Jump to content

Mike

Administrators
  • Posts

    9,491
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Mike

  1. But really though, that game was what it was - the two worst teams in the league battling to see who wasn't going to blow it. Coaching stood out as incredibly poor all around last night, whether it be the offensive game plans, the lack of adjustments or the overall game management (on one side) Part of me hopes Chris Jones wises up and starts bringing a four man rush against us, one less guy for our receivers to deal with in the secondary and our OL will shut them down anyways. Their ends are athletic and a challenge, but their interior is not viewed as a threat by any means. Their secondary didn't play as bad as I was expecting last night, but at the same time, Durant didn't really challenge them much and the one time he did, it was an exceptionally poor showing by Gainey (who is supposed to be the leader) who let Cunningham waltz into the end zone. I'm not as high on the Riders OL as most were after last night either, Glenn did a good job of getting the ball out but he was facing pressure from that right side all night and had the pocket collapse numerous times. Our interior defensive line is also going to be way more disruptive than Montreal's was. The only thing I'm concerned about is the health of our defensive backs right now - doesn't sound like Bruce Johnson is going to go, but I sure hope Leggett can get in there and play. That would be a difference maker for us.
  2. ... well, I mean ... Chris Jones? Let's just say easily the most unlikable player.
  3. I like Draftkings far better. I'm not interested in "fantasy football", I'm interested in being profitable and a kicker adds way too much luck into that equation. I'm taking week 1 as a research week to see how everyone does, who lines up where, etc then it's on to my goal to profit for the year. Week 1 Lineups: Reilly/Johnson/Criner/Daniels/Toliver/Zylstra/Montreal D Durant/Messam/Jackson/Jorden/Criner/Toliver/Montreal D
  4. I actually thought Montreal got a decent amount of pressure in the first quarter, they were forcing his hand quite a bit. Did I hear correctly that McAdoo called 93% pass in the first half? Saskatchewan is just a terribly coached football team. We should take them to the cleaners next week.
  5. This poll has way too many options, I've been staring at it for a few minutes trying to figure out what to pick and I just have no idea. It was a horrible call. The ball doesn't have to just break the goal line, it has to break the goal line while a player has possession and once that ball starts moving to that extent, it's not possession anymore.
  6. Goooooo Montreal!
  7. You're lucky I don't give you a warning for inappropriate and foul language.
  8. I do not like it whatsoever but a lot of people seem to.
  9. If I remember correctly you're also a redhead.
  10. It's literally one of the more interesting discussions we've had on this board in the past little while, but if you don't like hearing about the processes of a front office from a guy like Booch who would most certainly know ... to each their own.
  11. The funny thing is, I remember the opposite argument when Joe Mack didn't do it at all. It's not highly unusual that we run open camps at all. Saskatchewan runs just as many open cam ... ah, dammit.
  12. Can't say I agree with that. Plenty of teams operate like that. Besides ... what would that have to do with anything, even if it were true? There are probably more receivers than nearly any other position in football and we can't find ANY?
  13. Man can we ever not scout receivers. Even Washington was not a find of ours. What is it with this group of scouts? Glad Thorpe is sticking around.
  14. My top 10 would be ... Mitchell, Reilly, Bowman, Hughes, Lawrence, Dennis, Bond, Elimimian, Leggett and Sewell Rounding out the top 20 is a bit harder but I'd go Messam, Arceneaux, Roosevelt, Daniels, Lemon, Kanneh, Singleton, Chick, Harris and Jackson
  15. Wasn't a fan of it. Few good ones, mostly a bunch of meh.
  16. 88, 82 and 19 were all new. Tachinski was 82. He is also not black, so couldn't be 19.
  17. Flatlanders was fairly solid, although the layout made it difficult to move around. Lots of good beer options ... if anyone likes the hoppy stuff, the Double Juicy IPA by Garrison, Full Time IPA by Beau's or Side Cut NE IPA by Bridge are all good options in stock at the LC at the moment. Not mind-blowing, but better than most options you'll find here in the city.
  18. Mike

    Wrestling

    It's not just for you, you know. Bayley isn't my cup of tea, but she's the favorite wrestler of probably every little girl out there. She's insanely popular with the market she's meant for.
  19. Also ... Chris Rainey at 17 is a bit ridiculous. He's an interesting player, but he's not even prime-Brandon Banks level for what he does. Nice little piece to have. Jennings at 5 seems ridiculously high, I wouldn't have had him in the top 20. Naaman Roosevelt way too low. Abdul Kanneh being unranked is ridiculous, he's probably the best DB in the league. Top 3 at worst. John White quite a bit too far down the list for my liking. Toliver not being on the list is a bit strange too, he's one of the better receivers in the league.
  20. Sorenson ahead of Bond hahahahahaha hahahahahahaha HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
  21. I just don't see a way we don't have Jeffcoat and Johnson in the lineup. It wouldn't make a whole lot of sense.
  22. I can't see a world where we start JT and Hurl without dressing Poop.
  23. Bruce Johnson's hand was in a cast which makes me think he might be out a week? Fogg starts perhaps?
  24. Flanders/Fogg? Medlock, Jeffcoat, Flanders and Fogg as DI?
  25. Washington sounds like he's going to be the guy in week 1, thankfully.
×
×
  • Create New...