Tiny759

If the government and cfl can not reach a deal, I feel like this could be the end. Putting themselves in a Leveraged position could help for next year, but having the high amount of debt could be hard to overcome since it was reported the cfl lost $20m/year. Sad to watch this potentially fold out.

I’ll give cabin in the woods a try

Almost as good as Aaron Hargreaves

Fun fact, I did sit beside his girlfriend at a game once. Rory kohlerts mother and family was there too.

Greatest WR the bombers ever drafted 😂

There shall be no Jade Etienne slander on this page!

Now this gave me a good laugh

Ok and that’s fine, owning one is not for everybody. But there is a couple point you made that aren’t consistent I would say. First off, collecting is one reason people own a restricted gun, but so is target shooting and competition shooting. As for “only military and law enforcement” should have these types of guns, I don’t think you understand the difference between what a military use and what is made available to public. Most of the guns banned were restricted guns, meaning no you can’t hunt with them. But they are not used in military, only made to look like a model. Restricted guns are usually semi, and for example an M16 is chambered in .223. That’s barely enough to take down a deer. In fact, the hunting rifles that are Not being banned will most likely appear in a higher caliber. And yes these hunting rifles can be semi-auto too. These guns aren’t automatic like you see in military or in call of duty. Those are prohibited in Canada and have been since the 1970/1980s (I cant remember the exact year). Too add, restricted and non-restricted guns have a maximum magazine size of of 5. While handguns have 10. The ruger mini 14 can hold 10 too since it fits a certain handgun magazine but it’s illegal to do so. The only type of guns that don’t have a limit on magazine size, is rim-fire guns. These are chambered in a .22 and below. (I do think this should be brought to the 5 magazine limit too) so to sum up, these guns are not used by military, these aren’t call of duty guns, they are guns which are classified as restricted, which are being used for collecting, target and competition, but not hunting.

I’m going to assume you don’t own any guns based of this post?

Ok

Same here, both posters seem to be biased in their own ways. Although it’s fun to read.

👌and Mexico is gonna pay for it 👌

Idk if he wants to ban all, I’m curious to see how far he will continue to push this.

Hey not gonna disagree with that, just clarifying that the term “assault weapon” is not a legally defined term in Canadian firearms legislation, even though Trudeau and others like to use that term.

I agree with you on the democracy approach and it should be brought in by a legislative bill and voted on, but the term you use “assault weapons” is not a legally defined term in Canadian firearms legislation.

What a weird comment lol

Not an upcoming movie, but does anybody have some good horror movie recommendations? Looking for something to watch late at night.

I’ve been spending too much time in the political threads, what’s the overall thoughts on the draft? I was unable to watch.

So I’m actually more inclined to to agree with you on the first part. The reason I mentioned special permit is for a few reasons. 1) I would classify those as explosives, and with buying all explosives, that should require extra licenses, 2) I should’ve clarified more, the ones that would be able to acquire them would be museums or special shooting ranges. Obviously at the museum they would have to be “tweaked” so they are unable to fire. Shooting ranges would be high regulated. As for the need, well depends how you value needs. For a collector, target shooter or competitor, it could be a need. If we wanted too, we could get into what are only true needs are, food, water and shelter. the reason people are against this ban, is because the guns banned, (excluding the RPG) are no different for the most from a “hunting rifle”. So the ban takes away property from law abiding citizens, while putting a bandage on a much larger problem. Anti gun people will love it and pro-gun people will hate it. And when a conservative gets into power again, the rules will most likely change, and the reactions will be the opposite. And this cycle will continue on for a long time. Not much any of us can do about this but agree to disagree.

First off, I made a grammar/spelling mistake, sue me. And yes there are controls, but when someone who is not allowed to buy guns in Canada, can go to the states buy a gun and smuggle it in, there has to be a better control system because that shouldn’t be happening. I would say that is the responsibility of both US and Canadian governments. And yes criminals don’t follow laws, that’s why they are criminals.

So here are my thoughts on this, in regards to the grenade launcher and rocket-propelled projectile, I actually do believe those should require an extra class, and not fall under the restricted class. I also believe for them to require a special permit, that would require a justifiable use for them, which would most likely lead to the permit never being authorized. As for the M16, or these “style” of guns, they are very similar to hunting rifles. I’ll go over a few differences. First off the M16 is restricted while the “hunting rifle” is non-restricted. So no you can’t hunt with them. The second difference is the the way they look, the M16 was based off the look of the AR-15. There aren’t many more differences then that. The M16 being cambered in .223 is less then my 7mm or .308. So I do think the liberals should go for it all and say ban all guns, I would have more respect if they were more straight up. As for “needs” who are you to determine what are a persons needs? There are collected, target shooting, competitive.

The “AR-15” is just a style of the gun. Canada does not have an open policy on gun. The laws that are in place are actually pretty good. With having different classes for guns, non-restricted, restricted, and prohibited. What needs to change is the enforcement of laws. Control at boarders needs to happen to not allow illegal guns to enter.

So ban all guns? I believe that’s bad policy.

The government uses that term, but it’s a broad term that they don’t define. The guns that are used in the military, which would be automatic, are already prohibited in Canada.

Couple problems with this, what is a “military grade assault rifle”? And who now determines market value for the guns.