Jump to content

Logan007

Members
  • Posts

    3,859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Logan007

  1. Well, say bye to Burris. Who's next? All I have to say is, we better get a damn good QB Coach.
  2. What I find hilarious about this, is that if we don't get Burris, Lawless will be bashing Walters down the line for not spending the money and going after him. Don't forget to mention that lawless is also fat and bald. You're statement is speculation with no basis in fact. Gary didn't bash Walters for not landing collaros. In fact he defended him. Yes it is speculation. You're just a wizkid aren't you?
  3. I think Burris is holding out because he wants a 3 year deal and Bombers only want to sign him for 2. Someone tweeted that last week. Not sure which guy and I'm not about to route through all their tweets to find it, but I think that's what's holding him back. But who knows really.
  4. I agree with the article from Lawless. But I guarantee if they followed his plan and they ended up having another bad year, Lawless (any many of us) would be blaming the Bombers for not going after Burris harder.
  5. I think it's more because he knows this is probably his last stop and he's trying to suck out as much money as he can before he retires.
  6. What I find hilarious about this, is that if we don't get Burris, Lawless will be bashing Walters down the line for not spending the money and going after him.
  7. Unless Ottawa is prepared to release/trade Glenn? Kinda odd to take Glenn just to release him. But if they did for whatever reason, I'd be happy with Glenn too as our Vet.
  8. gary lawless ‏@garylawless8m More than QB needs fixing. #bombers Need to know how much cap they'll have on Feb 15th. If I'm Kyle Walters - Burris deal expires this week gary lawless ‏@garylawless6m Obvious only deal with guaranteed starter money is coming from #bombers. Burris has right to try and get most money. But can push too far Not sure what Gary knows that he thinks only the Bombers are offering Hank starter money. But Gary and Rod are apparently on different ends of the spectrum.
  9. And this is why I would give Goltz another chance, at least bring him into TC. When you have 3 different QB's who dumped on Burke/Crowton and being disgruntled and apparently bad attitudes.... it's a little bit to much coincidence. Boltus needed to be cut because quite frankly whats the point of having a 3rd string qb if he can't even do a basic sneak? If you wern't going to play Levi then why not at least sign McPherson just to help close out the season.... I agree. Goltz got a raw deal. No on ever properly trained him, and then he was thrown into being a starter. Then when he didn't do well, all he was told by Burke is how bad he played. And I don't think he was so much a prima doña as he was trying to inject some life into this Bomber team by showing some attitude. And then he was punished for it by our amazing HC. I'm not saying Goltz would ever become a great QB, but I think with someone training him he could have done better then he did.
  10. A TICAT FAN!!! BOOOOOOOO! Hissss!! You can't sway us with your sweet tantalizing words and firm buttocks.
  11. I don't care. As far as I'm concerned now after what just spewed from his lips...he's defence fodder. Logan's marching off to war. It's a Holy Crusade now!! Let's not rile him up any further .. I have to work with the guy! ;-) We have to teach him he made the wrong choice. And that the comments coming out of his hole are stupid. The one nice thing we have right now is our stadium. YOU DON'T BASH OUR STADIUM!!! He must pay for his insolent remarks. HAVE AT THEE!!!
  12. I don't care. As far as I'm concerned now after what just spewed from his lips...he's defence fodder.
  13. LOL ok now I really want him to fail. He just said the stupidest thing I ever heard. That he thinks the ticats stadium is going to be better then Winnipeg's. Is he being serious??!?!!! That **** stadium is going to hold nothing to ours. I hope whoever we sign shoves that football down the ticats throat.
  14. Wasn't meant to be a joke, just a comparable situation. I think he was talking about my comment "You gotta stroke that Willy, stroke him good, then he'll come into the Bomber's folds".
  15. You gotta stroke that Willy, stoke him good, then he'll come into the Bomber's folds. Too far dude, too far.... Hey, you can never push big Willy too far.
  16. That's quite the coincidence Dude...I'm providing HIGH END information here! This knowledge could prove to be our key to winning.
  17. No offense, but I seem to recall a lot of people saying that Collaros in the Peg was automatic and now this fanbase makes it sound/seem as though Burris and Willy were the plan the whole time and suddenly it's a better situation. Sounds more like opinions changed because we couldn't take the cheerleader to the prom, so now acting as though taking the audio video geek was our first choice all along. I don't think anyone said it was automatic. People didn't think anyone else wanted or needed him. We were wrong. Big surprise. Stop twisting what people are saying. Also, I don't see anyone on here that thought Burris and Willy were the Bombers plan all along. Most of us thought they wanted Collaros. Some, like Mr. P said he wanted Willy and Burris, but most of us thought they were going to go after Collaros. He's gone now...we're moving on. What do you want us to do, continue to whine and ***** that we didn't get him and hold on to the past? No, we've let it go and now we're looking at who we want second since someone else won out on Collaros. Now we'd like to get Burris and Willy. Hopefully we at least get Burris. But you never know. If plan A doesn't work, you modify your goals and hope for plan B.
  18. Kirk Penton ‏@PentonKirk5m RT @Darren_Cameron: New #Bombers defensive back @24Banks will wear #24.
  19. You gotta stroke that Willy, stoke him good, then he'll come into the Bomber's folds.
  20. I understand and agree with both points, my point was pretty simple I would think, Goltz didn't deserve to see the field, he was atrocious out there, he could run.............. that's about it. Leaving Boltus out there was a stupid mistake though, especially in short yardage situations. Right, but our point was just that, we were stuck with both of them, Goltz should have been used. I still think he's the best short yardage guy out there right now. Should bring him in as a short yardage/RB and mix up what he does.
  21. I dunno, doesn't look too bad: PASSING Completions Touchdowns Interceptions NameYear Team Comp Att % Yards Long TD % Ints % Rating WILLY, D 2012 SSK 69 95 72.6 709 43 5 5.3 4 4.2 93.7 WILLY, D 2013 SSK 32 52 61.5 473 45 4 7.7 1 1.92 108.9 Career Total 101 147 68.7 1,182 45 9 6.1 5 3.4 99.1 RUSHINGNameYear Team Att Yards Avg Long TD WILLY, D 2012 SSK 33 115 3.5 18 4 WILLY, D 2013 SSK 18 22 1.2 3 0 Career Total 51 137 2.7 18 4
  22. From Penton..."Mr. Knowitall" Kirk Penton ‏@PentonKirk41m @3lue_n_6old Team says nothing to report.
  23. Yeah, no one has tweeted anything yet as I just checked so...hopefully.
  24. Considering some of the wild salary claims made here lately, are you sure? I think that's WHY he was kidding. LOL. FYI, I heard Etienne was offered 400K to resign.
  25. Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Let's not pretend that Goltz played well at all, or that he even deserved another shot. Aside from Boltus being horrendous, there was no other logical reason for Goltz to ever see the field again. Yeah you're right. Goltz, being able to run the ball and actually make a few plays by throwing, was just as equally bad as Boltus, who couldn't even hold onto the ball after the snap.
×
×
  • Create New...