Mr Dee

Not sure about Hinds being worth the look see, seeing as he's failed a few times already, but in Hind sight.....it's still a bad idea.

Not really, with 'Brody McKnight-in-shining-armour' kicking 55 yard FGs in practice, we only have to get to the Sask 48 yd. line. Bob Irving ‏@BobIrvingCJOB 29s Mcknight Showing off big leg at bomber practice, launching 55-yard field goals.

Can't tell you how long I waited to hear Douglas at RT.

Makes sense to me. Not too much of a stretch from 'coach' to 'couch'.

Well, we got bending over down pat and I don't mean for blocking...

I believe, sometime in 2012, Jonathan Hefney became Jonathan Hef*me

There was an offside call. Could have been a line call, but #96 was flagged. There was time for a substitution but Hall waved off the replacement and stayed in the game. Everybody knew at this point that there were going to be 'consequences'. Burke should have pulled him at this point and benched him for a few series. With our limited rosters and depth, that's all he could have done to address it immediately IMO.

Softer.

Still want an "unlike" button You must mean dislike. I 'liked' your last post and there already is an option to unlike.

The only reps at IGF at this time are player reps. Practice starts tomorrow.

That's when you're facing the O-Line, right?

So how is it the FP get exclusive rights to all leaks?

But, what a name!

The cycle for Bomber head coaches goes -> co-ordinator, head coach, tsn analyst, coordinator. Lapo won't be getting a cheque from the Bombers next year but Burke will, so Lapo will start coaching again and Burke will take his place on TSN. Good theory. I like it! There's nothing like an analyst with a deadpan delivery who has to be prodded to give an answer. The best part is he only has to draw xx's on the chalkboard, seeing as he has no knowledge of offence. He can also take Buck with him to explain blitzes.

One thing I can say about Sandro is he's already converted more tricks plays in one try than we have in 3 years or more.

You know, these signings remind me of the way we used to conduct business. i.e., if there seems to be a problem, bring in somebody to take a look. You never know when you're going to tag that long ball when you're only expecting a bunt. So yes, I'm more optimistic, not necessarily for these particular guys...but for the thought that we're looking at improvement.

Haven't we been pining for free agents and guys who have been in the CFL? Too true.

You must mean Dudley in Dis-Guice...with glasses.

I almost don't want to know who it would be. And that might not change after they announce it.

Boltus and one veteran CFL 'bigger' receiver, plus a former NFL rec. plus an unnamed practice roster player, the position which, he wouldn't name. -----from the T Burke show.

Won't Hamilton be surprised when they face a team that has a pro offence and defence, coached by real coaches?

The only release this weekend will be that of the newly renamed 'Lack of Depth Chart'.

If a QB truly has only 'so many licks' to have laid on him, then Reilly's shelf life is being shortened game by game.

And here I was giving credit to the coaches when Buck was replaced by Goltz. No way it entered my mind he might be injured.

It's called deceptive zone coverage and we're very good at it. Too good. Other teams just aren't falling for it or they just misreading what we clearly are signalling what is not open.