Jump to content

Mike

Administrators
  • Posts

    9,491
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Mike

  1. Seriously? That's bottom of the barrel, man... why not bring back Hargs instead? Not every signing has to be one worth putting a front page headline on. They can't all be Baboulas. I know right? It's so inconsistent. In one thread, he's bemoaning our lack of participation in the heated Baboulas sweepstakes and in another, he's complaining that we might be interested in Mike Bradwell.
  2. I can't wait for our Willy to be throwing ropes all over the field at IGF.
  3. No, it's essentially a new contract but it's deemed an extension because technically, his existing contract was overwritten seen as how it didn't expire until Monday.
  4. Extend Willy? REALLY? Come on.
  5. Seriously? That's bottom of the barrel, man... why not bring back Hargs instead? Not every signing has to be one worth putting a front page headline on.
  6. Why wouldn't we see him? You think he will beat out January...? I would think January is pretty much a lock just due to his experience... I think if he's good enough, he will.
  7. Why wouldn't we see him?
  8. Hall really isn't that bad, he definitely appeals to me as a backup.
  9. I'm not really that high on him, I just think that if they're going to go 3 NI receivers, even if a guy like that is semi useful, you can put him at the boundary WR and put those rebounding skills to use.
  10. I know they want to bring Alli into camp. Could be Poblah 2.0 but could also be a starting NI receiver right out of the gate.
  11. Ya kno, it doesn't surprise me one ounce that you already think this without even getting out of the off-season.. Stay classy bud. Keep the faith!! Forget class, sell me on all the great things that have transpired this off season. Granted, he still has many months to make it happen, but so far are you honestly impressed? Or are you just being "positive?" Oy. Can we sell you on the fact that we avoided a giant albatross of a contract on Burris; and that Hamilton and Kent Austin were a flashier sell for Collaros instead? Way too early to be passing judgment on Walters. The mess that Mack left the organization in... pile on all that you want. But way too early to judge Walters. Fair response and I appreciate you indulging my question. Still, he could've easily over paid for Burris and just cut the guy next year. I am fine with Glenn, but Desjardins is going to anally pound us for him. And Lizard is going to have to take it. Which is a great idea if you're looking to solve one problem by creating another one. If that's how he thinks business is done, he'll quickly develop a reputation that is just as bad as the one we have now. We're trying to rebuild our image as an appealing football club to join up with. Signing guys only to cut them a year later for no reason other than money troubles is not how you establish that.
  12. I'm pretty much out of sources at this point lol I rarely get any information nowadays
  13. Quite honestly, I have no idea how you come to your conclusions regarding offensive linemen. I'd love to hear your expanded analysis on why a guy like Baboulas is a better OL than Sorenson.
  14. BS you can only subtract from your roster at this time of year... Esks lost Krausnick to Ottawa and then signed Baboulas just a few days ago to shore up their depth at Centre. Plus Dublanko as an ST addition. I'd certainly take Baboulas over Kowalczuk. Nothing wrong with taking a look at where we stand this year as opposed to this time last year... see where we stand with FA coming. Sorry, I stand corrected. You can make acquisitions of spare parts that were discarded by the rest of the league too.
  15. It's kind of a strange time to start a ratio discussion. This is literally the worst time of year to look at a roster. All you can do is subtract from your roster at this point, you can't add any new certainties to it until a week from now.
  16. The best way to get a player to return to your franchise after an NFL stint is to alienate them and make them feel as unwanted as possible on their way out.
  17. There's really no contradiction. Giving up a second round pick in a draft that isn't very deep doesn't mean he should just throw away the 2nd overall pick. The draft isn't deep, that doesn't mean there is ONE good player.
  18. That sounds like a real pain in the butt.
  19. Anyone saying the Burris deal could be a bargain when the cap goes up is forgetting that there's about a 99.9% chance he's got a stipulation in his deal that the value goes up if the cap goes up.
  20. I fully expect to win no more than 4 games in 2014.
  21. To be fair ... An agent expecting a client to get a NFL contract isn't exactly groundbreaking.
  22. Then Neiswander becomes available OH PHEW!
  23. That's a nice thought but there are three things here ... a) Ottawa seems to have no interest in getting Glenn We don't have Drew Willy signed c) Would Glenn really want to come here to work with Marcel Bellefeuille?
×
×
  • Create New...