iso_55

Minority Liberal government. Both Harper & Mulcair resign.

True story, I actually thought I might be because Rich has been deleting my posts and sending me PMs about hurting other posters feelings.... Thought I mighta been booted when it wouldn't load! You're actually one of the nicer people here. Last week was a tough one for all of us. .

Is Tamina really that good? She's big & strong but I don't see a lot of talent there like Sasha Banks or Becky.

Some real problems there. Yeah. Real problems big time. Be nice to see Angle back buy I really doubt it happens. Maybe nxt as a coach or trainer but doubt the main roster. I wonder if he ever regretted leaving WWE for TNA?

Some real problems there.

Don't like the Jays. Rogers owns them. #ABTJ #ABR

Argo's just lost another home game. This time they're headed to Hamilton. This nightmare can't end soon enough for the Argos and the CFL. I hope they institute a permanent ban on any Rogers involvement with the CFL for all of eternity. Fans should boycott those dipshit Rogers devices. And Rogers owns the Jays which is why that team can go screw itself.

We gotta be catching up after the Calgary and Edmonton games! Yeah, it's all about those 2 moral victories.

I'd have liked to see Angle back but to be truthful, I don't watch TNA so I don't know if Angle can still wrestle at a high level or not. He's also had some injuries as well as personal issues over the years since he left WWE relating to drugs & alcohol so maybe Hunter looks at Angle & doesn't see the return on investment from him if he did come back.

Very good. Tyler Breeze was tremendous tonight.Makes you wonder how Hunter can book NXT, Steph can sit ringside and yet on RAW they screw up the women so badly. Vince It blows my mind really. Im watching Bayley and Sasha kill it out there. Hunter & Sara Del Rey are handing out flowers, Steph is sitting with Charlotte, Becky and Lita and chanting "women's wrestling" with the crowd. And then you tune into RAW and they all forget? I can honestly say if someone said Steph and/or Vince replied to criticism with "yeah but thats just NXT, this is WWE", I'd believe it. But hey, no one in NXT is dating John Cena so you dont have to book his princess as the division killer. Team Bella isn't very good that's for sure. Nice to see Natalya back. I guess she can now work as her husband is recovering from his broken neck. That has to be a tough situation for them both. I actually think Paige is now spoiling the Diva division not the Bellas. She's a great worker but her character needs some kind of makeover.

I sure hope the Argos get all the financial proceeds tonight. Like parking, concessions & ticket sales.

Cry? I don't think so. Why do you make things out to be something they're not? We all know that you like Liram. You've defended him more than anyone here & don't like it when he's criticized.

Agree but what competent players do you put in there ... Veltung for Stoudermire? Castillo for Hajrullahu? Goosen for Picard? ??? for Neufeld? Who do you have in mind? There's about 10000 football players who are pro quality looking for work south of the border. Should be able to find a kick returner who doesn't kill the team and a punter. I'd be playing 3 imports on the OL until we have a 3rd capable NI, and I'd bring in a guy who actually is a guard to play inside, not be moving guys like Capers who is a tackle, inside. What a concept!! It only makes sense.

I think apologizing for missing 4 field goals & a convert was unnecessary as Liram didn't mean to do it. He shouldn't have run off the way he did after the game as that was wrong. He has to learn how to face adversity & deal with it when it happens. Not 3 days later. Hopefully lesson learned. He didn't run off -- the team made him unavailable to the media to shelter him. I heard that he ran off.

No idea why he was signed. No idea why he got as many carries as he did. No idea why he was constantly ran up the middle. A series of puzzling moves. All I know was that when Walker was in being useless our best back sat on the bench. Bellefeuille is a piece of work.

By the third hour no one cared anymore.

Name a veteran coach who isn't 70 who would come here. No to Higgins. There isn't one Well then, it's hopeless. Fold the team.

I think apologizing for missing 4 field goals & a convert was unnecessary as Liram didn't mean to do it. He shouldn't have run off the way he did after the game as that was wrong. He has to learn how to face adversity & deal with it when it happens. Not 3 days later. Hopefully lesson learned.

Last I heard Guelph had not approached Walters and he was completely committed to his job as GM of the Bombers. Has something changed? Just sayin'.

I switched once that tag team match with Rollins & Kane ended. That waa bad enough. Cena vs Big E for the US Championship? Couldn't be bothered to watch it. Langston sucks.

Owens an ass? What did he do to make you feel that way?

No idea why he was signed in the first place?

Yep some people are ignoring those things...probably because they have absolutely no bearing on this conversation. You can't apply generalities across the board as if they are absolutes. You judge MOS solely on his body of work, and with the facts you have, if you are the Bombers....certainly not on historical data. If we ignore history, we're doomed to repeat it. If you ignore context, you're doomed to sound like an idiot. Yup... let's ignore history because context (excuses) are so much more reliable. #haha As long as we want to remember history, let's do that by all means. I'm looking at our history of cleaning house every couple of years. Seems to me that we haven't done so well doing that, but by all means, let's do it again because 5th-or-6th-or7th time's the charm, right? The main debate, if we're all playing the role of GM, is how much patience do you show for your head coach before it's time to change? Obviously subjective and full of varying influences. But is there some general number that can be used as as a marker? Or is it strictly scenario by scenario that you can't put a number on? For myself, I think you give MOS one year with an option (can you do that with a head coach - option?) to demonstrate we're heading in the right direction, i.e., is in the running to win it all. You'll never attract a top quality head football coach with such a short contract. I understand what you're saying, but controlling for whether you think MOS is top quality or not, are you suggesting MOS would walk if this was offered? I suggest he'd probably have stayed in Toronto. Certainly I don't think anyone else would have applied either. Coaches are hired to be fired & need some kind of soft landing when it does happen.

Yep some people are ignoring those things...probably because they have absolutely no bearing on this conversation. You can't apply generalities across the board as if they are absolutes. You judge MOS solely on his body of work, and with the facts you have, if you are the Bombers....certainly not on historical data. If we ignore history, we're doomed to repeat it. If you ignore context, you're doomed to sound like an idiot. Yup... let's ignore history because context (excuses) are so much more reliable. #haha As long as we want to remember history, let's do that by all means. I'm looking at our history of cleaning house every couple of years. Seems to me that we haven't done so well doing that, but by all means, let's do it again because 5th-or-6th-or7th time's the charm, right? The main debate, if we're all playing the role of GM, is how much patience do you show for your head coach before it's time to change? Obviously subjective and full of varying influences. But is there some general number that can be used as as a marker? Or is it strictly scenario by scenario that you can't put a number on? For myself, I think you give MOS one year with an option (can you do that with a head coach - option?) to demonstrate we're heading in the right direction, i.e., is in the running to win it all. You'll never attract a top quality head football coach with such a short contract.

Yep some people are ignoring those things...probably because they have absolutely no bearing on this conversation. You can't apply generalities across the board as if they are absolutes. You judge MOS solely on his body of work, and with the facts you have, if you are the Bombers....certainly not on historical data. If we ignore history, we're doomed to repeat it. If you ignore context, you're doomed to sound like an idiot. Yup... let's ignore history because context (excuses) are so much more reliable. #haha As long as we want to remember history, let's do that by all means. I'm looking at our history of cleaning house every couple of years. Seems to me that we haven't done so well doing that, but by all means, let's do it again because 5th-or-6th-or7th time's the charm, right? Maybe if the Bombers got it right every once in awhile... But they never do.