

Ask questions- absolutely. But your questions are disingenuous- they are not meant to promote discussion or further a scientific cause - it's always cherry-picking a small data point and discarding THE ENTIRE theory that thousands of scientists agree upon. It is a threat when people try and sow doubt and are unwitting participants of a disinformation campaign. It's like all those people that sowed doubt on cigarette smoking severely increases your chances at lung and heart disease- it's ****. So yeah- people should be scared of that, when disinformation on sound science leads us away from making good decisions from an evidence based approach. and the stakes are considerably higher now. "LOL" good discourse, good discourse. you keep it up- smug looks good on you.

But that is the thing- AGW, is our watershed moment- she was just trying to draw a parallel between how the Whole of America can together and worked together after Pearl Harbour was bombed- which is true, it';s going to take everyone pulling together to combat AGW. No hyperbole there. The Pinocchios were for her statement about the 21 trillion being absorbed by pentagon spending- which is wrong. Is that what you were refering to? WHy is it unrealistic? did you even read the article link I posted? It is a well written article. But they do have that money though... you just need to shift priories. So laugh all you want- it is possible. Thanks for your nonsensical reply- always appreciate it.

If you are fine with the science on the Earth being round, then why is man-made climate change such a stretch for you? I doubt it, from your posts you seem to confuse the two- often.

How often do you question that the Earth is round? Do you know the difference between climate and weather?

There is no way there is any "misandry" here in this thread- "Attempts to make misandry the equivalent of misogyny rely on two misconceptions: first, that gender is a spectrum as opposed to a hierarchy; and second, that victimhood is in fact a source of power and privilege." here is an interesting article- I figure you will not even bother giving it a read, but it's there anyways. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/misandry-men-hate-crime-women-sexism-racism-feminism-a8586591.html