Atomic

As much as we've all been let down by Neufeld, when you see teams scrambling to pick up national OL (BC trying to poach PR's, signing Andrew Jones... Calgary trading for Dillon Guy... Montreal trading for Matt Vonk...), you know Neufeld would fetch a pretty decent price.

I could get on board with that, but you have to expect that several teams, such as the Lions, would also be making a hard push.

Sable is definitely up there as well. Right up with Jerry Lawler yelling "Puppies!!"

Jesus in the time in took to post 4 times, you could just find it yourself and connect the dots.

Might cast some shade, but that's not such a big deal, and a total non-issue at night.

It's crazy how quickly it's going up.

I think I would agree, in general. Guys like that "Mosaic" clown deserve everything they get but in the more recent case of a guy like szaroz71 or whatever his name is, he is just joining the conversation and shouldn't be insulted out of the building.

Congratulations. All hail our glorious, infallible leader. Now get in line.

I wonder how many other CFL players we would be able to say that about if they faced the same media scrutiny as Manziel.

That seems a little heavy-handed. A single accusation of domestic violence and you can never play in the league? Not a conviction, but an accusation? I'm not sure that's the right way to handle things.

This is a great point as well. McDuffie led the league in KO return average last year and didn't look like anything special in the couple games he's played for Ottawa this year... a full 7 yards lower per return, albeit in a small sample size. Is it the cover teams or the returner? I have a feeling that any of our other options would be putting up solid kick return averages as well.

Well. The Bombers are tied for second in terms of kickoff return average and Lankford is third among guys with 15 or more returns. So I have a hard time saying he's the best, statistically. And when I watch him return I'm not so sure he's the best either. He does well... But not the best. I think moving the offence consistently is more important than the 2-5 yards per return we may or may not lose by substituting someone else for Lankford on kick returns.

Well the Shallcross guy seems like a real piece of work, that's for sure

Yeah I don't think you can talk about the Attitude era without mentioning the sexual aspect of things led by guys like Godfather, Val Venis and to a lesser extent Goldust. That was a huge part of what made the Attitude era what it was.

Even the best coaches make mistakes. i'm not saying this particular move is necessarily a mistake but it's always fair game to question professional GMs and coaches. 8 of the teams don't win the Grey Cup every year so 8 teams with professional GMs and coaches are making more mistakes than the guys who won the Cup.

He has caught one deep ball all season, I don't think opposing DC's are all that worried about him. I'll take the heavily-involved first-down machine over the deep-threat decoy all day. And Lankford is not the best kick returner in the league... I simply can't agree with that.

Whatever the reason is, the production has to be better. Last 3 games he has had 2 catches for 40 yards, 0 catches, and 1 catch for 5 yards. He is being targeted... but less than 60% are resulting in catches... worst among Bomber receivers. It's been clear that Nichols and Lankford aren't quite on the same page. Whether that's on Lankford or Nichols, I can't say, but Nichols is hitting his other receivers at a 65%+ rate. Meanwhile we potentially remove a guy in Thorpe who had 5+ catches in each of his first 5 games before an off-game against Montreal. Many of which were key second down conversions and late-game drive extending plays. Dressler and Darvin Adams are both good deep threats. We don't need Lankford in the lineup with Dressler back, we need a good possession guy who can grind out YAC. Pulling out Thorpe for a guy who regularly makes only 0-2 catches per game is going to be a mistake.

**** there were a lot of good wrestlers in the attitude era. You're right. But still, as a kid in middle school, the Godfather introduced me to pimps and hoes and it was insanely popular. That's one thing that I know is true.

Yes it is, and we won by a mile. I expect the same result on the scoreboard. Bombers - winners, Riders - losers. Now and forever.

Tough to keep it up if the RB is averaging less than 5 yards and putting us in 2nd and long.

I guess the novelty is wearing off already if the LDC isn't sold out. SAD!

Let's not forget that the WWE HoF isn't about wrestling ability or championships or any other tangible quality. It's about popularity first and foremost.

Probably for the best. All the French people laugh at us for having a company named MTS

I think the ESF against Montreal in 2007 and the ESF against Edmonton in 2008 were not particularly well-attended. But the EF against Hamilton was absolutely sold out, I will never forget that game!

People liked the ho-train and the character and everything that went along with it. Keep in mind the main audience at the time was adolescent boys. Either way, he was a huge part of the attitude era and absolutely HoF-worthy. If you had to pick five wrestlers who defined that era, he would be one of them.