-
Posts
6,640 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Articles
Everything posted by Rich
-
-
Yep, the salary will be around 900k annually. This isn't negotiable. Bonuses can be 10% (bonuses are just part of the salary paid up front). The rest is bonuses.
-
Glad to see him sign. No burning of the 1st year of his ELC. Also delaying on when he would have to be protected for any possible expansion draft. Will be exciting to watch him play next year.
-
http://www.bluebombers.com/2016/04/11/winnipeg-football-club-generates-7-1-million-of-net-profits-from-103rd-grey-cup/
-
Draft odds of each team
-
Game 81 : Jets @ Sharks - West Coast Story
Rich replied to FrostyWinnipeg's topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
Maurice implied that you shouldn't read too much into that win. San Jose has a playoff spot wrapped up and we're basically just going through the motions. It was a sloppy game by both teams. We certainly didn't beat San Jose at their best. -
I believe first tie breaker is number of wins then non OT wins.
-
I cannot stand the Sportsnet panel. Their on air talent are just unlikeable for the most part. Not a fan of their play by play teams either. It will be interesting to see what happens when this contract is up. Whether TSN gets hockey back or it stays with Sportsnet, it will be at a reduced cost. Big cap implications when TV money decreases. Hopefully the Canadian dollar has rebounded by then.
-
New Tallest Building In Winnipeg Announced
Rich replied to The Unknown Poster's topic in General Discussion
400 apartments ... where are these people going to park? You would think they'd need to expand the existing underground parkade, acquire some of the Impark lots next to Winnipeg Square and build a parkade up, or designate a few of the floors of the new building as parking. -
Actually, that article goes on to say that this particular drug is not yet banned in the NHL, and they wouldn't add a drug to the banned list mid-season. So for now, they would be okay.
-
http://www.tsn.ca/talent/report-russian-hockey-hit-by-mass-doping-scandal-1.465931
-
Always take BPA. Most of these players are years away from playing in the NHL, especially defensemen. Who knows what your needs will be down the road.
-
Interesting though with all the discussion on tanking and losing is winning and winning is losing for the Jets lately.
-
Don't think so. In fact, even if a player ends the year in the AHL, I believe he is considered back in the NHL to start the next season and must clear waivers if he is sent down again.
-
Game 80 : Jets @ Duck, You Sucker!
Rich replied to FrostyWinnipeg's topic in Winnipeg Jets Discussion
Carlyle retired after Teemu's rookie season, and I believe Teemu held off one more year after that before switching to #8. The thing is, that rookie year was very special, and a lot of people will always associate him with #13 (me included). -
Most people and pundits tend to think the Jets are unlikely to make the playoffs again next year. Even if you don't, many would argue that Pav isn't good enough for you to be a good playoff team. With both of those in mind, this is the order I would try to deal with the goalies: Trade Pav if you can. Would even retain $1 - 2M for his last year if it makes him more attractive as a backup. Trade Hutch if you can. You are probably only getting a 5 - 7th round pick for him. If you can't trade either of them, re-sign Hutch as an RFA and send him down at the end of training camp where he is less likely to be picked up on waivers. Let him backup Comrie for the year. We've seen what Hutch can do. I think an NHL backup is his ceiling, so I'm not so concerned about him getting less playing time with the Moose. Comrie's development is more important. I'm fine with either Helle/ Pav or Helle/ Hutch for next season. Going back to Pav / Hutch would be pointless IMO. Neither is the future and what more can Helle learn with the Moose.
-
Realistically, who is going to trade a top 10 pick for a late first and early second? Would you make that trade if you were wearing the other GM hat?
-
Points over 60 minutes played where the minutes are not PP or PK. It is used to measure points per minute and not penalize people on the PK or give the advantage to people who get PP time. A stat to use in conjunction with others.
-
Pretty good article on it here. http://www.silversevensens.com/2015/6/10/8737195/nhl-buyout-rules-refresher-guide
-
It can be done but there is a cap penalty if you do, so it isn't done often. Where in the last CBA they let you buy out 2 contracts that wouldn't count against the cap.
-
Interesting article from Willie Mitchell of the Florida Panthers. He is out with the 7th concussion of his career at the age of 38 (39 later this month). http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/panthers-mitchell-talks-concussions-future-hockey/ He claims no one will speak publicly, but in the locker room, the players want the NHL to crack down and dish out more severe penalties to head shots. I'm all for harsher suspensions, but you have to wonder where the NHLPA stands on this. It seems that almost any suspension that is more then 5 - 10 games is appealed. They chose (or Raffi chose) not to appeal the Torres suspension earlier this year for 41 games for a head shot. Yet they appealed the Wideman hit on referee Don Henderson who is still out with a concussion. Players want harsher discipline for this dirty stuff in the game, stop appealing suspensions.
-
An article on the intersection of the WWE and CFL from a football blog. http://3downnation.com/2016/04/04/two-strange-peas-in-one-pod-the-intersection-of-cfl-and-wwe-fandom/
-
-