SPuDS

sask looked gooooood... collaros looked solid.. if i was to make a play for anyones back up, that might be my gamble.. sure garbage mins but nice passes, excellent evading the rush and thst side step on whoever it was before his TD was pretty sick.. sask oline looked best in league tonight to me anyway

you dont think so? willis is not as dominant as he once was where as i think hall still hasnt come to his.ceiling yet.. not being a homer, just seems like his timing, his speed and his ability to zero in and not blow by or get washed out seems better..

hall has completely made forget about willis.. hall is as good or.better a pass rusher and his contain and run stopping is miles ahead and hes still apparently "learning" it..

goltz!

you know, i have always respected.you as a poster.but ive come to realize you are literally incapable of posting without coming across as a raging thunder ******..

you guys have your opinions, i have mine. i respect what you guys think but i simply don't agree.. im goimg to continue to believe that buck can and will get it done and hopefully he shows it..

your acting like he has not been successful before or that even with inconsistent play, that he doesnt win.. both are wrong.. if he's able to string it together enough to score some and our defense keeps it up... we can win.. suggesting otherwise is just being ignorant.

been very impressed with our lbs so far this season... too early to call it a strength... but def not a glaring weakness

works for me, lol.. i can appriciate with what your opinion is as well.. its not looking like it will be enough.. but i see better days ahead... im also a uber optimist lol

how do you figure? he won, yes? he made plays when needed, yes? he didnt give the game away... pretty sure his stats line was pretty... yup, you guessed it.. average.

yup i agree.. and its new to boot.. its not like buck and the offense have been in it for years... its gonna have warts to burn off..

mathews was off, no question but didnt get many touches.. ac was really upset and really worked over...

nope not harsh at all, all good.. I simply believe buck can and will do whats expected of him once he and the receivers all get on the same page and the blocking steps up.. simpson, normally a very good blocker, chunked a bunch today.. we all seem to forget this is still a new look offense as well.. it has to.be ironed out fully to get the wrinkles..

montreals defense made ajdustments? that or we started to play scared again...

have some patience.. he can and will do it.. he hit jade last game for a beauty quick hitter, kolhert for some hitches and quicks tonight.. he will improve.. besides, goltz.. is he ready? i dont think so..

oh ease up. you have a strong dislike for buck and thats all well and good but he is not "bare minimum" hes satisfactory for now if he keeps playing at this level... wouldnt be the first time the bombers go with an average qb and be successful.. salsbury and Burgess come to mind..

no. pierce can and will win for us. he made some very nice throws today. give him some credit.. he also took a beating and kept going.. if we figure out how to gear our offense to punish the blitz then it will loom even better..

meh, scored when they needed too.. get rid of the turnovers and its a winnable offense when we figure out how to make blitzers pay...

offense is close.. needs fine tuning.. our defense tho is scary if they keep this up.. montreals oline was embarrassed.. turner ruined flory.. without touching him at times!

wow. our line ruined ACs day.. dunn is apparently good? lol. if offense can get it together and we can get some ball control issues fixed... we may have a solid squad here.. oh and palardy, cooooooome on maaaaaaan... and hope turner is ok..

trying to figure out this and the reason for his schtick as well..

he also hit mathews on that reverse fade for the td, jade on a quick out for 8 yards and pontibrand for a big first down too so stop trying to make it like hes incapable.. its a work in progress, no doubt but not thos dismal failure your implying..

sad and definitely true..

horrid article written by an hack trying to make himself relevant.. why is it so hard for guys to write like tait? tell it like it is and not embellish to hell and gone? i guess copying friesen is just easier..

maybe due to your antagonistic, pompous posting style??