Mark H.

Eventually it will be possible and legal to get new relatives. For now, better hope for two wins.

They schemed to stop the run and the short passing game. 20 carries to gain 25 yards would have been the result.

It's really funny - when you insult people using run on sentences.

I know - sometimes I like to just keep talking.

6 blockers, 1 QB With a 3 or 4 man rush, that leaves 8 or 9 players to cover 5 receivers. On the Jorden TD, I’m pretty sure I counted 7 blockers.

They added extra protection in the second half. You can see it on every one of the Stamps’ TDs - 6 or 7 blockers. The Stamps made that adjustment which put the onus on the secondary to get it done in coverage.

There was nothing wrong with the pressure in the first half. But then Calgary schemed to add more protection, which put the onus on the secondary.

That’s true if they ignore the fourth quarter. Which exactly what will be said on air tomorrow.

There was safety help on the incomplete deep shot and double coverage on most others - but really, the only plays we could are the ones he was thrown to, so you could be right.

Oh, I think it would have been fantastic, I just don’t think you get to have your cake & eat it too when you fire someone.

Adams is open deep every game. If Nichols could hit him a couple of times, it would completely change the game. He’s open and the pass falls incomplete. Jorden is covered but scores a TD.

It sure doesn’t work that way in my profession.

Hey Joe, you’re fired, but leave the database in your office.

If you mean the pick 6, even you could’ve made that play

Our receivers are often a stationary target - it seems to be by design.

Outstanding grab by SK #1

They missed earlier opportunities and then had a forth quarter meltdown. The deep shot to Adams should have been a TD. Then Jorden scores a TD despite being surrounded by DBs.

🙄

Yes and yes.

Usually. If the QB saw blitz or cover zero in the pre-snap read, he could count on Milt to run a short post down the middle.

You have to do it before that happens - Milt would recognize the blitz and break off his route.

Second in the West seems to be there for the taking.

I don’t quite agree about the Esks D. Their offence had a lead at halftime mostly due to turnovers. Then they proceeded to not score any points at all during the second half. Their O showed up for one turnover aided quarter.

Seems you can make crucial mistakes and still beat the Esks.

#70 will miss.