Mark H.

A.K.A give them a majority and let do what they want. Lather, rinse, repeat.

You may want to look at how he played when they weren’t starting a fake MLB - a lot of what happened this year was not on Loffler.

Yep, that’s my Colony

If they go with 3 Canadians on the OL, which it looks like they will, they won't necessarily need a Canadian starting at LB

Buff knows a guy, who knows a guy...

There are guys out here who would make sure he actually catches fish - but methinks Miller has things sorted

It was indeed -superb

Yes, but all such conversations (including re Westerman) boiled down to 'it has to work for the team and for the player.' So - make of that what you will

Don't hold your oxygen...

Doesn’t a funding bill require 60% support?

That should work as long as Poop & Nevis are never on the field at the same time

Yes? Who's the Canadian DT that rotates with him - taking the majority of the reps?

I always said he had good receivers and threw a lot of balls up for grabs, that’s still true of him. It’s also been true of Mike Reilly this past season. That doesn’t make either of them a bad QB as a whole.

I think Trestman adjusting the play & scheme of his offensive lines to fit with how Calvlillo and Ray play was the key to success.

Best case scenario

This would be okay, maybe about average. I would prefer: O - Harris, Chungh, Goosen, young NI OL, Feoli Gudino/Coates D - Westerman/Corney, Loffler Rotate: Thomas, Ekakatie They do have the option of keeping Bond and rotating Thomas / Ekakatie as the 7th NI It comes down to which option they feel is more valuable

Yes - we know we can’t have nice things

Starters at the bottom? Can you clarify that?

First, I hope that's not an actual thing. The current secondary cannot be without Chris Randle, that much is certain. The current OL would take a step down without Travis Bond, no question. But would they take a nose dive? So, if this truly is a choice between Bond and Randle, then I truly don't know what to say. Bond is an outstanding guard, but the Bombers have been drafting OL heavily. So, if the team still has to debate between the Bond and Randle, we got problems. To answer your question concisely: DB > LG but LT > DB

It would stand to reason that the team is interested in doing that - just hope they don’t do it prematurely I stand by the statement I made two months ago: the OL should be sacrificed last, not first.

So much depends upon - what hasn’t happened since 1990.

It was epic, particularly one TC post after which he avoided reporters.

I was 14 years old in 1990 & that GC victory was when I first started seriously following our Big Blue. By the way, some of my ‘moments’ are longer. So here you have it - post 1990: 10. Khari Jones emerging as a legit QB (consider the pre-Jones offense) 9. The emergence of Doug Brown 8. A legit OL during the Berry era 7. Milt’s 4 TD game 6. Matt Dunigan - 713 5. Juran Bolden’s playoff pick 6 4. Chuck Diesel’s many grand performances and his infamous post 3. Milt Stegall - touchdown regal 2. A truly great team in 2001 1. The Milt Miracle

I say now...

And moving away from the communal model is viewed as progress. I can tell you that sustaining a communal culture in North America is an enormous challenge. Acculturation to the host society is a powerful magnet.