17to85

I think the biggest problem Whitehead had was lapolice trying to make him weston dressler. That's not who he is and it didn't suit him.

Perfect. Gonna use that from now on.

But they brought Gainey back!

Yeah! He can't lead a team to the promised land!

They will keep standing as long as the conservatives keep being run by the whackadoos in the party.

Those two aren't remotely comparable... wolitarsky is significantly better, and yes I truly believe ha can be a 1000 yard guy if used differently. Might not happen here because of how good and versatile Harris is though.

Ok but did lapo get the players he wanted to make his scheme work? Remember when we hired him how he talked about getting more say in his players? Even in 02 he used dump offs to roberts and sellers a crap load. The guy runs a very similar offence everywhere he goes.

Why change your policies to appeal to more people when you can simply prevent people from voting?

Don't look at evidence or call witnesses, it will make it harder to justify letting him off the hook!

Furthermore, can lapo win without a defense doing it for him? I mean as a heads coach here the bombers were good enough to just barely lose. Lapo loves to play not to lose which isn't a sustainable winning strategy.

Dare to dream.

Yeah old man Hughes with rider stink on him isn't needed here with Jeff squared on the roster.

Hell let's bring Nichols back and hope collaros and Nichols aren't hurt at the same time.

Follow a guy who under used you? Doubtful. I don't think lapo has a lot of loyalty from his players to be honest.

See what he means is freedom to commit genocide on dirty brown people without having to hear criticism of it.

Well it is their stockpile after all.

Yeah but you see they pay to have it sent via Canada post.

If I was happy and got what I wanted from my current employer why would I leave?

Yeah, no, we're not forgetting all your support of Trump.

Maybe he just likes the situation he's in? Is that so wrong?

No that doesn't sound like what I said. More likely I made a comment about the science being uncertain about predictions based on climate change models and talked about the need to consider the current economic impact regarding the oil and has industry.

Ran to a safe space, gotcha.

I am not disagreeing on the idea that fossil fuels take time to transition away from. I am simply saying that some of your sources aren't to be taken at face value because they are known to be biased. The reality is quite likely somewhere in the middle of what the oil and gas industry says and what the pie in the sky "end all oil" types think.

it's push back on the gaslighting that the republicans do. For example this drop it and heal nonsense they're pushing regarding their roles in inciting a failed coup.

I am not sure that the Canadian association of petroleum producers is an unbiased source... in fact they are known to be quite biased, and I say that as someone who worked in the oil and gas industry for 14 years and is a big supporter of continued support of the sector.