17to85

Well we hope we do. What harm is there in determining that after training camp? This team is not so stacked in NIs with experience to just cut guys willy nilly.

going to assume TSN has a hockey game to show

The point is some of you took the Etienne thing so personally that you wanted him run out of town but are perfectly happy to entertain the thought of bringing in another shitty receiver just because.

That's how it works here in dope-legal WA state. You can't blaze one anywhere you can't smoke a cigarette. And you can't smoke a cigarette pretty much anywhere in public. and that's how it should be, the smell of that **** is just so off putting I don't want people polluting the air with that anywhere near me.

Maybe its time to bring Ian Logan back? not the point, point is replace guys when you have a better option not before.

A team that is pretty loaded with wingers and weak at centre and D (especially if trading Phaneuf) forgive me if I doubt the accuracy of that. I suspect they would prefer to get a top 6 centre for the guy but I don't see the Jets having the depth there to make that move either.

Then what the hell was Bauman? This isn't a defence of Etienne this is simply saying if you look at high draft picks who didn't live up to the draft position Bauman is the poster boy. At least Etienne is young enough to have a chance at getting better. Bauman likely gets a job based on Ottawa increasing the need for NIs but his career will end in a year or two and he'll be nothing more than a footnote and cautionary tale about getting too excited about high draft picks.

I hate cutting veterans before training camp though, look how that played out when we did the same with Ian Logan. Give guys a chance, though I suspect Muamba wouldn't have fit here. Seems to me it's going to be a defence that is based on everyone making reads on the field and thinking and making good decisions was Muambas biggest problem.

given that they're loading up on dbs and cutting lbs to do it I am getting depressed... it's been like 12 years since the team has won in Calgary but if we're speculating correctly about the changes to the D the Stamps are just going to run all over the field on these guys and I'm going to have to endure another ass kicking in that stadium. I just want to see the damned team win for once when they make the trip to Alberta.

You realize that you're being stupid about this right? Ed Tait puts it in print that the rumours are there, that's one of the most respected and plugged in football reporters in the country hearing things about it why on earth are you still arguing this when you've been proven wrong? There is a time and a place to just accept that you were mistaken and move on you know.

That's because it IS giving up too much on Torontos part. Toronto would probably like to get a replacement D in return for Phaneuf so you're probably looking at Phaneuf for Bogosian + (yes Phaneuf is a better player than Bogosian right now)

Hard to care about American politics that much, ultimately the guy who winds up in the white house doesn't really matter since everyone in Washington is bought and paid for and if the lobby groups don't like something it doesn't get passed and if they want something passed it gets passed. Their system IMO is horribly broken.

wouldn't shock me actually. would depend on Burke's views on him. well Burke ******* raved about the guy when they signed him and in training camp and then in typical Burke fashion tossed him under the bus to try and absolve himself of the blame for that shitty shitty team he put on the field. What Burke thinks of a player matters very little to me at this point in time because he lost all credibility in that field last season.

The problem with Phaneuf is that he is a top pairing guy and is paid like it and the leafs will expect that kind of return for him. He is a flawed player but he does have talent. Leafs paid him too much but I don't see him being traded for a small price either.

No one had patience for Etienne but you guys want to sign Bauman? Come on now.

And they're OK. They sleep all night and work all day..... They wear high heels, and black lace too, suspendies and a bra...

Da fuh? thought Parker looked good in his couple games last year, would have liked to see him get another chance.

I don't believe that's a cliche... There's a reason the guy can't keep a job for long. Trying to re-invent the wheel is a giant red flag. If those ideas were so good other teams would copy them, the CFL is a copy cat league. If something works everyone does it, I don't see anyone copying Etchevary

see there you go again, falling into the fallacy that because you have an uncommon opinion you're open minded. It doesn't work that way. I've read the whole thread, I know what's going on, trouble is when people close their minds they tend to do a lot of self affirmation as well. You see things as you want to see them.

Atomic's? Cause my argument isnt my argument. Its the argument of many doctor's, scientists and nutritionists. Although it does suck that milk is unhealthy. No you're argument for why you are right. It's a terrible argument which basically boils do to you screaming "NUH UH!!!!! USE COMMON SENSE *******!!!1111!!!!one!!!" You aren't interested in hearing opposing viewpoints you're convinced you are correct and will shout down anything contrary to your opinion. That's what makes it a terrible argument. Again, I'm not taking sides in this, I don't care enough about it to bother, but I know when an argument is bullshit and when it isn't and you are too closed minded to ever have a proper debate on the topic.

because 'murica

You will be hard pressed to find a bigger fan of Wild than me, but I dunno just seems he's pretty small, if it works great but I hope he's not put in a position to fail. He was so good where he was last year I'd have left him there.

I'm not taking any position, I'm just saying your argument sucks.

isn't wild a bit small for a MLB though?

Honestly the unknown posters entire argument here sounds to me a lot like the anti-vaccination peoples argument. "I read this study that links vaccines to autism, use some common sense here people, these guys are doctors!" Seriously buddy I'm not going to get into the validity of the study or not but if you can't see how closed minded your position is then I don't know what to say. You are claiming the common sense ground but you are so convinced that yours is the only possible position to have that you don't even acknowledge that another position might have merit. That's not common sense, that is simply being closed to other opinions. You made up your mind and everyone who doesn't agree is just an idiot.