JuranBoldenRules

The head butt should be enough for like a 4-5-6 game suspension. If a guy did that in the course of a play would be suspendable. The fact it was so far outside of the play needs to be addressed.

Could very well be. Hockey players attacking others with a stick have been charged criminally. This was obviously not part of the game. Collaros wasn't expecting contact there and there's no consent because play is so over.

The back judge clearly saw it cause he hauled ass and was in the fray before the Bombers players could even get near Robertson.

I mean who cares what they are comfortable with? The results are clear in these games. Did you see the pass rush at all? Only if they blitzed.

Other than the first 20 mins of the game when our O completely didn't show up but started between the 40 and midfield the whole time while Sask was pinned inside their 20 until their big play over Houston.

By reading this I believe you don't really understand the point. It's not like it's the same to run the guys out there for 60 snaps instead of 40 or 45. You'd rather have Jeffcoat at his best for 40 snaps than dead tired for 70. It's not really an either/or situation. They have the roster spot to get another body on D.

I want them to focus on fixing the offense. Other stuff like special teams is harder with roster, we are down a few important Canadians. The offense has so many weapons. Fix it. Should be able to stay on the field all night. On special teams if we can't cover...kick better! We don't have to kick it deep if Castillo can't get it inside 15.

They apply the penalty from the 10 on flags in goal. Is that what you mean? So the 15 yard no yards puts it on 25.

40-25 = 15. Single puts ball at 40 now. Take ball after FG is 40 now.

The single I would have handed back was the one with the No Yards. Gave up a point for 15 yards. Would have started at 25 with no point. Gave them a point to get to the 40.

Has one end of the ball but not the other and settles it against turf. Can't imagine that being called a catch more than 1/10 times on review. Bail themselves out maybe with "inconclusive"

Should be pretty easy to cut the ref crews from 5 to 4 now.

No they played a ton of zone. We just kept running out 3 by 2 (or 2 by 2 with extra OL). No real use of motion or formation tonight to create matchups. The max protect issue is one to think about too. We are wasting an eligible player on an OL most of the game. So the D has an extra guy in coverage all the time.

They need to focus on isolating him. Get everyone else to the field. Force the defense to either play him straight up or commit 2 defenders and leave space in the middle of the field for the rest to work. This offense is doing less with more on a weekly basis, often getting bailed out by Oliviera and a few big plays. They better have. TSN sure wanted to move along.

Parker was awful on kick cover. Can't really know who is contain but he was usually wide guy on right side of kickoffs and punt covers, consistently getting beat to the sideline on punts.

Collaros calling out league and PA for the QB headshots.

Was the opposite until the Jones play over Houston first 20 minutes of game. But we never took advantage of it. O could hardly get a first down, didn't even get 3 on the board.

Offense has real deficiencies in scheme. Rely way too much on the big play for the weapons we have. Get bogged down because forcing the big play, not driving consistently.

Can't challenge would just take a penalty. I mean I'm sure they are yelling at refs about it.

He traps it against the turf to secure it. It's not like he had it and rolled onto it.

Supposed to be automatic on a scoring play.

How does that 2 point convert not go to review? Need to get that call right.

Sask wins on 2 point convert they didn't catch.

Would be game over if they made the right call on Sask 2 pointer.

Not a catch.