Logan007

This is how I want to be... Or like this...

And that's why most of your arguments fail. Not because you're wrong, but because you constantly insult people calling them idiots. Seriously, grow up with that crap already. But I do agree with you that we need to establish a passing game as well. But we still need to run it more and we're not doing that enough. The more touches he has, the more Simpson will figure out the defense and blow through them. Especially if you do it over and over each game. Charles Roberts had an average of 15-17 touches per game from 2004-2006 and then it dropped slightly in 2007. This is what Simpson needs.

Hey I had the same dream...except it was Oscar from Corner Gas. I think he'd get blown away pretty fast.

Hulk = Bomgers Thor = Toronto

Is that what I said? No. I said give it to him more then 11 times. You can't expect a good run game with just 11 carries. We've discussed this before. 20 times per game is a good number to shoot for.

Give Simpson the ball more then 11 times PER GAME and maybe he'll show everyone what he can do with it.

*cough*....Khalif...do your thing. Kidding aside, I really don't want to see a person get hurt, I just want him pulled. At least pull him when he's doing bad. Let your second or third get some play time and see what they can do.

It's sad to think Khari was our last decent QB (Glenn was alright, but didn't have the career Khari did). I miss Dave Ritchie too.

I think I'll go Sheets as well with Hamilton's defense.

No she doesn't, but she did make it sound like they didn't give Buck time to throw at all. Even the headlines.

That and instant replays. They show the different angles of the game and you can see the receivers open...waving their hands in the air...apparently to hail a taxi cab.

Yeah I noticed this wasn't written by our typical hairbrained Lawless-type.

That's Buck for you. Always peddling his "special" tonic:

Yesterday's interview: http://www.bluebombers.com/video/index/id/86345?autostart=true Crowton had the audacity to say it was our receivers who were getting beaten by the other teams DB's. What game was he watching? Because I saw many times where our receivers were wide open and Buck was just standing there. I'm not saying Buck is the whole problem, but he's at least 75% of our offensive problems. Not once did Crowton or Burke talk about Buck's bad play. Well, Burke kind of mentioned it, but nothing specific.

So apparently it's the offensive line's fault that Buck couldn't pass the ball? http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sports/football/bombers/sack-rilege-buck-abused-215477961.html I'm not saying our offensive line is great, because it does need work, but I've seen improvement already over the last 3 games. And I watched buck stand there for 3 full seconds against Hamilton and not throw the ball.

He looks like he's going to rupture something. It's like Mike Kelley except without the screaming.

Especially if they play in Winnipeg with him next game. The Boo Birds are going to be out in full force. I agree with others here. Buck needs to go, and the question we all seem to have is, why isn't Burke pulling him?

Wow...that commercial with Chris Schultz...he has this teeny little pin head on this big body. LOL

Andrew Harris

Sorry, to clarify, I just meant, I'm going to the game with the family and wanted to know if that was a good spot. I wasn't worried about the cursing. Although I'm sure they'll hear KBF swearing from where ever he is in the stadium.

Ok, Voodoo showed me some stuff. Picked my seats. I'm good. Carry on...nothing to see here.

Hey all, My wife and I want to buy tickets to the Saskatchewan game (few tickets still left) and bring the kids, and I'm just wondering how Section 116 is? Should I go up to the top of that section or more in the middle? Just trying to think what may give us a better view of the field. Thanks.

Yes exactly. You can't put the D on the field for 3 quarters of the game and expect them to not run out of wind. I noticed in the last quarter, they were just running out of steam. I bet had our offence just stayed on the field for a longer time during the game (and I mean just stayed on the field, they wouldn't even have needed to score points), our D would have shut out Montreal's offence in the last quarter and we probably would have won.

Crowton's play calling is sub par from what I've seen. Unfortunately we have no one else and can only hope he gets better. And, FYI, the only reason Buck put points on the board last night is because of how badly Montreal played. Buck looked very shaky, especially after the hits he took. But he was looking shaky even at the start. I mean, have you ever watched a close up of him on the camera? The dude's got this glazed over look like he's staring into the magical tunnel of wonder. I find a lot of the comments regarding, "none of the other QB's have proven themselves yet so Buck's our only option" kind of dumb. How is a QB supposed to get experience if they never play him? Seriously. Throw Hall or Goltz out for a few series and let's see what they can do. I'm not saying the whole game, just a few series. It's either that or wait till Buck gets pounded into the ground, or plays so badly one of them has to come in. And just as a last note, our D was amazing last night and carried this team. I haven't heard anything on Turner yet, but I hope he's ok and recovers quickly.