Jump to content

BBlink

Members
  • Posts

    2,709
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by BBlink

  1. I'm worried about whether Mouton has the grills or not for that #.
  2. Milt didn't drop many but you can get away with dropping a few when every catch has a chance to go to the house
  3. Really? Etienne couldn't even play special teams. Basically useless for a game day roster
  4. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtney_Smith_%28linebacker%29 I feel like holoman
  5. Sarcasm
  6. Our NI receivers aren't very deep. I'd be willing to give him another chance as well. But I find it hard to believe he would come back here.
  7. Do you think he resurfaces?
  8. After Ike Charlton wore #0 I didnt know who could possibly do justice to that number ever again
  9. Would be interesting to know if players have worn #6 or #11 in training camp?
  10. You set the bar way too high for me.
  11. Montreal is known to sign guys for the PR (not practice roster). Have a hard time believing he will stick, but all the best to him.
  12. Beat the Riders 3 times.
  13. Sounds like Kyle owes Duane Forde a doughnut. Also - how pissed off is Wally right now? He had this kid in the bag and Forde totally screwed it up for him. If he had signed a contract as an import would he have been able to change his designation? I doubt it. So I'm not sure it's a huge loss for the lions but a big gain for us in that respect
  14. Competition will be fierce for which Canadians play on defence. No guarantee Buckner starts at corner
  15. So he should be good to start at least 4 games this year... Garrett Waggoner's mini hamburgers.
  16. I think we only start one canadian receiver at the start of the year.
  17. Didn't tackle Lumsden that one time!
  18. I like how this thread is going
  19. Gotta wait for the big guns to shake loose.
  20. In this scenario we would be giving Sask their future NI receiver and an NI offensive lineman in his prime for our future NI receiver and a big fat question mark for next draft. I would hope that we'd get more back in return if we made a trade like this. I don't think this quite makes sense from our side.
  21. Would be a risky trade. If we are trading a bonafide Canadian starter, I would hope we'd get a bonafide Canadian starter back in the deal. This also hinges on whether Kyle Walters is confident that Chungh and Goosen are the real deal.
  22. 2nd to the last I believe. So we can outbid the other teams except Ottawa. Someone said we should be interested in Waggoner. He play S/DB but his size is prototypical CFL MLB. - 5.11 230ish. Yep so even if we bid a 1st rounder there's no guarantee.
  23. Interesting... We're second at the table this year...anybody of interest?
  24. "Richards over Waud is baffling" ... its about where help is needed most We don't need help on DL? I know we're all excited about Westerman but he's got only two or three years left really We have way more flexibility for NI on defence. At this point we could put one at DE DT, two linebacker spots, wide side corner and safety. And we only need 2 of those at any given time, and we have a lot of pieces to do that. I can see why it is more important to bolster our NI receiving content as we are not very deep there.
  25. We started a NI at DB last year too; Matt Bucknor. With more NI DBs on the roster they could choose to use a DI at a different spot. If an American DB goes down they could put Sherman, Newman or Morgan at safety and move Leggett into that spot
×
×
  • Create New...