JuranBoldenRules

Maybe they can offer Mike Reilly QB/OC and he can get out of his contract to join the Riders.

Take away a DI spot.

Back in 2009, the offense we see now were just getting started. The zone read was something fairly new. It was used in college & people thought it wwould never work in pro football but it was made for the wider field. Now it's just boring football, Seldom do qbs run with the football so linebackers or DE's don't have to worry about that threat anyway. Zone read was not new to the CFL in 2009. You watched Burris and Reynolds do it for years prior to that.

Kind of loses some effect when all the guys really exhibiting symptoms are into their 70s. Dementia at that age is a scourge for all, not just athletes in contact sports. Would be interesting for some reporter here to follow up with guys who played for us in the 90s-2000s.

Does Ottawa have money to go after big free agents? They have some big names of their own on that free agent list and presumably they're going to be getting some raises after this season... Everyone has money to spend. Just have to make corresponding moves. They have guys like Mo Price, Jovon, Shologan, Gott who are getting paid a lot more than they are worth and could easily be moved on from. Shologan and Gott are coming off the best seasons of their career. Why would Ottawa get rid of two starting Canadians, lol, that's a Bomber move. Because they have NI DL who can play coming out the wazoo and Alex Mateas. They don't have any quarterbacks who look like they can play beyond a guy who's on borrowed time. Being complacent with an aging 2nd place team is also a Bomber move. Remember 2008?

Does Ottawa have money to go after big free agents? They have some big names of their own on that free agent list and presumably they're going to be getting some raises after this season... Everyone has money to spend. Just have to make corresponding moves. They have guys like Mo Price, Jovon, Shologan, Gott who are getting paid a lot more than they are worth and could easily be moved on from.

Almost wonder if Rodgers the receiver followed the plan on that play if it would have worked. Looked like he was the guy waiting for the ricochet, then just went for the ball.

Toronto wouldn't be a bad place for Harris to re-sign. Ray's gonna miss half the season anyways. Will be interesting to see if Ottawa stands pat or goes after someone like Harris.

The only "upgrade" that is sure to get permission is assistant to head coach.

Calgary could have cared less though. One assumes Edmonton would care a lot more and go even beyond the CFL to uphold the contract if it came down to that.What are you talking about? If I had a chance to move up to a far better position and my company wouldn't even let me talk to the competitor, what do you think would happen to my job performance? It would tank. And then what would happen when my contract is up? I would leave. And what would happen when the company tried to hire a new coach who is in high demand? Either they wouldn't come or they would make sure it was in their contract that they could leave for a better position. The team isn't in any position of power in this situation and trying to flex your legal muscles on your most valuable employee is never a good idea.Head coach is a pinnacle position. There's no reason why a team shouldn't expect their head coach under contract to be focused on their franchise. This isn't really like two companies competing, more like playing two McDonalds franchises off each other. There should be a level of respect and bottom line decorum. They are the same company. All of the tanking performance stuff reflects far worse on the coach than anyone else. There's a huge difference between assistants moving up and head coaches shopping themselves while under contract. The only guy in CFL history who got away with that was Don Matthews. He also dated his players wives so not exactly a person of character.

Calgary could have cared less though. One assumes Edmonton would care a lot more and go even beyond the CFL to uphold the contract if it came down to that.

He could have a clause in his contract that states if he gets a higher position, i.e. GM, he can break the existing contract and accept the GM position. It wouldn't surprise me if he does have this clause. It would surprise me if a team agreed to that clause for a head coach. They don't want those guys shopping themselves all the time. Assistants for sure.

Pretty crazy. Our 3 QB's in that Grey Cup, Dinwiddie (CFL Co-OC), Kingsbury (Texas Tech Head Coach), Taylor (NFL OC) all high level coaches already.

Edmonton doesn't even have to allow him to talk to the Riders, and why would they?

There's no argument beyond the absurd to justify sports nicknames that characterize a group of people based on their race or ethnicity. If a group of African Americans don't feel that n***** is derogatory and use the word, should a team in Calgary feel free to name themselves the n*****s? Your example for "Eskimos" is just as absurd. The only good thing about the Eskimos is that they've never really used a human mascot for as long as I can remember.

Think of another word that might fit that description and the chances of a team being nicknamed that...

It's as outdated and derogatory as "Indian" in Canada. Only surprise is that this hasn't been an issue in the last 20-30 years. Speaks to how much of an afterthought the Inuit people are more than anything.

I hope they didn't spend a lot of money or time on this. Put the resources toward the actual product.

If you want worse football, move the season up. Weather is already miserable for many training camps, don't need to move earlier into May.

I'm sure certain people could put hard numbers forward if they wish, but I'd wager a majority of the seats are discounted through either the "deal" offered season ticket holders, corporate sales and now outright discounts.

I don't have a lot of sympathy for the people flooding Kijiji who do not want to attend the Grey Cup without the Bombers in it. There was a 99.9% chance in March that we'd be where we are today. I have a lot of sympathy for the people who were sold a bill of goods by the Blue Bombers, committing to 3 seasons while getting to watch Grey Cup tickets sold for the same or less all around them without that commitment. You just can't do that to people, the people who are really the builders of this organization. It is lucky for the Football Club that these people would not do anything that could possibly hurt the Football Club financially, because if they were dealing with a private business most would likely vote with their wallets, maybe even look into a class action to get out of the ridiculous one-sided commitment foisted on them in supposed good faith. The fact that screwing over long-time customers is worth less than a couple thousand empty seats speaks volumes.

I'd take him either way. He's a good enough receiver to be one of the best Canadians in the league at that position if he can't take the abuse at RB.

As long as there is a stadium to pay for, there will be a pro football team playing in it. If the stadium was paid for it would be a different ball game.

Dat would be the record completion percentage in 2005, Bob! That and his stupid ******* facial hair choices and his giant dumbo ears... he just looks like someone you'd want to punch right in the face. I don't care if he looks like the hunchback of Notre Dame. If he can get our offence firing on all cylinders. He's my guy! If we reject an OC with a winning track record purely because of his dumbo ears then we deserve to be 25 years without a Cup. Maas hardly has a track record. He'd be as big of a gamble as anyone if you're strictly looking at that. One season. I said Barrett in another thread a couple of weeks ago and was shot down, but now that the media is talking about him it seems like an option. Lawless just named every offensive coach he knows in that report. Don't think it means there's fire there, not even smoke.

These lists are meaningless until February 15.