sweep the leg

Not scared of the Stamps. We'll hang 30+ on them this week.

It's still once more than never.

My guess is his answer would be the same, but with a ***** slap thrown in for good measure.

"A poor man's Hall Gill"? Can't say I've ever heard anybody called that before.

Winnipeg, Edmonton, Calgary I had also picked TO to win, so missing that game doesn't matter to me.

http://www.mmaweekly.com/dana-white-explains-why-the-ufc-signed-cm-punk-and-its-not-a-good-explanation

I don't know. Has he?

My thought was a trade to so we'd have 2 & 3. It would take Trouba + to get it done though.

I've been wondering about a Columbus trade too. I was thinking they'd want Trouba as part of the trade.

As long as we don't pick Tkachuk. I hear that guy's terrible...

So who's the second guy, other than Bond, on that chart to sit tomorrow? One of the nine linebackers?

I'm sure if they think it's possible he could miss the next six weeks if he plays tomorrow, they'd rather sit him too. They have tickets to sell over that time span as well.

Do you honestly believe the training staff would give him the go ahead if they thought it would cause long term problems?

He did deserve it. I don't like that guys from other pro leagues can come in and be considered a rookie, but until they change it we'll still get the odd 24 year old rookie of the year.

Harris listed as starter for the game per Darren Cameron!

No he wasn't. He was the best rookie while McDavid was injured.

I don't think Punk will ever fight. Imo he won't make it through a full training camp.

This signing gets a big meh from me. His career thus far has been pretty uninspiring.

One of those names is not like the others... Although I suppose Stafford doesn't exactly deserve mention alongside Carter & Green either.

It all seemed very predictable. My 9 year old called the Ambrose run-in at the end of the main event. I considered it an almost foregone conclusion that he was going to win the money in the bank match. They all but announced it on the previous RAW episode. I don't watch a tonne of wrestling, but from what I have I'm not much of a fan of Ambrose or Styles. I'm not sure what it is. Maybe it's Styles' terrible haircut...

I get that, but is there any reason Wally couldn't have gauged their interest before cutting them?

So does this mean Wally cut them before asking if they were willing to be pr'ed, or that he didn't care if they stayed or not? If he really wanted to keep them, he could have put them on the 1 game ir. I'm pretty sure you only need permission to put a player on the 6 game.

Deservedly so.

We won't have enough if we cut any more...

Do you know for sure that he still has eligibility?