Mark H.

I like Dave Naylor on the panel.  Can’t disagree with the panel’s assessment of the Bombers’ recent play, even with the shallow analysis.
Discussing the Bombers lack of physicality while the camera panned on a smiling Osh did sting a bit.

And the rain this past Sunday was spot on.

Without the smoke, we would've had a heat wave this week. 

And the rain this past Sunday was spot on.

Given his existing skill set at the time, his OC should have 100% tailored the game plan for him. We have seen results of that here.

I will admit that I thought the focus on O had shifted more to the passing game. I remember guys like Darvin Adams, Rasheed Bailey and Drew Wolitarski, doing tons of effective blocking downfield as receivers. I feel we are seeing less of that, but the numbers show that RB touches have not changed much. I actually find that to be quite odd.
I would say ZC goes deep more, while MN would throw more check downs - good thing he had a reliable RB and receivers willing to block.
As for Hogan being watered down Lapo, I think you're right and I find it confusing. Why would an experienced HC and veteran QB settle for mediocrity?

Whoa, I would never have guessed that ZC8 is completing almost 70%. If he  could avoid other jerseys more often, he might get something going. 

And the rain this past Sunday was spot on.

Rich is on a canoeing trip this week, but I'm sure he'll honour your requested changes retroactively.

Southern Ontario was brutally hot this week. Glad to be home but this smoke…
After travelling to TO for that debacle last week we just decided that we need a for sure “Go” by about that time or we’re not driving the hour + to the game tonight. 

Without the smoke, we would've had a heat wave this week. 

Without the smoke, we would've had a heat wave this week. 

Given his existing skill set at the time, his OC should have 100% tailored the game plan for him. We have seen results of that here.

Given his existing skill set at the time, his OC should have 100% tailored the game plan for him. We have seen results of that here.

I will admit that I thought the focus on O had shifted more to the passing game. I remember guys like Darvin Adams, Rasheed Bailey and Drew Wolitarski, doing tons of effective blocking downfield as receivers. I feel we are seeing less of that, but the numbers show that RB touches have not changed much. I actually find that to be quite odd.
I would say ZC goes deep more, while MN would throw more check downs - good thing he had a reliable RB and receivers willing to block.
As for Hogan being watered down Lapo, I think you're right and I find it confusing. Why would an experienced HC and veteran QB settle for mediocrity?

Whoa, I would never have guessed that ZC8 is completing almost 70%. If he  could avoid other jerseys more often, he might get something going. 

Rich is on a canoeing trip this week, but I'm sure he'll honour your requested changes retroactively.

There is, but i love going to games.

I've known you for 25 years and that's the first I'm hearing of this......

When Lapo posted all that stuff, breaking down the Bombers' D last season, that is not how Hall ran his D.
Harris was also used a lot as a receiver, especially when Nichols was under centre.

Check down RB or receiver - 6 of one, half a dozen of the other 
Anyway, here are their numbers for passing and running attempts.  (Wikipedia)
Harris (2016-2021): 1194 / 5 = 239 / season
Oliviera (2021 - 2024): 922 / 4 = 231 / season
Their busiest seasons are actually quite similar. 
Harris:
2017: 294
2019: 295
Oliviera:
2023: 298
2024: 296
 

D like Samberg are the bedrock of good teams.

Check down RB or receiver - 6 of one, half a dozen of the other 
Anyway, here are their numbers for passing and running attempts.  (Wikipedia)
Harris (2016-2021): 1194 / 5 = 239 / season
Oliviera (2021 - 2024): 922 / 4 = 231 / season
Their busiest seasons are actually quite similar. 
Harris:
2017: 294
2019: 295
Oliviera:
2023: 298
2024: 296
 

Someone needs to answer publicly for that, I think there needs to be an explanation given as to why we sunk 160k (lots upfront) into a receiver that we aren’t even considering using