-
Posts
7,728 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
41
Reputation Activity
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Fred C Dobbs in Garrett Waggoner
And those players are the key to good special teams play. Bringing in as many as you can is just a bloody good idea.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from SPuDS in Garrett Waggoner
And those players are the key to good special teams play. Bringing in as many as you can is just a bloody good idea.
-
-
Mark H. got a reaction from kelownabomberfan in Election 2015
The Cons will win again, for the same reason the Libs won all those majorities in the 90's.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from BattleLevel in So much for the theory...
I'm encouraged by the second half adjustments of Richie Hall and Co.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Blue-urns in So much for the theory...
I'm encouraged by the second half adjustments of Richie Hall and Co.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from BomberBall in So much for the theory...
I'm encouraged by the second half adjustments of Richie Hall and Co.
-
Mark H. reacted to HardCoreBlue in So much for the theory...
Yes, however what gives me hope is last night's game showed we do indeed have the ability to defend that pressure with hitches, screens, quick hits, counters etc
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Noeller in So much for the theory...
I'm encouraged by the second half adjustments of Richie Hall and Co.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Jaxon in The Winnipeg old boys club.
And if someone you hired was your 5th choice, where's the cronyism?
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Logan007 in Charleston Shooting
Self inflicted long term death - just another first world problem.
-
Mark H. reacted to TBURGESS in Other Games Thread Ott/Cal BC/TO Sask/Ham
Two great games last night.
Calgary made the mistakes we did last week and got the loss because of it. Shows what they look like when they can't just run Cornish in the second half. Still Ottawa tried to lose it by missing a convert then a 32 yard FG in the last couple of minutes. Should we be worried that Ottawa beat Calgary when we couldn't?
BC rolled out to an easy 21 point lead, thought they had the game in the bag and took their foot off the gas. What was Tedford thinking going for 3rd and 3+? Kick the ball and pin them deep. Turned the game around for Toronto. Why did BC stop going to Harris? He had a hat trick of TD's before a minute was gone in the 2nd quarter. If/When Lulay gets his deep ball range right, BC will be a force to be reckoned with.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Mark F in Other Games Thread Ott/Cal BC/TO Sask/Ham
Best game I've watched all year.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from CodyT in Other Games Thread Ott/Cal BC/TO Sask/Ham
Nice throw by Burris. If Williams has to hesitate at all he probably gets angled out. That was a howitzer right on the money.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from The Unknown Poster in U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide
Whatever the root causes may be, the very high suicide rate amongst transgendered people should be cause for concern. I believe we will someday have to answer for the way we treated other human beings. If my actions cause someone to commit suicide, I will have to answer for it.
-
Mark H. reacted to Logan007 in Bombers give Stamps a gift..
It's funny how some of you never post except when we lose then it's a full on bash about what is wrong.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from SPuDS in The Daily Early Game Day Thread - WPG @ CAL
I would hope we get consistent pressure without the blitz.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Noeller in The Daily Early Game Day Thread - WPG @ CAL
I would hope we get consistent pressure without the blitz.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from shadybob in The Daily Early Game Day Thread - WPG @ CAL
I would hope we get consistent pressure without the blitz.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Logan007 in U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide
The bolded part: I used to believe that, but I'm not so sure any more. I've already given my reasons for that.
Same sex marriage aside, the real concern should be the decrease of monogamous relationships in today's society. #1 it isn't safe, #2 is doesn't build strong families.
You can poke fun at this very old book as much you like, but the fact is its got some pretty good advice on things like adultery and faithfulness.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from basslicker in U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide
The bolded part: I used to believe that, but I'm not so sure any more. I've already given my reasons for that.
Same sex marriage aside, the real concern should be the decrease of monogamous relationships in today's society. #1 it isn't safe, #2 is doesn't build strong families.
You can poke fun at this very old book as much you like, but the fact is its got some pretty good advice on things like adultery and faithfulness.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from basslicker in U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide
Well, I find things like public nudity immoral. With all due respect to anyone who believes otherwise, I feel that it's my right to believe that.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from kelownabomberfan in U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide
Well, I find things like public nudity immoral. With all due respect to anyone who believes otherwise, I feel that it's my right to believe that.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from Logan007 in U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide
I'm quite willing to live and let live, but I've also been told to park my religious beliefs at the door. I had not said or done anything harmful or hateful. Tolerance is a two way street.
-
Mark H. got a reaction from basslicker in U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of same-sex marriage nationwide
I'm quite willing to live and let live, but I've also been told to park my religious beliefs at the door. I had not said or done anything harmful or hateful. Tolerance is a two way street.