I was commenting on the comparison that was made between Riel and Cornwallis. For the record, I don't think Riel should have executed Thomas Scott, it was one of the mistakes he made.
Unless your comment was addressing something else...
In collective bargaining language, the word is retroactive. It’s like getting back pay. Some clauses are retroactive to the day the previous agreement expired, others are effective date of signing, while still others are effective on a date agreed to by all parties.
A) The discussion went on longer than it needed to, but it was always clear that it was based on what we ‘fans’ can see on the field.
B. You don’t know much Nichols second guesses himself.
C) If the criteria is that we don’t know all the variables, then I guess we can’t say anything, good or bad.
Anyone who signs a one or two year contract right now. The bulk of that contract will be for the time period after the current CBA expires. They should still be able to get the benefits of the new CBA.
The current agreement does not expire until training camp 2019. So, there's no way the new agreement could have an impact on 2018.
Note: the previous collective agreement was ratified on June 13, 2014, several weeks after the previous one had expired.