Mark H.

Said more about WPG at the time than HAM, in retrospect.

Quick breakdown of who has the advantage at various positions, in my opinion:
QB: Calgary (no doubt)
RB: Winnipeg (best in the league)
OL: Winnipeg (best front 5 in the CFL, not even debatable)
Receivers: Winnipeg (Calgary injuries and recent strong play from our group)
DL: Calgary (This is 1a vs. 1b)
LB: Calgary (JSK out, so no doubt here)
DB: Push (excellent play from our group recently)
Return Game: Calgary (we don't shine here)
Kick Coverage: Winnipeg (but need to get back to their usual competence)
Kickers: Push
Overall: 
The Defense will keep on doing what they do.  Hope to see some pressure from rushing 3 or 4.
Nichols needs to run a respectable passing attack, so the Stamps can't key on the run.  Lapo needs to NOT randomly and inexplicably abandon the run.
The OL will keep on beating people up.
 

Fair comments.  Coverage has been good all year - they need to get back to that. 

Quick breakdown of who has the advantage at various positions, in my opinion:
QB: Calgary (no doubt)
RB: Winnipeg (best in the league)
OL: Winnipeg (best front 5 in the CFL, not even debatable)
Receivers: Winnipeg (Calgary injuries and recent strong play from our group)
DL: Calgary (This is 1a vs. 1b)
LB: Calgary (JSK out, so no doubt here)
DB: Push (excellent play from our group recently)
Return Game: Calgary (we don't shine here)
Kick Coverage: Winnipeg (but need to get back to their usual competence)
Kickers: Push
Overall: 
The Defense will keep on doing what they do.  Hope to see some pressure from rushing 3 or 4.
Nichols needs to run a respectable passing attack, so the Stamps can't key on the run.  Lapo needs to NOT randomly and inexplicably abandon the run.
The OL will keep on beating people up.
 

Welcome.... to the 'On Sale' rack!

Wow, that must have quite a kick!
 

Quick breakdown of who has the advantage at various positions, in my opinion:
QB: Calgary (no doubt)
RB: Winnipeg (best in the league)
OL: Winnipeg (best front 5 in the CFL, not even debatable)
Receivers: Winnipeg (Calgary injuries and recent strong play from our group)
DL: Calgary (This is 1a vs. 1b)
LB: Calgary (JSK out, so no doubt here)
DB: Push (excellent play from our group recently)
Return Game: Calgary (we don't shine here)
Kick Coverage: Winnipeg (but need to get back to their usual competence)
Kickers: Push
Overall: 
The Defense will keep on doing what they do.  Hope to see some pressure from rushing 3 or 4.
Nichols needs to run a respectable passing attack, so the Stamps can't key on the run.  Lapo needs to NOT randomly and inexplicably abandon the run.
The OL will keep on beating people up.
 

Quick breakdown of who has the advantage at various positions, in my opinion:
QB: Calgary (no doubt)
RB: Winnipeg (best in the league)
OL: Winnipeg (best front 5 in the CFL, not even debatable)
Receivers: Winnipeg (Calgary injuries and recent strong play from our group)
DL: Calgary (This is 1a vs. 1b)
LB: Calgary (JSK out, so no doubt here)
DB: Push (excellent play from our group recently)
Return Game: Calgary (we don't shine here)
Kick Coverage: Winnipeg (but need to get back to their usual competence)
Kickers: Push
Overall: 
The Defense will keep on doing what they do.  Hope to see some pressure from rushing 3 or 4.
Nichols needs to run a respectable passing attack, so the Stamps can't key on the run.  Lapo needs to NOT randomly and inexplicably abandon the run.
The OL will keep on beating people up.
 

Our O line will have their hands full with that front. I can't wait for game time. GO BLUE!!

There seems to be a certain determination on the part of both the Bombers and the Stamps this year.  I think whoever wins tomorrow takes the cup on Nov. 25. 
It's cold, we have the advantage in the trenches, especially our OL, and we have the best Running Back - I like our chances.
I just hope the coaches aren't thinking about leaving some plays in the bag for next week - they should throw everything at the Stamps tomorrow. 

Definitely more of a sitting 🦆 for a DL that was already dominating. 

Definitely more of a sitting 🦆 for a DL that was already dominating. 

Definitely more of a sitting 🦆 for a DL that was already dominating. 

We did it again, boys. If we need more wool to pull over their eyes, there are plenty more sheep to shear. 

We did it again, boys. If we need more wool to pull over their eyes, there are plenty more sheep to shear. 

We did it again, boys. If we need more wool to pull over their eyes, there are plenty more sheep to shear. 

We did it again, boys. If we need more wool to pull over their eyes, there are plenty more sheep to shear. 

Media driven drama.
All,this from a league who can't get pass interference right.

I saw them as matadors. As the bulls rushed past, they simply side-stepped them. Ole! 

Don't forget the style points..... like looking around at each other, as opposing pass rushers breezed by, with stunned looks on their faces....

I think I should be hired as a ninth ref, with my only job being to stare at the cheerleaders...

Do. Not. Google.
What has been seen.... can not be unseen.

02 or 03. Blink is banged up so mike sellers take most of the carries. last drive of the game running down the clock and he just trucks through the entire RR D for 6 or 7 carries. Pushes the pile, loses his helmet and keeps on trucking. 

I appreciate a clean toilet myself.
 

I've never had an issue with him...if you were to look back on all the threads dumping on him I was one of the few supporters..he just ain't no every down tackle...he's a top notch guard tho..