SpeedFlex27

We can say the team played badly if we lose & no one should take offense as it would be true.

I'm just going to leave this alone.

Well, I'm certainly not the only one here who name calls. When Skunk makes a statement that makes little or no sense & continues to do so then should I or anyone else just say, "Thanks for your input?"

I do think if the league does a financial audit & they find improprieties then the Als should be subject to penalties like the other teams would be. However, your point is valid. Would the CFL penalize the new owners of the Als? Probably not.

If true, I don't see how the Als can claim that they took care of the circumventing the cap problem by firing Reed. He still cheated & therefore the Als should be subjected to whatever financial & player penalty that is appropriate. What message does it send to teams that don't cheat that nothing will happen to an organization if it does?

If they used QB Efficiency then he'd be Number 1. They used passing yards instead.

Dude, are you seriously that....??? Never mind.

Well, says the guy who ******* on every thread & every post about Nichols & never stops. Look in the mirror. You can't even interpret the stats right. You are a clown.

Nichols QB Efficiency is 126.0 while Davis is 75.1. Nichols has completed 69.4% of his passes to Davis 66.0. The passing stats are set up by passing yard totals but not who is the fourth best or 6th best qb in the CFL. Skunk seriously saying Nichols as Number 6 is ludicrous.

What fact? Cherry picking stats??? We've already seen that yardage isn't the be all or end all. Why not mention his TD to intercept numbers. His QB Efficiency? His won-lost record?? Because you have no clue.

No, he wasn't. That's Skunk. As a fan, he stinks as bad as Davis is a qb.

Arbuckle is a good one. Of all the new qbs that have burst upon the scene, he has the chance to be the best as he's the product of the QB Machine in Calgary.

Oh FFS. You're clueless. Check out his QB Rating. Then check out Nichols. As you don't know, the QB Ratings takes his entire performance into consideration. So, his passing stats & wins. You sound more & more stupid with every post you make.

Disagree with your assessment of Arbuckle. He played well & his receivers did not. So many dropped passes & fumbles. Special teams cover teams were awful. Arbuckle played well enough to win. Other areas of concern on that team.

How that turkey got to where he was while virtually failing at every level as he tripped his way up the coaching & management ladder is truly amazing.

Just change the logo & suddenly we travel back in time to 2013. #nightmares

Reed a cheat with expenses & circumventing the cap? Consequences. There... HAS TO BE.... consequences.

Like I said, the same people continually.

Khari better watch his back. Joe Mack is back. (Hey that rhymes). Joe will throw him under the bus & run him over 4 times.

Some fans will never be satisfied, Booch. To them, the backup is always the better option no matter what.

Arbuckle played a very strong game but his receivers stunk all night. Especially Rogers. Ambles made some stupid plays as well. The Stamps Special Teams were Jekyll & Hyde all game long. Had a chance to bury the Cats early but let it get away.

Max Hall to teach qbs how to snort coke so they don't feel their pain.

At that point, yes. LaPo would have probably gone neo-con.

Barker is the Ti Cat GM, I believe. So, he'd probably stay put.

He should have played, I agree. But what would have LaPo called? Continual hand off to Harris, screens, slants & hitches.