Mark H.

Since we're going down that road: it's 'an H' at the end

I know how much people love this argument, but he was signed to a big contract and started five games this year - decisions made by professional "intelligent" football people

When Nicholls is an effective game manager, that is 100% correct. Also, all three teams have issues on D

Great to watch again - highly recommended!

I watched the game again this afternoon - same question...

I thought it was a fumble - we were lucky to have the call go our way on a very close play I really don't give a damn if that makes me a complainer The people in the command centre are human beings

SAM linebacker, kick returner, and you can put him at safety & heads will roll there - hell of a ball player

It would bode well for the Jays - get that rotation rested up

IMO, it's rather late already...

Just for the record - I'm going to weed some of these distracting posts out but I'm not going to bother splitting them off into a new thread.

I'll wager there were fewer kids raising their hands or coming to your desk

Plenty of teams have hung on to a vet QB because they thought he'd take them to one more championship. But That still doesn't prove that the Argos made a mistake with Willy.

Nope, just think it's better to let things play out and not assume we've got it all figured out.

Yes, I'm sure you're a better QB evaluator than Milanovich

1. We had guys likes Picard and Morley getting beat snap after snap 2. Reilly usually gets hit when he scrambles to extend plays. He has a very reckless playing style - that's not on his OL 3. Given what the Argos gave up to get him - they are clearly of the belief that Drew Willy can still be effective

In that particular instance, you're right

TBH I don't expect him to change anything. I expect next week to be 'more of the same and let's hope it works'

Partly. But I think his play-calling is predicated on minimizing turnovers. I think if he ran an Esks or Stamps scheme with the players we have, there would be more turnovers.

Agreed, except that you can't ignore the slow starts by the O and the lack of red zone production, which many raised during the streak.

This is the same team that had a 34 - 0 lead at the half and had Reilly looking lost out there... Listen to yourselves..,

Those are exactly the kind of plays that were going the Bombers' way during the winning streak.

This the same D that won 7 games in a row. They give up a ton of yards but they 'were' getting turnovers. It's time for the O to step up and be the reason why we win once in a while. It's like a good hockey team winning in spite of the goalie having an off-night

It's funny how long it was accepted that human life began in Africa and people spread from there - no other possibilities considered

Just like climate change and immunization

I predict we'll win by less than a TD. If they pressure / contain Reilly, turnovers will happen - this ain't the Stamps OL. Best make sure the D scheme isn't getting schooled for an entire half...