Wanna-B-Fanboy

Not sure which rider terms you are talking about... I don’t see "sister-wife", "brother-husband", or "at least still have these two left" when pointing to their teeth.

The only parody of football is the one in the crotch of Canada.

My daughter's green belt testing draws more fans than the argos.

To be fair though, . A "classic" NBA game and Pro PickleBall > Argos football.

Yes, I heard you. That's why I conceded the point, because we are not dscussing the same thing.

Sorry, I was under the assumption that we were talking about increased productivity.

Isn't that a loss in opportunity? I mean a good owner/manager would recognize that effort and increased productivity to perhaps better use it to benefit the company.

Or increase the wage of those that still have to go in. In a work place where you have a certain segment of the work force that has transitioned to WFH, yet another segment that continues to go into work on a daily basis- its unfair to those that are still required to go into work, that the WFH group gets the benefits of saving on, parking, transportation costs, the additional time lost when commuting to and from work, while wages remain the same. It just creates a further divide in equitable wages between certain groups. Don't get me wrong, I am all in favour of WFH if the work can be done almost or as well as from work. I am a huge advocate of WFH and see the huge benefits for both employees and employers. I just feel that those that are still required to go into work are being "left behind". If anything i would rather the employers pony up some sort of bonus for those thatvhave to go into work to offset the cost and time of commuting, than reduce the wages of those that are WFH. I think that would be fair. I also agree with you @Richon all your other points.

I am all for WFH, I think it's great, especially when used in an organization as a hybrid work force- be it department or employee. However, the WFH employees should have their wages reduced or those that go into work, should get a raise/ bonus or what ever.

"Rising above the DB..." Sit the **** down DF, he was in front of the db...

Can youbcall a horse tackle on a defensive end, just asking for a friend... lol... Call the police, there is a mugging in progress.. lol

They were so stunned that it was called a TD in the first place... CC crew saying , "WTAF....?"

Oh boy... the officiating this year is ******* brutal... Not just against us... I am sure that its been equally brutal for everyone.

No! There goes the egg.

Now... how the **** did the ref even call that a TD... ffs

Mack with the push off...

44 is always last one on the tackle... when the carrier is down...

Miltry is dirty AF

Where's the facemask with that holding?

Never going to get called with this crew

Jefferson sack Cofaj if he wasn't mugged...

Took Stanback as my lock of the week... I will be happy to take the third strike if it means a shut out for the lolettes

SCHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOEN

I think the rule was changed this year to 15