Jump to content

Mark H.

Moderators
  • Posts

    8,624
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    50

Reputation Activity

  1. Go Bombers
    Mark H. reacted to Bigblue204 in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    There is, but i love going to games.
  2. Haha
    Mark H. reacted to Noeller in 3 turds plus cranky honker don’t say roster management edition   
    I've known you for 25 years and that's the first I'm hearing of this......
  3. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from Piggy 1 in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    When Lapo posted all that stuff, breaking down the Bombers' D last season, that is not how Hall ran his D.
    Harris was also used a lot as a receiver, especially when Nichols was under centre.
  4. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from Noeller in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    Check down RB or receiver - 6 of one, half a dozen of the other 
    Anyway, here are their numbers for passing and running attempts.  (Wikipedia)
    Harris (2016-2021): 1194 / 5 = 239 / season
    Oliviera (2021 - 2024): 922 / 4 = 231 / season
    Their busiest seasons are actually quite similar. 
    Harris:
    2017: 294
    2019: 295
    Oliviera:
    2023: 298
    2024: 296
     
  5. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from rebusrankin in Random Jets News   
    D like Samberg are the bedrock of good teams.
  6. Thanks
    Mark H. got a reaction from rebusrankin in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    Check down RB or receiver - 6 of one, half a dozen of the other 
    Anyway, here are their numbers for passing and running attempts.  (Wikipedia)
    Harris (2016-2021): 1194 / 5 = 239 / season
    Oliviera (2021 - 2024): 922 / 4 = 231 / season
    Their busiest seasons are actually quite similar. 
    Harris:
    2017: 294
    2019: 295
    Oliviera:
    2023: 298
    2024: 296
     
  7. Agree
    Mark H. reacted to Mike in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    Someone needs to answer publicly for that, I think there needs to be an explanation given as to why we sunk 160k (lots upfront) into a receiver that we aren’t even considering using 
  8. Like
    Mark H. reacted to Tracker in Argos at Bombers early chat   
  9. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from Noeller in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    When Lapo posted all that stuff, breaking down the Bombers' D last season, that is not how Hall ran his D.
    Harris was also used a lot as a receiver, especially when Nichols was under centre.
  10. Like
    Mark H. reacted to Goalie in Random Jets News   
    Agreed.  5.75 seems right for a shutdown 2nd pairing d man. 
     
    solid deal. Shouldn’t be a problem in the future either as wife opened up a dental clinic in the peg. 
     
    When the cap is 100 million in a few years (maybe) (they are projecting but economy and stuff ) 5.75 and 7.25 is gonna be normal. Lowry prob won’t get much of a raise tho. Connor will. 
  11. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from Goalie in Random Jets News   
    D like Samberg are the bedrock of good teams.
  12. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from Noeller in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    No, the D has changed. Richie Hall's D relied a lot more on pressure. Younger's is more coverage based.
    The change is not as recent, but the O no longer runs primarily through the RB, both passing and running, the way it did when Andrew Harris was starting. 
  13. Thanks
    Mark H. got a reaction from Noeller in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    It can't be as clear cut as this either. Man, this is a very cynical take.
  14. Agree
    Mark H. reacted to blue85gold in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    I don’t hate the plan to ground and pound with Brady, Cooley and Strev 
  15. Sad
    Mark H. got a reaction from Piggy 1 in Argos at Bombers early chat   
    It can't be as clear cut as this either. Man, this is a very cynical take.
  16. Agree
    Mark H. reacted to Brandon in GDT- Bombers @ Toronto   
    Suitor always brought up how both lines would beat up the opposition and by the 4th quarter we wore them down and would be able to run it down their throats.
    He still brings this up yet this is no longer true.
     
  17. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from BigBlueFanatic in GDT- Bombers @ Toronto   
    You know it wasn't. 2019 and 2021, this was a damn hard team to play against. They physically beat other teams up. 
  18. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from Bigblue204 in GDT- Bombers @ Toronto   
    You know it wasn't. 2019 and 2021, this was a damn hard team to play against. They physically beat other teams up. 
  19. Thanks
    Mark H. got a reaction from Noeller in GDT- Bombers @ Toronto   
    You know it wasn't. 2019 and 2021, this was a damn hard team to play against. They physically beat other teams up. 
  20. Agree
    Mark H. got a reaction from TBURGESS in 3 turds play CH stink stank stunk 3 in a row   
    First, I'm not shitting on you.
    Some fans pay more attention to the team, that's just how it is. 
    But one thing is certain: if performances like those we saw this past Saturday keep happening, the casual fans will vote with their feet. It has happened before, it will happen again.
    I remember attending a game at the end of 2014. Attendance was poor, and everyone but the die hards was there for the beer. The game consisted of watching Henry Burris and Co. shred our secondary.
    There have been some major warning signs. I mean, losing a Grey Cup to Nick Arbuckle - that's quite glaring if you stop to think about it. 
  21. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from wbbfan in 3 turds play CH stink stank stunk 3 in a row   
    Speaking as a long term hard core fan, this is true. It's easier on the psyche to expect less during downward trends. Of course you also get occasional surprises, like 2019 and 2007.
  22. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from captaincanuck12 in 3 turds play CH stink stank stunk 3 in a row   
    Speaking as a long term hard core fan, this is true. It's easier on the psyche to expect less during downward trends. Of course you also get occasional surprises, like 2019 and 2007.
  23. Agree
    Mark H. got a reaction from rebusrankin in 3 turds play CH stink stank stunk 3 in a row   
    First, I'm not shitting on you.
    Some fans pay more attention to the team, that's just how it is. 
    But one thing is certain: if performances like those we saw this past Saturday keep happening, the casual fans will vote with their feet. It has happened before, it will happen again.
    I remember attending a game at the end of 2014. Attendance was poor, and everyone but the die hards was there for the beer. The game consisted of watching Henry Burris and Co. shred our secondary.
    There have been some major warning signs. I mean, losing a Grey Cup to Nick Arbuckle - that's quite glaring if you stop to think about it. 
  24. Like
    Mark H. got a reaction from Bigblue204 in 3 turds play CH stink stank stunk 3 in a row   
    Speaking as a long term hard core fan, this is true. It's easier on the psyche to expect less during downward trends. Of course you also get occasional surprises, like 2019 and 2007.
  25. Agree
    Mark H. reacted to wbbfan in 3 turds play CH stink stank stunk 3 in a row   
    I think most casual and semi casual fans would rather their team be bad than mediocre. In the nba the teams in the worst spot, are the ones in the middle of the none play off pack. Most people perceive the come back from bad, to be easier and shorter than from mediocre. 
     IMO, in football, if you don’t have the franchise qb, you’re in the same boat as the rest who don’t. And you don’t need a tank or tear down year to turn it around. Calgary this year and Toronto proved that. 
     I don’t think posters on here want us to lose, I do think a lot of people have low expectations. Until we make better decisions, mine are low. 
×
×
  • Create New...