Logan007

I once thought Dennis Quaid would make a good replacement.for Ford. Oh yeah. You know, that's a good call, I never thought of him but I think he could have. Although aren't they the same age? I don't think Reynolds could replace Ford though. He's too smart mouthed. He doesn't have that ruggedness about him.

Yes, we are so desperate that this is not inconceivable.

No no no, football players, especially quarterbacks only have so many hit points and we used up all of Willys before he had a change to regenerate some. NNnnnneerrrrrrrrrrd! yeah but everyone has known that for a long time. I'm amazed Noeller hangs out with you considering how much of a non-nerd he is.

Plus he's like 67 years old. I doubt the guy wants to come and coach football and yell his ass off just to get a heart attack.

Employed, St. Louise Rams. Offensive assistant coach...he ain't coming back to the CFL now. $$$

Danny Barrett was a decent coach and a pretty good QB in his day, but he treated media and fans like they were invading Nazis. I think we talked about this last year or the year before. Danny is a RB coach at UCF. Apparently he's making decent money.

It's part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe now, so this should be the last time. At least for a very long while. This is what really annoyed be about DC's decision to go with a new Batman. TDK Trilogy was so good and Bale was good and we were all invested in it emotionally and then they start over? Hate that. Im glad to hear they want to lock Affleck up as the Robert Downey of DC. Although it does make you wonder why they went with an "older" Batman if they want to get 6-10 films out of him. I guess if they are smart they can eventually tell the Return of the Dark Knight story. I like Affleck and think he will be really good. Affleck is the same age Downey was when he did the first Iron Man (Affleck will be 43 when Batman vs Superman comes out. Downey was 43 when the first Iron Man came out). Granted, I don't think they had the complete foresight of what the Marvel Universe would become when they made that first Iron Man movie in 2008. It also begs the question. Now at 50 and moving in on 10 years later, how much longer will Downey be able to keep playing Iron Man? I think the real question is, how long is Marvel willing to keep paying Robert Downey Jr.? The guy doesn't come cheap anymore and I believe Marvel has already said they're quite comfortable just re-casting characters... now obviously with that one it's going to be tough because people just associate RDJ with Tony Stark and I dunno if they'd just accept a new guy. But when they can take obscure stuff like Guardians of the Galaxy and make big money maybe they just stop using Iron Man entirely for a while. If they're going to let him walk, they might just wait till phase 4 after the Infinity War. Or do you let the character get old, and forego the comics and let him pass the torch instead? I doubt it but it's just a thought.

They cancelled the previously planned Amazing Spiderman 3 & 4 movies. However a new Spiderman played by Tom Holland will reportedly appear in the next Captain America movie to come out in 2016 and his own solo movie as Spiderman in 2017. So basically, as many reboots as it takes until they start losing a lot of money on the franchise ... They won't reboot Spidey for a long time now that it's part of the MCU. That would ruin the way they set up their movies.

It's part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe now, so this should be the last time. At least for a very long while.

Wanting federal money to support homeopathy is a big deal because it shows a willingness to waste public money on something with no benefit. The only effect it has is the placebo effect and there is no way quackery should be funded by the government. That the party policy supports this tells me that a vote for that party is wasted because it shows how poor their judgement is in a significant area. What else do they have these kinds of poor judgement on? FYI blue cross covers homeopathy. But I guess it's all a placebo effect just because you say it is. No it's all the placebo effect because that's what all the scientific studies say it is. Yeah I am sure people can come up with examples of someone getting better after taking it.... but that's the placebo effect. There is no basis in science for homeopathy. It's no different than praying for someone to get better. Maybe it gives someone peace of mind of lets them think they're doing something but it is not a replacement for actual real medicine that has a strong scientific backing. Dude you need to just stop.

This is what I don't understand, and maybe it's because they're both not micromanagers, but when Burke was here, our D sucked, yet he didn't seem to do anything to help Creehan it seemed. Now our special teams suck and it seems like MOS isn't helping out Tracey. What gives?

You can't compare a guy who's only been playing 1.5 years as a starter to those who have been starting 5+ years.

Whether or not studies show wifi is bad for the human body is of no concern to me. Mine and my family's health is. So I try and err on the side of caution in this case and try to limit the amount of exposure when I can, especially for the kids. Cancer is rising too fast all over the world, so I'm trying just trying to limit as much exposure as I can personally. But to get back on the subject. Just because you don't agree with May, doesn't mean she's a nut case. Everyone has different beliefs. You laugh at her using homeopathy, yet in 50-100 years from now, I bet we as a people are going to look back at Doctors of today and go "omg...I can't believe they were using that quackery back then. What kind of archaic medicine were they using."

Weird...3 teams this week got 26 points. 2 games had the exact same score.

Well there we go. I picked right. Big friggen deal seeing as everyone else did as well so it really counts for nothing.

That seems strange. Why is she against WIFI? If she supports homeopathy in conjunction with traditional medicine no harm in that. I think when 17 says she says Wifi is bad, she means that it's bad for you I'm guessing? Which is true, if that's what she means. Any electronic or wireless signals can disrupt the cells in our body. If she just means wifi is a bad thing...well...who knows why she's against it.

If you know who Deadpool is in the comics, then you'll know this is pretty accurate. You have to like Deadpool to enjoy this movie.

Oh dang, I forgot to post that here a few days ago. I'm losing my touch.

I thought Edmonton was a sure win. Then it was a flip for Montreal or Ottawa. I figured I'd go for Montreal...bleh. All I need now is for Saskatchewan to win to ruin things for me.

Mr. Rogers, Mr. Dressup, Sesame Street, Romper Room...those are the ones I remember when I was a tiny tot. When I was little, I started with: Honorable mentions: Quick Draw McGraw/El Kabong, Yogi Bear, Space Ghost, Bullwinkle ,Captain Caveman, etc... As I got a bit older, it then became: Honorable mentions (cause I don't feel like looking up anymore pictures...and it only allows me to post so many): Gobots, Smurfs, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Gummi Bears, Alvin and the Chipmunks, Bionic Six, Muppet babies, Inspector Gadget, etc, etc, etc.... And of course, the thing we all watched:

FML...seriously! I hate everyone who is getting 3 or more pick'ems right every week.

Do you have a job? Maybe you should ask the Freep or Sun to start paying you a salary! Yeah, what the hell kind of job do you have where you always seem to be at practice?

Dont they have this already? For home use? Yeah, it's called a wife/girlfriend.

D-Box

OMG this is so stupid. How does it improve a movie by having water splashed in your face? I don't even like watching movies in 3D. Also, I wish they wouldn't call it 4D. The 4th dimension is time, not physical touch. I know this is "movie talk", but it's based after Dimensions.