17to85

yeah somehow I don't think I'm going to be giving a **** what you think. Guy has been itching for a battle with me for a couple weeks, guess he didn't like the truth I laid out in the chat room a couple games ago and he didn't even bother to read what I had posted and thought he'd have a go at me, and he's welcome to try, but he better get his facts in order before he tries. Well perhaps he should calm down too. I'm sick of all these fights that get started on this forum. Annoying and just not necessary. Door is over that way if you don't like it. Hey I see you're back in the thread after Ottawa lost the game too. How coincidental. Wonder what it is... Oh it has nothing to do with that. I'd be here if Ottawa won too. which is why you were MIA until Dressler scored the long TD? And then disappeared again until it actually got to OT? Face it dude you were hiding when the Riders were losing, but now you try and pretend like you weren't, it's classic. Can't wait until a few more losses pile up and the lot of you disappear back to your own kind.

Well the obvious answer is Anderson... Now who starts that's another question entirely.

yeah somehow I don't think I'm going to be giving a **** what you think. Guy has been itching for a battle with me for a couple weeks, guess he didn't like the truth I laid out in the chat room a couple games ago and he didn't even bother to read what I had posted and thought he'd have a go at me, and he's welcome to try, but he better get his facts in order before he tries. Well perhaps he should calm down too. I'm sick of all these fights that get started on this forum. Annoying and just not necessary. Door is over that way if you don't like it. Hey I see you're back in the thread after Ottawa lost the game too. How coincidental. Wonder what it is...

It was a very exciting game, kinda like the 3 games we beat you guys in. And I don't think anyone is bragging, just happy that it looks like the Riders will be in good shape QB wise until Durant gets back for the playoffs. No not really, it was one mistake after another. The "tackling" on the Dressler td catch was embarassing. Burris looking like he just came into the league in OT was embarassing. Him underthrowing and over throwing receivers was embarassing. I get it, you're thrilled your team came back and won the game, but it was not a good game at all and they were fortunate that Ottawa started making so many mistakes.

I'll still be pi$$ed if the Riders miss the playoffs with a better record then the second place team in the east. you have that little faith in your team? Even before they got the win against Ottawa they were still in a good playoff position. Was unlikely the Bombers would pass them based on the head to head.

It's the cyclical nature of the league. Offenses adjusted a while back but now defenses have caught up. Some one is going to adjust on offense again at some point and start the cycle over again. I mean hell you go back 10 years and teams were only just starting to use one db at linebacker, now you have basically 1 standard with 2 common.

yeah somehow I don't think I'm going to be giving a **** what you think. Guy has been itching for a battle with me for a couple weeks, guess he didn't like the truth I laid out in the chat room a couple games ago and he didn't even bother to read what I had posted and thought he'd have a go at me, and he's welcome to try, but he better get his facts in order before he tries.

Look at all the chest thumping going on after a win that should have them thanking their lucky stars... Tino Sunseri didn't look great, and neither did Burris. His accuracy was off all game but they made enough plays to get the lead and then he went and played like a rookie in the late game and OT. The Riders escaped that game because Ottawa crapped their pants plain and simple. If you want to crow about that one go right ahead but it just makes us laugh at you all the more. Take the 2 points and keep quiet. There is no reason to brag about anything in that game. One of the ugliest games ever.

No, it's unreasonable to excuse stupidity. Oh so you're just being obtuse now with your insistence that only what you would call is the right call? You make a stop while up by 8 you win, you don't allow the 2 point convert you win, but they lost one of the few dbs that has been a bright spot and the shuffling happened in the secondary and suddenly it's a couple big plays, why act surprised? Play not to lose all you want. Still a crap call. But hey, if you like it, that's all that matters eh? so you're not reading either? What I said was it was a passive call but I understood the logic. Where did I say whether I liked it or not? All I said was I understood the logic. And I disagree it was a 'logical' call. It was the cowards call and leads to exactly what we're seeing now. I didn't say it was a logical call either, I said I understood what he was going for. Why are you even defending it then? WTF is the matter with you? I never did, you came at me and I stand up for myself, the question is, why are you making a big deal of it? And you wonder why I treat some of you like idiots. I don't wonder at all, you're an arrogant pretentious know-it-all, that's why your treat people like idiots. Well don't expect all us 'idiots' to bow to your superior BS. Have a nice night. You flew off at me because you didn't read what I wrote and chose to interpret it wrong, I called you out on your idiotic behaviour. Don't be an idiot and I won't have to call you an idiot.

