17to85

MOR too... most outstanding Rourke.

Who says he couldn't play up to expectations? Really watch Tony Jones.play sometime... see if you think that's an untouchable player no matter what the # of tackles at the end of the game says. He's a decent piece, but he is replaceable and based on what I saw in one game, j. Jones could have easily replaced and done more.

I don't give a damn about Jones in particular, this is about how our roster is used.

Not with that attitude

Ahh yes, the blind trust that our coaches always make the best choices when building the roster. Carry on gents, I don't want to interrupt your cult meeting.

There is a difference between a position not being a problem and being impactful. Tony Jones has a **** ton of tackles but I would say he's had 1 game where he was impactful. Wilson I'd say maaayyybbbbeee one game where he was impactful. We can do better and J.Jones likely would have but he never got more than 1 game (which did show a skilled player IMO)

Tackles, oh yay. I'd rather a linebacker make plays than tackles. So why sign Jones if he's as trash as you say? It still points to a disconnect between coach and gm.

Even with J.Jones here T.Jones was never in danger of losing a spot. If the coach was so married to his guys at lb why even sign j.jones? That's the crazy part. Clearly the coach and gm are reading 2 different books at this point.

My concern is what the hell did the gm and coach talk about going into the offseason? Guys we drafted get no defensive snaps either. Just bizarre what's happening

See who signs him for the stretch run

Honestly tsn probably wants American teams in the cfl so they can just pick up an American feed and not have to produce anything themselves. So cheap that company

TSN is the embodiment of 0 effort because what are you gonna do watch sportsnet?

Consistent is consistent... or something

Wheatfall has just been so inconsistent

What are you looking to die in a tragic way?