Jump to content

Mike

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,491

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mike

  1. Mike
    We're getting one of Waud, Durant, Demski, Bodanis, Ackie or Murray-Lawrence if we stay at 11 so that should be enough reason to hold there unless the price is too reasonable to move up.
  2. Mike
    My guess is that if the Bombers won't be willing to move 15, they won't succeed. They won't get away with #11 + 2016 picks.
  3. Mike
    Order is based on overall record, other than Grey Cup finalist and winner I believe.
  4. Mike
    He's not on the roster so I'm guessing he's gonzo. He never was on the roster.
  5. Mike
    I don't know how early everyone else was going to come by, but I'll be in there by about 6 PM. Don't forget - we max out at 250 now, not 50 like on free agency day!
  6. Mike
    If there's a situation where we don't get Demski, that's got to be close to my favorite one.
  7. Mike
    #2 + rights to Bilukidi or Mulumba for BC #5 and Westerman. Hard not to think we'd be stretching our financial limits at least a little bit with a move like that but it would be funny to see JAB Westerman and JAM Westerman on the back of the jerseys.
  8. Mike
    That's not what Walters said. He said there is one guy they have as the consensus number one player on THEIR board. There's nothing to suggest that means Ottawa has the same guy in mind.
  9. Mike
    I think you will be correct.
  10. Mike
    I think Demski is worthy of going in the ten spot but if Ottawa keeps that selection, I see no sense in them using it on him. IMO, they'd be much better served using it on Shaq Lawrence or depth for behind Pruneau. It's questionable that they're even going to start ONE Canadian receiver (they could go 4 OL, Pruneau, Capiciotti and Shologan) and they already have Sinopoli, Carter and MacDonell.
  11. Mike
    He's ready to be a CFL contributor now but I don't see him as a day 1 starter at all. We don't need him to be. I see him being very much like Coombs - he'd get into certain sets just to get his feet wet. That being said, the OL we would select at number 2 would not be anywhere close to the project Goossen is. Worth pointing out - any of the three targets (Chungh, Mateas or Groulx) are ALL older than Goossen.
  12. Mike
    jim bender ✔ @bendersun If #bombers draft Demski, groom him for shot at #nfl, he would show his gratitude on the field. Draft O-lineman and lose their youngsters. 31m jim bender ✔ @bendersun The #bombers should draft Demski 1st, then get an O-lineman with 2nd pick. Seems like most of O-linemen are going to test #nfl waters 1st. 33m jim bender ✔ @bendersun Actually, #bombers biggest concern right now should be at LB, but there are no Muamba's in the draft #bringhimback 34m jim bender ✔ @bendersun The #bombers should actually draft Demski, who would become their answer to Cornish or Poplawski. Returns kicks well, too #nobrainer 36m jim bender ✔ @bendersun If #bombers draft an O-lineman 1st, it means they have no faith in Goossen, whom they drafted 1st last year or Neufeld, acquired in trade. Jim Bender with officially the worst analysis I have ever seen.
  13. Mike
    I think Chungh is probably regarded as the one with the highest ceiling.
  14. Mike
    I wouldn't trust that guy with my dinner reservation.
  15. Mike
    Or they just have depth. Barrett is a project, Jackson is pretty much toast, Foster sucks and Chambers/Watson are injury concerns.
  16. Mike
    The irony in all of this? The pick that Edmonton used to take Hus in 2013 was originally Saskatchewan's. And they dealt it in another awful trade (4th rounder + Matt O'Donnell for Greg Carr + 5th rounder)
  17. Mike
    This honestly has the makings of being the worst trade I've seen in a long, long time.
  18. Mike
    Certainly wasn't as sold on him as a future RT as the blogosphere is.
  19. Mike
    That is horrible. Like what are you doing.
  20. Mike
    One guy I keep finding that I like more and more - Ron Omara
  21. Mike
    If that was the offer, I don't think I could turn it down. That's a lot of pieces.
  22. Mike
    IMO, the Bombers are going to dictate the pace of the draft with their second pick. We can safely assume that Ottawa is going to go OL. If the Bombers pick an OL then you could very likely see an early run on OL (which seems to be the direction things are going in) and that's going to leave a skill player on the board for us at 11. The 6 OL (Groulx, Mateas, McEwen, Chungh, Ruby and Lavoie) will all likely go in the top 10 if there's a run. That means one of Durant, Demski, Waud, Ackie or Lawrence will be there at 11, at least. That's a win for us.
  23. Mike
    We don't start a Canadian RB and there's no plans to do so for the Bombers, so I think you gotta go best WR before taking an RB at 11. Don't need to start a Canadian RB in my opinion - he essentially gives you the ability to do three things - have your thunder / lightning backfield combo without burning a designated import spot, if you so choose - have a competent backup as opposed to a Carl Volny type if you're going to go with one feature back - give you the ability to play a full complement of import receivers in certain sets (you could get Stoudermire in on offense, etc) On top of all of that, he has starting RB potential. You could land yourself a legitimate ratio buster. Decent points, but I'd still go WR over RB at 11. I'd love him later in the draft though if he was available; just don't like the idea of taking an RB that early. I'm not opposed to a receiver either although I'm starting to grow on the idea of Harty at 15 if Demski isn't around. In my opinion, Lawrence is a luxury pick. But seen as how we have the luxury of three top 15 picks, I'd use one on him if the board fell that way.
  24. Mike
    We don't start a Canadian RB and there's no plans to do so for the Bombers, so I think you gotta go best WR before taking an RB at 11. Don't need to start a Canadian RB in my opinion - he essentially gives you the ability to do three things - have your thunder / lightning backfield combo without burning a designated import spot, if you so choose - have a competent backup as opposed to a Carl Volny type if you're going to go with one feature back - give you the ability to play a full complement of import receivers in certain sets (you could get Stoudermire in on offense, etc) On top of all of that, he has starting RB potential. You could land yourself a legitimate ratio buster.
  25. Mike
    Connor had more hits than any of the other LBs in the draft class. Led Can-West in tackles as a JR and SR. Made a lot of plays behind the line of scrimmage and defended against the pass well. Last year 9 LBs were selected and expect more of the same this year. I had Connor as my #7 LB before the Jay Langa positive test at the Combine. Out of curiosity, are Ackie and Omara in those previous 6? Or did you designate them DB/DL?
×
×
  • Create New...