Mike

PS I really think this guy will be in the lineup sooner rather than later He's almost an ideal CFL defensive end.

In light of this Eric Martin signing, a couple other guys with NFL experience that fans should keep in mind are Denarius Moore and Austin Pettis.

I find these to be interesting comments from someone who has a QB in the family.

To me, Shologan/Thomas is a more than adequate rotation for the Canadian DT spot.

I'm not entirely interested in Martin as anything but a bit player.

No he is not. He's way bigger.

I bet he still ends up playing in the CFL. He could make himself a good amount of coin up here. Would imagine we'd be looking at dealing him to Ottawa though.

I hope the Riders lose by 95.

Yeah I'm not sure why people aren't buying into Harris, he's been phenomenal.

There's no way I'm benching Ryan Smith. Some may forget Smith hasn't played with Nichols yet so he hasn't had the same opportunities to work with a guy that is hitting on the deep ball as a guy like Dressler or Denmark. Smith spent the early portion of the season getting open downfield almost at will. He just didn't have a guy getting him the ball.

The thing about Nichols that I should say to give him credit: he hasn't been playing his best football. Three game winning streak and he can play better. Lots to get excited about!

I was ready to pull Nichols early on, he was playing like crap. Pulled it together but he's still playing average - with this D average is more than enough

Saskatchewan. And who cares. What team has the ability to find 5 Canadians worth starting elsewhere? anyone upset with Harris, Kohlert, Loffler, Westerman and Shologan starting for us?

And just for everyone else out there, I think you're pretty much bang on with that. I have no football background to draw from and I wouldn't consider myself very knowledgeable about the finer points of the x's and o's of the game.

http://cflmedia.ca/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=628&Itemid=6 Any of the links displayed on that page will have a PDF that displays the rosters broken down by starters, substitutes and scratches.

I'm trying to make a conscious effort to discuss things more with posters around here since there seems to be a contingent of people who views me as someone who simply attacks and degrades people I don't agree with. I can't say I agree with the criticism, but I'm making an effort to show as much patience as possible.

I'm not trying to be rude but I literally have no idea what you just said.

lol I literally just laid out the first week for you, but if you doubt me, go ahead.

Stats -> 2016 -> Post-Game Statistics Waiting on that apology.

Also, just to make a THIRD post, it's no coincidence that the only team dressing 2 backups is one of 2 teams with an all-Canadian line. Reason being is that if they suffer two injuries, not only do they need depth, but they need ratio assistance as well. Also, one more thing to be clear on: no team has used a DI spot on an offensive lineman in any game this year.

Oh and just to clarify the point I was trying to make: 1 team out of 9 is consistently dressing 2 backup offensive linemen that serve no purpose other than to serve as a backup offensive lineman. 2 teams out of 9 regularly dress 2 backups, but 1 of them is a designated long snapper. 6 out of 9 teams have consistently been dressing 1 backup lineman. And if you want to validate my claims, you can go look up the official scoring sheets at cflmedia.ca

The transaction page has nothing to do with anything, the 2-man reserve doesn't move from the active roster to a different area so your futile attempt to provide evidence to backup your claims means nothing. Week 1: Ottawa, BC, Toronto, Hamilton dressed 7 OL, everyone else dressed 6. Week 2: BC, Toronto, Hamilton dressed 7 OL, everyone else except Saskatchewan dressed 6, Saskatchewan dressed 5. The pattern remains consistent for the rest of the season to date, with variations here and there for injuries. The other thing to keep in mind is that Hamilton and BC both have a backup OL doing their long-snapping as opposed to Chad Rempel, who is not classified as an OL so while they're on the roster as backup OL, they're essentially only filling that role in name only. Nobody has dressed 8 OL this year. Nobody has dressed 7 OL AND a designated long-snapper either. You want to know where I got that information from? The official roster sheets that list game day rosters AND the 2-man reserve. Thanks.

If I provide you with this, will you apologize for being incredibly wrong and stop arguing a point that I know for fact is 100% wrong? Because I'll go through the work to do it if you will.

To be clear - Gary Lawless said on the radio last night that they're not actually done the part of the investigation related to the Riders paying unrostered players under the table. And to me, that's the biggest offense of all. So more punishments could be coming.

I'm not sure why we're talking about this as a big deal. He's a pass rusher.