Yeah, reminds of the time Berry tried to challenge a play that he wasn't able to. He was given a penalty. Or even Otts coach getting his challenge taken along with a time out. I just don't know that rule well enough to make sense of it I guess.
Fantastic idea by the Esks. People just don't have the funds for sports like they used to. And kids have way more options for entertainment. Really hope the Bombers follow their lead.
I bet if it was a must win, he would have been put there. Never seemed to be that bad. Same reason they let Bighill sit, why push it this early in the year? Get the back ups some playing time.
I was simply replying to your statement about them winning "a couple games". They haven't. They beat one of the worst teams the CFL has seen in years. Ssk sucks. And will only get worse as time goes on.
I was buzzed last night when I replied, so this morning I thought maybe I was in the wrong....this just confirmed I wasnt. Points....like touchdowns...the thing the Defense hasnt given up in 2 games? Wtf am I missing? Can anyone else make sense of this "argument"?
Go pound sand. Streveler was fine. Executed the plays that were called. You must have a special definition of Kicked in saskatchewan. Sliding and hitting it with his knee doesnt qualify as kicking in the rest of the world.
You have to be a God damn ******* moron to be complaining about the way the defense played today. End of story
1 td in 3 games...done. theres no argument against that.
Yeah the beat down they put on TO made me rethink the ol "over hyped" talk about Hammy. That was a legit performance by every aspect of their team. You don't drop 60 points very often in football and to do so, you need to be playing a **** team, but also need to be a very efficient team.
Cant give Davis the early/quick reads. Ssk was doing that to him all game and he torched them. Bring pressure, and disguise coverage and Davis will hold on to the ball like it's his child.