Jump to content

TBURGESS

Members
  • Posts

    5,348
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by TBURGESS

  1. Yes, the NFL and the premier league for that matter, makes and spends a ton of money. More than the CFL could ever hope for. That in itself doesn't make the NFL a bad comparison. Lets not pretend that any league that doesn't play football is a better comparison. The NFL had a season. They spent what was needed to 'protect' their players. The CFL can't afford to do that. They need the players and the fans to be vaccinated and the vaccination needs to work on multiple versions of Covid. I read that every team in the CFL lost $1 Million+ last year by not having a season. They chose that route rather than having a season and losing even more money per team. Another $1 Million loss per team would likely kill the league as the owners will shut them down instead of taking more losses. Owners need the probability of making money or at least breaking even to continue in the business. The Bell bailout was a stupid use of government money IMO. Bailing out other companies without strings attached would be equally stupid. Hopefully they have learned their lesson because they are making Air Canada pay people back for the flights that were cancelled. There was no federal money for a Winnipeg bubble. Don't expect there to be much, if any, to save our league.
  2. The CFL's size isn't a plus or a minus. The TV money pays for the players salaries. The NFL played last year, so it's not a 'it can't be done excuse'. The NFL is THE comparison. Covid is the biggest problem with money as a close second. The CFL doesn't have the money or the top end management teams that NFL or the Premier leagues have. The CFL dropped the ball by going to the government, hat in hand, asking for money without a justifying the amount or having the players on board. It wasn't surprising that they were turned down. The first and second rounds of government money have been given out, which makes it much harder to get federal money now. I doubt that the liberals care much about saving the CFL, so they are going to have to save themselves IMO. On the good news front, Alberta says that everyone who wants a vaccine will be able to get one by the end of June. With the 45 days between vaccinations, that means mid-August should see most people ready to get back to the stadiums in Alberta. If the non-vaccinated folks choose to go to games and get sick, it's on them.
  3. No, but they are the best comparison. Pro football to pro football.
  4. Wrong! I ignored fanboy on Feb 10. I actually I gave him a HaHa. It should have been over then.
  5. It sure is, but flexyboy started it back up again.
  6. So you're admitting we weren't a dominate team. Congrats! That's the first step.
  7. Ambrosie doesn't want to talk about the 2021 season. There is no downside to publicizing the plan, assuming there is one. There is a downside to not publicizing the plan IE: If you don't tell people what is going to happen, they will make up their own stories and those stories are likely to be worse than the real story. We aren't the only ones talking about it. Pedersen says: If he's right, the schedule we have isn't going to happen.
  8. They don't even need a best case scenario plan, just a worst case. Plan for the worst and hope for the best.
  9. Gotta say this doesn't shock me because they didn't let anyone know what the plan was for this year. Sucks for everyone if they can't get a season in, but the pandemic takes precedence over everything. Canada can't have 4 super spreader events a week. Maybe rapid testing at the door is an answer. Maybe only people who have been vaccinated (Vaccination cards?). Maybe 25% occupancy and masks for social distancing. Maybe all of the above.
  10. Grey Cup champs, but not a dominant team during the regular season.... Now lock it.
  11. You obviously don't understand what dominant means. We didn't dominate Regina. They were one or two plays away from beating us at the end of the game. They also shot themselves in the foot by putting their backup QB in to try to get a TD and failed horribly. Those plays was their mistakes, not our dominance. I'll give you Calgary and Hamilton in the playoffs, but we weren't a dominant team in the '19 regular season. We were average. I never said we lucked into anything. There's a ton of room between dominant and lucked in.
  12. One game doesn't make you a dominant team overall. It means you were dominant on the day.
  13. Dominant teams don't come in 3rd. They get a home game and win in front of their own fans. If we were weak at QB, then we weren't dominant. IMO the one dominant team in '19 was Hamilton and we dominated them in the GC.
  14. I'd think that Hamilton will be favorites this year. Their QB situation is the best in the league by far. We weren't a dominant team in '19. We had a great playoff season to win us the cup. Much like the way Calgary beat us all those years ago when they came from 3rd in the West.
  15. I'm a noted negatron who desperately wants to see the CFL this year.
  16. I wasn't happy with any of them when they were hired. Gotta say I was wrong about Miller and Walters. Still think that MOS is an average HC.
  17. Even Toronto disses Nichols. Haven't they looked at his stats that one year when he looked competent? Queue Less Nessman... Oh the humanity!
  18. We got a box of tape instead of nothing for Speller. It's a nothing trade IMO.
  19. Maybe 5 years ago, but going forward? Yikes!
  20. Adams, Faj-JJ, Nichols.
  21. The 2017 to 2019 comparison is cherry picking Nichols best year to Faj-JJ's 4th year in the league, first year as a starter. I don't think Faj-JJ is worth anywhere near $500K, but he's a young starter on his way up, not a beat up old QB who can't stay healthy. Lets see how he does next year before we call him a one or two trick pony.
  22. Nah! I'm living rent free in your head and have been for years.
  23. Not true, based on the comment you just made.
  24. That and the deep rail shots that Collaros completed at a high rate while Nichols' just missed' most of the time.
  25. We had the choice of signing Nichols or Collaros and chose Collaros despite the obvious injury issues. Why? Because the offense looked way better being run by Collaros. Quite frankly, Streveler would have won most of the games that Nichols won in the last 2 years and Streveler's not even a true starting QB yet. As I always point out wins are not a QB only stat.
×
×
  • Create New...