Mike

Yeah, seems like a solid card. It's really a shame that I look forward more to the RAW after WrestleMania than I do to WrestleMania itself these days. So tired of all these part time guys making the full timers play second fiddle on the biggest show of the year after they carry the company for the rest of the year. So stale.

Man oh man did the ending to the Rumble ever bum me out. Vince has to just be messing with the fans now. Reigns is such a major buzzkill.

A bit surprising, I think he has at least a little left in the tank. I don't see a fit here, but he could be a worthy add somewhere like in Calgary if Federkeil retires.

For a third of the price of their lawyer, I could come up with a defense that is just as reasonable as what he's put out there.

He makes good mad faces.

It's pretty much a lock that he's going to be in the Rumble and I just don't see how you do much in the way of selling him as the monster they want him to be unless he either wins it or gets eliminated in an abnormal way to set up his debut angle.

HOLLA IF YA HEAR ME But seriously, I think Joe is going to win the Rumble.

Oh, I'm certainly not complaining. I just take it in stride nowadays. I think I've gotten soft or something, because nothing really bothers me much anymore.

I don't disagree with what you're saying here, I just find it odd that this is something that you find "funny", seen as how you're more or less the exact same way, only you put a negative spin on everything.

Well ... you're certainly not going to start Demski AND Bagg, seen as how you have Roosevelt, Carter, Holley, Edwards and Collins on the roster. They aren't going to sit two of those guys. Crapigna doesn't count towards your ratio. Gaydosh, well ... good luck. That leaves you with Best, Clark, Francis, St. John, Labatte, Muamba and Bagg. Overall, not bad. But what happens when one of Best/Labatte goes down? Which they will.

We've seen how the "I swear he's not plan A" approach goes. (as an experienced veteran of it, let me tell you: it doesn't go well)

Somewhat underwhelmed but on the bright side, if we were going to recycle DBs from two teams right now, BC and Winnipeg are at the top of the list (with Calgary, as well) for recruiting those spots. Lankford, however ... why bother is my immediate opinion.

Me too, although I don't necessarily know if he's going to have a choice. You'd think with Bighill gone, it's a natural fit but I feel like at this point, if it was going to be an easy signing, it would be done.

Lokombo over Greenwood, please.

Personally, the game day thread works just fine for me. But I can see why those who enjoy the chat room would.

Kluchk isn't Migs, just for the record.

Jeez that 2013 Draft was bad. Sure would like to see the Bombers pursue Bo Lokombo in free agency though, that guy can ball. Could be a starter at LB for us. And a ratio breaker at that.

You bench your most consistent forward all year for a lack of effort, while you let a guy like Drew Stafford hog premium minutes while he game in game out skates around in the defensive zone like he's doing his best Ray Charles impression. Maurice is a lost cause. He's a terrible coach. PS - Pavelec sucked last night.

Well, it really depends (imo) on who we still sign of our own. Bass, Cummings, Burnett and Denmark are probably the only ones that we have a level of interest in. For me, at this point ... I'd be interested in some of the receivers out there, but that'd probably mean we have to cut Ryan Smith. The big one for me is the DT market. Between Cummings, Brooks, Laing, Johnson, Nevis and Hall ... there's going to be movement on that front and IMO, we NEED one of those guys.

that makes sense now. The text I got said "good news drunk: Nichols is back!" and I thought my friend was telling me he was worried I have a drinking problem. Turns out he has a texting problem.

Just signed him hehe

Just heard Nichols signed.

Big signing for the Bombers. If healthy, Adams is a 1500 yard receiver in this league.

I think it's great. It's nice to see the NHL actually have some guys with personality.