17to85

I was thoroughly entertained by that game. Both teams looked like complete and utter garbage which is the best we can hope for.

Gonna try and scramble and bang his shin on a stove.

Lol that anyone won that game. Bombers gonna come out a whompin and a whompin.

This is exactly what I wanted this game to be.

Which is why it will be fun to watch.

Honestly I don't see much to choose between calgary or Saskatchewan. As for the east, all those teams are basically interchangeable. Flip a coin for whon s best on any given day.

It's ok, not everyone is a big fan It's ok for casuals to not appreciate every player on the team.

I guess being so tall with a huge catch radius does mean you can take advantage of the inaccurate throws...

Anyone else laughing at the marshall-gainey-purifoy section of the riders secondary? Also boyko at tackle. God how did that team get as many wins as they did?

You talk **** after you win, not before.

Only team that doesn't feel the need to talk is the Bombers. They do their talking on the field.

The only issue I have with demski is sometimes he carries the ball like a purse and it can get knocked out when the backside pursuit gets to him, but otherwise he is just such a versatile player.

If I know one thing about this team I know they will come out ready to play regardless of anything else. Every game is a street fight with this bunch and I expect nothing different in the playoffs. If a team wants to beat the Bombers they're going to have to slug it out for 60 minutes.

Yeah swift current, Regina and since I was going to the interlaken Yorktown or possibly somewhere just across the manitoba border for me are the usual stopping places.

Yeah but that wasn't me though, I was sitting pretty much in front of it and I said I liked the call, but you gotta hang onto the damned ball.

Am I wrong?

+1

Let the riders cry about only 2 Allstars, the reality is I don't think Johnson or Marshall even sniff a starting role in winnipeg.

No even with that the play not to lose offense wasn't going to get the job done.

Good thing this thread popped up! None of us die hard bomber fans had any clue! Now we can finally start to talk about this news.

Because it's on the way back to manitoba

None of this is as contradictory as you make it seem IMO. You sign a guy as a QB he has to play QB, OK but what stops you from putting a 3rd QB on the roster at the expense of a DI? He is just on the roster to stand around in case you need him. It costs you a DI though and DIs are very important to teams these days. Or you use a Canadian QB and it costs you a special teams player and potential depth at other positions. Now let's say you sign Streveler as a running back for example, now you can put him on the roster with anyone... but I bet the CFL would create a rule to prevent things like that from happening.