Mark H.

You may want to look at how he played when they weren’t starting a fake MLB - a lot of what happened this year was not on Loffler. 

You may want to look at how he played when they weren’t starting a fake MLB - a lot of what happened this year was not on Loffler. 

If they go with 3 Canadians on the OL, which it looks like they will, they won't necessarily need a Canadian starting at LB
 

Yep, that’s my Colony 

Really got the impression from that cjob show that we'll see all IMP LB's this year... 

There are guys out here who would make sure he actually catches fish - but methinks Miller has things sorted

Yes, but all such conversations (including re Westerman) boiled down to 'it has to work for the team and for the player.'
So - make of that what you will

There are guys out here who would make sure he actually catches fish - but methinks Miller has things sorted

I don't think I care for your tone... 

It was indeed -superb

Don't hold your oxygen...

Why not? It was a polite inquiry with the sole motive of exploring the truth of the topic at hand. 

Yes, it does. But the image was posted simply to highlight the historic aspect as well as Trump's Twitter history coming back to bite him in the backside.
Anyway, the lights are back on in DC: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/shutdown-talks-us-senate-monday-1.4498038

Do we even know if he is making bigger bucks?
I highly doubt it and it prob has a clause in it for any starts he may get due to injury...nichols failing etc...good move to pick him up regardless.
If it means Davis has to go..so be it..the trade off of Durant and rookie 3rd string would be less than we woulda payed for Davis and Lefevour. 
We now have a guy who is familiar with coordinator.. an important receiver in Dressler and a guy who is a proven qb who can win and has seen all the defensive looks a qb will see in a game and will give us best chance to win games.
I going to like to see Durant on the short yardage plays stay in in cheetah like Lefevour..but actually make the next play and have ability to stay on field for several plays and run our offence against a jumbo set who cant get off the field..

I always said he had good receivers and threw a lot of balls up for grabs, that’s still true of him. It’s also been true of Mike Reilly this past season. That doesn’t make either of them a bad QB as a whole. 

Yes?  Who's the Canadian DT that rotates with him - taking the majority of the reps? 

I think Trestman adjusting the play & scheme of his offensive lines to fit with how Calvlillo and Ray play was the key to success. 

This would be okay, maybe about average.  I would prefer:
O - Harris, Chungh, Goosen, young NI OL, Feoli Gudino/Coates
D - Westerman/Corney, Loffler
Rotate: Thomas, Ekakatie
They do have the option of keeping Bond and rotating Thomas / Ekakatie as the 7th NI
It comes down to which option they feel is more valuable

I think Trestman adjusting the play & scheme of his offensive lines to fit with how Calvlillo and Ray play was the key to success. 

I think Trestman adjusting the play & scheme of his offensive lines to fit with how Calvlillo and Ray play was the key to success. 

I think Trestman adjusting the play & scheme of his offensive lines to fit with how Calvlillo and Ray play was the key to success. 

Yes - we know we can’t have nice things 

It would stand to reason that the team is interested in doing that - just hope they don’t do it prematurely 
I stand by the statement I made two months ago: the OL should be sacrificed last, not first.

It would stand to reason that the team is interested in doing that - just hope they don’t do it prematurely 
I stand by the statement I made two months ago: the OL should be sacrificed last, not first.

First, I hope that's not an actual thing. 
The current secondary cannot be without Chris Randle, that much is certain.
The current OL would take a step down without Travis Bond, no question.  But would they take a nose dive?
So, if this truly is a choice between Bond and Randle, then I truly don't know what to say.   Bond is an outstanding guard, but the Bombers have been drafting OL heavily.  So, if the team still has to debate between the Bond and Randle, we got problems.
To answer your question concisely:
DB > LG
but 
LT > DB