kelownabomberfan

That sounds like something a white nationalist would say.

I don't know what this means, but if I'm a white nationalist, then you are a white nationalist. I am not a "Trump-ite", but it shouldn't be me demanding the truth from the Alt-left. It should be you, and everyone else that has unwisely chosen to believe the flow of BS that feeds it. Why aren't you demanding the truth?

yes, it has a lot actually. That's your opinion though, and it doesn't mean very much. I used to think that you were a smart guy, but to see you being pulled down into the Big Brother alt-left abyss has been somewhat terrifying. And very disappointing. LOL - call me a troll, say I am posting demeaning alt-right stuff, then cry about having shots taken at you. This is propaganda 101 - accuse the other side of a transgression that you've already committed. I'm not offended. I just don't understand why a guy like Stephen Colbert would turn into a giant marshmellow when confronted with blatant lies. I get why someone like Trevor Noah would though. no, I'm was just offering a different opinion when someone posted that she was "awesome". She's not "awesome" at all. It's just truth. Dismissing truth as "alt-right" is just a cop-out to avoid critical thinking. LOL - this is just so pathetic. She's an easy target because she makes herself an easy target. Wandering around on the Hill looking for Mitch McConnell - just ridiculous. Continuing to bring identity politics into this discussion just shows that you've lost the argument. I don't know what crimes he's committed, but I don't need to talk about the outrage against him. You and your gang here have that covered. Yes, they are. They blindly support her, and that just MAGA. You say something this disgusting about me, and you want to claim that I am the one demeaning poeple? Dude, you have a serious problem. And you are getting way out of line. Stop with the insults. It's beneath you. No, what's gross is calling people white nationalists. You don't know me at all. You don't even know what nationality I am, or where I came from. You totally crossed the line, and for that I feel shame for you. Extreme shame.

Pot, meet kettle. I knew this was coming though. First fear (Oh no, someone is saying stuff I don't like), then the anger and the insults, and now the T word. I've been waiting for Nazi, white supremacist etc. It's easy to just resort to name-calling when you have nothing else. Calling out AOC (which started this whole thing) isn't trolling. It's just point out a different point of view. AOC has said a lot of really stupid stuff. That's just the truth. And even the WaPo has called her out on it. You can acknowledge that, or go MAGA and bury your head in the sand. That's not trolling. and I'm not surprised to see people so personally offended at political remarks about the alt left. It's really just the same old same old. And AOC, or whoever is controlling her, is using this trick perfectly. If you are talking about AOC, I don't see color. But her views are definitely scary, for the Democrats. Not sure what this is about or why you are asking me. I don't care about the super-rich paying more taxes. I do care when people deliberately falsely portray AOC as being perfect. She's not. She lies and totally makes a fool of herself constantly. Why can't this be pointed out? What is so scary about that? No, what we've seen are a few posters here get so obnoxious, and fill their posts with F-bombs, that cause the mods to lock the thread. This is when they are losing the argument, last resort tactic. LOL - all I want is the truth. And unfortunately, it appears certain posters here can't handle the truth. Because you don't want me to disrupt this echo-chamber you've got going?

It's not that hard to understand. Those complaining about the term "Orwellian" don't really understand what the term means. The blatant ignorance displayed in that Tweet is pretty jaw-dropping. She is advocating for the government to determine and enforce "acceptable" speech. That's "Orwellian". Even some of those jumping on me in the past two days have to have some shred of appreciation for free speech. Yet this person doesn't get it. At all. And that's the problem. When you just believe everything you are fed and told how to think, you immediately dismiss all information that doesn't conform to your bias. So, that leads you to say "I'm don't want to be called Orwellian, but I do want Big Brother to tell me what to do". Total obliviousness.

LOL This is just in the last few days. And you are saying that I am the one posting "demeaning, attacking, ridiculing stuff? This is just such blatant hypocrisy. As I said I get it, you're scared. It's scary when people challenge the stuff you've been fed from the Alt-left. It's challenging your beliefs. If you think AOC is awesome, that's great. I think that she's a liar, who doesn't really know what she is talking about. It's sad when people like Stephen Colbert sell out, just to try and make someone look good, who doesn't deserve it. But such is the world we live in. Here's a good video. The guy isn't "Alt-right". He just wanted to ask AOC some questions. AOC was nice enough to answer them. She actually seems like a nice person. So why is there so much control around her? What and who is grooming her?

can you tell me what everyone is so scared of? I don't get it. Any contrary opinion is immediately dismissed as "alt-right". Why is no one allowed a different opinion without immediately being labeled, and all information provided is just dismissed as "crap" and "garbage" because someone else told you it was. How is this not Orwellian?

and those AOC videos were funny, because they were true. AOC says the dumbest things, that are actually funny. "Everyone has two jobs" - LOL - the entertainment value of what comes out of her mouth is actually just that - entertainment. Another parallel to Trump.

oh, I am seeing a lot of moronic replies here, that's for sure, and now of course as you are feeling scared that someone (GASP!!) is pointing out all of the holes in your confirmation bias, you are getting angry, and now are resulting to insults. I get it, it's scary when you have to question what you've been told is truth. But it's worth it. Call me "Maralargo Bomber fan" all you want, but we both have brains, and I know you will use yours, and really start to think about all of the BS you've been fed. And it's never too late.

