Mark H.

He said on the postgame that "he thought it was PI."

Ok...you guys were expecting to be impressed? Lol.

Gotta give Thomas some credit for a couple of plays today... chased down Dru Brown and stayed with him on his cut back, and then knocked down a pass on the next drive.

See?! I totally forgot about THAT stupidity!

I expected to lose tbh, consider me pleasantly surprised

i am pleasantly surprised that we won, played an entertaining competitive game, but damn  still some crazy decisions 
he is 

Ok...you guys were expecting to be impressed? Lol.

Ok...you guys were expecting to be impressed? Lol.

Just gonna gloss over the stupidity and ineptitude another week....win is a bonus but man ....we need better

He did, saving a complete melt down on MBB

ZC sez "screw this, we're winning."

ZC sez "screw this, we're winning."

You may wish to consider that "evolving"  is a process that took millions of years.

We were making the same comments about Buck Pierce and his adjustments last year (other than when we felt he had moments of brilliance).
Perhaps it's time to acknowledge that it's more talent than scheme
When you take a hard look at the offense we used to have, the only one who has been effectively replaced, is Andrew Harris
The OL is good when they can start Bryant and 2 other Americans, but it is still a shadow of its former self
On D same thing. Younger's scheme was lauded last year, this year it is not working as well.
With the way the league / refs are letting offensive lines hold, I think it's essential to have a good secondary
Until that gets sorted, nothing else the D does will matter. 

I predict: The Bombers will play their most complete 3 quarters of the year, Collaros will be consistent but not remarkable. The game will be out of reach at the start of the 4th and the Bombers will let their foot off the gas. They will still win convincingly but Brown will put up super gaudy numbers which will fuel the Brown vs Collaros debate for weeks to come. 

Moved from the main CFL football forum
I think this discussion will be better done here.

Moved "leather footballs" into General Discussion.
 

Last week was a 1 point loss, to IMO the best team in the west.

Last week was a 1 point loss, to IMO the best team in the west.

Last week was a 1 point loss, to IMO the best team in the west.

Last week was a 1 point loss, to IMO the best team in the west.

Last week was a 1 point loss, to IMO the best team in the west.

Tim White

I don’t think it’s fair to "write off and move on” from *any* of our quarterbacks given the state of our offensive line. Receivers. Coaching and co-ordinating are all holding this group back.  That said, Zach at 600K is absurd.  His play, over multiple seasons, doesn’t warrant it.  Strev hasn’t played well but if you set aside your bias and ask yourself: does a system that asks a QB (who has just come off a serious knee injury) to block for his running back put that player in the best position to be successful?  No QB has a chance.
Nobody on our offensive line is untouchable.  Stan stays (if he wants to) to play, provide mentorship and a veteran voice. There are guys who have potential (Wallace) but need to be pushed and replaced (if necessary).
WRs.  Talent.  Plain and simple.  We need players who run well, can push veterans and can create space for themselves in the routes they run - that's what we need.  NI.  Import.  Doesn’t matter. 
Corners specifically need an upgrade.  Holm and Nichols are fine but also need serious challengers facing them.  Safety is a work in progress and we *may* have a guy on our roster who can play back there but we actually need to give that guy reps and see him work.

Oh...how have the mighty fallen...