Jump to content

szaroz71

Members
  • Posts

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

742 profile views

szaroz71's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

54

Reputation

  1. You're absolutely right. I know where I am... all I was saying was maybe this wasnt the right forum to start up that discussion. There was a lot of humble pie being eaten and some sincere congratulations posted here... but you're right, your territory, your rules. Congrats again. Good luck in the WF!
  2. Did you read my earlier post on this very thread... the one where I congratulated everyone here without a single excuse? And while there are no doubt angry fans on RF... there is an entire thread there congratulating the Bombers on their win.
  3. I fail to see the need for this in this thread. We have come here and humbly congratulated Bomber fans on the win. Its actually been quite civil. Yet you feel the need to stir things up... craving attention? Things must be pretty quiet over in the Eastside.
  4. I don't understand. You want my name and number? Lol... err... not sure I'm ready for that yet... maybe buy me a drink first!
  5. Congratulations on the win. No excuses here... (other than dumping hot wing sauce on my jersey before the game and the local beer store was out of Pilsner.. All signs we pointing to something bad before kickoff lol) I think we had a chance to win the game but Winnipeg made the bigger plays and we didn't. That was the difference. Again, congratulations, Good luck in the WSF. Should be a hard hitter.
  6. Drive safe. Hopefully the road conditions are good this weekend.
  7. And yet here you are, taking the time to upload your little picture you've been saving. Sounds like you care.
  8. While I'll be cheering for the RedBlacks, I also think the Bombers win this one. Nichols seems to be playing with more confidence and your D is looking better as well. That... and Ottawa is due for a loss. (But Go Ottawa) 😝
  9. Why? Other than you trying to be insulting, it says 3 shall be identified as quarterbacks. What part of that do you not comprehend?
  10. Well, this is what is written... Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players. ...the way I interpreted this, was that each team had to have 3 players identified as QB, whether they are QB's or not, but they had to have 3 listed on the roster. Not saying that I am right, just how I read it. I guess we'll see when Hamilton posts their lineup for game day.
  11. Yes, maximum 44 players, with 3 of them who shall be identified as quarterbacks I can read the rules just fine.
  12. It says 3 players "shall be identified as quarterbacks". Who's having trouble with English?
  13. I thought they still have to have 3 players listed as qb... even if only 2 are actually qb. This is from the CFL game rule ratio. Each team may have a maximum of 44 players, including 3 players who shall be identified as quarterbacks and 41 other players, of whom not more than 20 may be international players.
  14. I think your winning streak comes to an end today. As much as I would like to see Calgary stumble again, I just can't see it happening.
  15. That was actually pretty funny...
×
×
  • Create New...