But you don't.. You go too whatever site tells you what you are allowed to read, and then Big Brother tells you that you can't read what they are saying. Because GASP!! it might not agree with the confirmation bias that has been built. You don't "fact-check", you look for any reason whatsoever to avoid reading anything that you disagree with. It's really sad. There is a real pattern here though - discredit any website that might disagree with whatever the accepted left "beliefs" are, and then use that fake discredit to just ignore what they are saying. This is the perfect way to stay uninformed, and to remain inside an echo-chamber of your own design.

Why do you believe that it exists? Have you seen it?

LOL - "this doesn't agree with everything I've been told to believe" so therefore it is "garbage". Just sad.

100% agree. And this is why news sources that immediately jumped on the Jussie Smollett fraud need to be questioned. What is causing these news sources to jump on these lies so fast. Is it because of their confirmation bias? I say yes. First of all, you demonstrated that you hadn't even looked at it, so how do you know it's "Crap". It appears that the only real metric that things are "crap" is based on what conflicts with your inherent bias. If it makes you question the "crap" that you've chosen to believe as truth, then it must be shunned. This whole "horrendous sources" thing is just so lame, and so sad. It's just a cowardly excuse to ignore a different point of view. To avoid having to think about anything that you've chose to believe as truth being questioned. And that's just sad.

Is there anything that you guys are actually allowed to read? Or is this just the "go-to" every time someone writes something that you don't want to hear? Immediately check the alt-left rating and then hold your hands over your ears?? So cowardly. So what was in that article that was "borderline questionable" exactly? Are you saying that the attack wasn't staged? That the media wasn't fooled? That they haven't been fooled hundreds of times? Is there anything in that article that you think is incorrect? Because this constant 1984'ing of all items that you disagree with is just really really sad.

I'm not sure why our Justice Minister is also our Attorney General. I am against increased government spending as a rule, but in this case I think that the job should be separated, to avoid these kinds of conflicts of interest.

Liberals defeat motion for inquiry. Of course. https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-story-249764-4-.htm#249764

This is just sad: If there was a "national outrage" over the dubious incident, it was limited to gullible left-wing journalists, celebrities, politicians, and activists. The "narrative" only seemed "cut-and-dry" to people who were looking at the case through lenses clouded by their anti-Trump bias. It seemed made up to those of us who noticed that Smollett's allegations were outlandish, implausible, and riddled with inconsistencies from the get-go. Yet even as his story started falling apart (which happened almost immediately), the national media clung to their precious narrative. There's been much commentary in the past few days about the MSM's lack of critical thinking skills in covering not only the Jussie Smollett "hate crime" fairy tale, but a number of other bogus stories as well. Over the years, the MSM has fallen for hundreds of hate crime hoaxes, reporting on them as if they were confirmed facts, rather than mere allegations. By the time the story is proven to be a hoax, the media has already moved on to the next manufactured outrage. This phenomenon has only increased since the election of President Trump. Yet people still expressed shock and surprise when it became obvious that Smollett had staged his own hate crime. But fake hate crimes aren't the only type of bogus story the MSM routinely falls for. In the past two years the national media has also rushed to embrace the phony Steele dossier, a multitude of fake Deep State leaks on the Trump/Russia probe that turned out to be spectacularly wrong, the outlandish Kavanaugh smears, and the Covington smears. PJ Media's own Roger Simon called the media's propensity for believing the unbelievable "magical thinking." Another possible explanation for the media's gullibility would be confirmation bias, which is defined as "the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses." The overwhelmingly liberal media tend to embrace stories that confirm their own biases and ignore those that don't. https://pjmedia.com/trending/why-does-the-msm-keep-falling-for-obvious-hoaxes/

Nick Sandmann, the "Make America Great Again" hat-toting 16-year-old from Kentucky seen in a series of January videos that showed him smiling among a crowd of his dancing, laughing peers as he was approached by an Indigenous drummer near the Lincoln Memorial, is suing the Washington Post. Sandmann, a student at Covington Catholic High School, is suing the newspaper for $250 million in damages, alleging that it engaged in a "modern-day form of McCarthyism by competing with CNN and NBC, among others, to claim leadership of a mainstream and social media mob of bullies," according to legal documents posted online by lawyers Lin Wood and Todd McMurtry. Said parties "attacked, vilified and threatened" Sandmann, according to the lawsuit. The Post claimed that Sandmann instigated the Jan. 18 encounter when it "conveyed that Nicholas engaged in acts of racism by 'swarming'" Indigenous veteran Nathan Phillips, "'blocking' his exit away from the students and otherwise engaging in racist misconduct," the lawsuit said. "The Post ignored basic journalist standards because it wanted to advance its well-known and easily documented, biased agenda against President Donald J. Trump by impugning individuals perceived to be supporters of the president." https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/maga-hat-wearing-kentucky-teen-sues-washington-post-for-dollar250-million-alleging-mccarthyism/ar-BBTPh7X?ocid=spartanntp Should there be a penalty for publishing fake news? We will see but this could be a landmark case.

Exactly.

You have no idea how much this made me laugh.

Why did it go "sideways"? Because I was saying things that you don't want to hear? Oh no! This is so sad. Such utter cowardice. Unbelievable. Anyway, time will tell who is right. I see a lot of AOC pumping going on right now. It will be interesting if you guys still are doing this in 2020.