The way that OT played off I wouldn't be boasting about anything if I was either team. Ottawa ****** up more than the Riders did in OT that's the bottom line.

The big issue with the up the middle handoff before their field goal wasn't even playing conservative, it was playing THAT conservative. You can call a safe play and still give yourself a chance at the first down. Not even trying to get better position to punt at the very end was inexcusable though. Maher was kicking the ball far, gotta give him a chance to hit the endzone. Get another 9 yards and he's got a shot.

No team is better at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory than Ottawa.

No, it's unreasonable to excuse stupidity. Oh so you're just being obtuse now with your insistence that only what you would call is the right call? You make a stop while up by 8 you win, you don't allow the 2 point convert you win, but they lost one of the few dbs that has been a bright spot and the shuffling happened in the secondary and suddenly it's a couple big plays, why act surprised? Play not to lose all you want. Still a crap call. But hey, if you like it, that's all that matters eh? so you're not reading either? What I said was it was a passive call but I understood the logic. Where did I say whether I liked it or not? All I said was I understood the logic. And I disagree it was a 'logical' call. It was the cowards call and leads to exactly what we're seeing now. I didn't say it was a logical call either, I said I understood what he was going for. Why are you even defending it then? WTF is the matter with you? I never did, you came at me and I stand up for myself, the question is, why are you making a big deal of it? And you wonder why I treat some of you like idiots.

That OT was like ******* humping a football

No, it's unreasonable to excuse stupidity. Oh so you're just being obtuse now with your insistence that only what you would call is the right call? You make a stop while up by 8 you win, you don't allow the 2 point convert you win, but they lost one of the few dbs that has been a bright spot and the shuffling happened in the secondary and suddenly it's a couple big plays, why act surprised? Play not to lose all you want. Still a crap call. But hey, if you like it, that's all that matters eh? so you're not reading either? What I said was it was a passive call but I understood the logic. Where did I say whether I liked it or not? All I said was I understood the logic. And I disagree it was a 'logical' call. It was the cowards call and leads to exactly what we're seeing now. I didn't say it was a logical call either, I said I understood what he was going for.

Hank has looked like a rookie in OT. no turnovers and no sacks, that's your #1 job as a qb in OT.

probably the way they've called the reswt of the game

No, it's unreasonable to excuse stupidity. Oh so you're just being obtuse now with your insistence that only what you would call is the right call? You make a stop while up by 8 you win, you don't allow the 2 point convert you win, but they lost one of the few dbs that has been a bright spot and the shuffling happened in the secondary and suddenly it's a couple big plays, why act surprised? Play not to lose all you want. Still a crap call. But hey, if you like it, that's all that matters eh? so you're not reading either? What I said was it was a passive call but I understood the logic. Where did I say whether I liked it or not? All I said was I understood the logic.

No, it's unreasonable to excuse stupidity. Oh so you're just being obtuse now with your insistence that only what you would call is the right call? You make a stop while up by 8 you win, you don't allow the 2 point convert you win, but they lost one of the few dbs that has been a bright spot and the shuffling happened in the secondary and suddenly it's a couple big plays, why act surprised?

Hey look! there he is again! riders must have made a play and stopped sucking worse than Ottawa for a moment.

you saying it's unreasonable to think that an expansion team has depth issues?

That draw call was even worse. Maher was kicking the crap out of the ball, give him a chance for the single at least.

all those injuries in the secondary likely played a role on that last drive

it's really passive but I can see some logic to it. I think you gotta do more than a hand off up the middle though.

That's exactly it, between him and Owens it's perfect for Ray. He loves his quick throws that receivers can turn into big gains. He had a lot of success with another guy of that type in Terry Vaughn.